Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Computer Science# Computation and Language# Artificial Intelligence# Machine Learning

Tree of Thoughts: A New Approach to Problem Solving

Introducing a structured framework for language models to improve decision-making.

― 5 min read


Revolutionizing DecisionRevolutionizing DecisionMaking in AImodel reasoning capabilities.A novel framework enhances language
Table of Contents

Language models are making strides in solving various problems, but they often function in a limited way when it comes to decision-making. Typically, these models look at words one at a time, which can lead to issues when tasks require more strategic thinking or when early decisions are crucial.

To address this limitation, a new framework called "Tree Of Thoughts" (ToT) has been introduced. This system allows language models to handle problem-solving in a more structured way, using "thoughts" as intermediate steps. It enables models to consider different paths and choices before reaching a conclusion.

Problem Solving with Language Models

Language models like GPT-4 are trained on a wide range of tasks that require different kinds of reasoning, whether mathematical or logical. However, they generally rely on simple methods for decision-making that are not enough for complex problems. The idea behind ToT is to improve how these models think about problems, allowing them to explore and plan better.

Research on how humans make decisions suggests that people often use two modes: a quick, instinctive mode and a slower, more thoughtful mode. The challenge is to integrate these two approaches into language models. Currently, most models lean heavily on the quick mode, which may not always be ideal.

The Tree of Thoughts Framework

ToT aims to fill the gap between simple decision-making and more involved planning. It treats problem-solving as a search through a "tree," where each branch represents a different thought or action. This allows the model to evaluate different options before making a choice.

The ToT framework is built around a few key steps:

  1. Thought Decomposition: Breaking down a task into smaller, manageable thoughts or steps.
  2. Thought Generation: Creating potential thoughts based on the current stage of the problem.
  3. State Evaluation: Assessing how close the thoughts are to achieving the goal.
  4. Search Algorithm: Implementing a method for exploring possible thoughts and paths.

Applications of Tree of Thoughts

To demonstrate the usefulness of ToT, three specific tasks were identified: Game of 24, Creative Writing, and Mini Crosswords. Each of these tasks involves different kinds of reasoning and planning.

Game of 24

In this mathematical challenge, players are given four numbers and must use basic arithmetic operations to reach the target of 24. The ToT approach allows the model to generate intermediate steps, leading to more successful outcomes.

When the model was tested using traditional methods, like standard prompts, its success rate was low. However, when ToT was employed, the model achieved a much higher success rate, demonstrating the effectiveness of the new framework.

Creative Writing

In a creative writing task, the goal is to write a coherent passage based on four random sentences. This task is open-ended and requires planning and creative thinking.

Using ToT, the model was able to generate better passages than when using simpler approaches. Different writing plans were created before generating the final text, allowing for improved coherence and consistency.

Mini Crosswords

Mini Crosswords are a type of puzzle that requires filling in words based on provided clues. This task is more complex, as it involves a mix of linguistic reasoning and strategic planning.

Again, when ToT was used, the model significantly improved its performance, solving more puzzles than it could with traditional prompting. It could better explore potential word choices and backtrack when it encountered dead ends.

Advantages of Tree of Thoughts

The main benefits of the ToT framework include:

  1. Generality: ToT can be applied to various tasks, allowing for flexibility in problem-solving.
  2. Modularity: Different components of the framework can be adjusted independently, making it adaptable to specific needs.
  3. Adaptability: The framework can accommodate different tasks and resource constraints.
  4. Convenience: No additional training is required; a pre-trained language model is sufficient to implement ToT.

Limitations and Future Directions

While the Tree of Thoughts framework shows promise, it may not be necessary for every task, especially those that language models already handle well. Future research could focus on more complex tasks where decision-making is critical, such as coding or data analysis.

ToT may require more computational resources than traditional methods, but its flexibility allows users to balance performance against costs. There's also room for improvement in efficiency, such as optimizing Search Algorithms or exploration methods.

Conclusion

The Tree of Thoughts framework represents an advance in how language models tackle problem-solving. By enhancing the decision-making process, it allows models to handle complex tasks more effectively. This intersection of traditional problem-solving techniques and modern AI capabilities shows potential for future developments in language understanding and reasoning.

Broader Impact

The Tree of Thoughts framework has the potential to improve the decision-making capabilities of language models. While this work focuses on reasoning and search problems, future applications might involve more direct interaction with the world, presenting both opportunities and challenges.

As models become more capable, careful efforts must be made to ensure they are used responsibly and for beneficial purposes. Enhancing interpretability and alignment with human values will be important when deploying these models in real-world scenarios.

Final Thoughts

The research into the Tree of Thoughts framework opens up exciting possibilities for enhancing the capabilities of language models. By focusing on how these models reason and make decisions, we can extend their usefulness beyond simple tasks and into more complex problem-solving scenarios. As this field continues to evolve, the intersection of cognitive science and artificial intelligence will provide valuable insights and advancements.

Original Source

Title: Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models

Abstract: Language models are increasingly being deployed for general problem solving across a wide range of tasks, but are still confined to token-level, left-to-right decision-making processes during inference. This means they can fall short in tasks that require exploration, strategic lookahead, or where initial decisions play a pivotal role. To surmount these challenges, we introduce a new framework for language model inference, Tree of Thoughts (ToT), which generalizes over the popular Chain of Thought approach to prompting language models, and enables exploration over coherent units of text (thoughts) that serve as intermediate steps toward problem solving. ToT allows LMs to perform deliberate decision making by considering multiple different reasoning paths and self-evaluating choices to decide the next course of action, as well as looking ahead or backtracking when necessary to make global choices. Our experiments show that ToT significantly enhances language models' problem-solving abilities on three novel tasks requiring non-trivial planning or search: Game of 24, Creative Writing, and Mini Crosswords. For instance, in Game of 24, while GPT-4 with chain-of-thought prompting only solved 4% of tasks, our method achieved a success rate of 74%. Code repo with all prompts: https://github.com/princeton-nlp/tree-of-thought-llm.

Authors: Shunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran, Thomas L. Griffiths, Yuan Cao, Karthik Narasimhan

Last Update: 2023-12-03 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10601

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.10601

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles