Understanding Light Nuclei Production in Heavy-Ion Collisions
This study explores light nuclei formation during heavy-ion collisions and its implications for nuclear physics.
― 4 min read
Table of Contents
Heavy-Ion Collisions happen when nuclei of heavy elements collide at high speeds. These collisions can produce various light nuclei, such as deuterons, tritons, helium-3, and alpha particles. Understanding how these light nuclei form in such collisions helps scientists learn more about nuclear physics and the behavior of matter under extreme conditions.
Importance of Light Nuclei
Light nuclei play a crucial role in nuclear reactions and the dynamics of nuclear matter. They are produced abundantly in heavy-ion collisions and can significantly affect the outcome of these interactions. The production and behavior of light nuclei provide insights into fundamental properties of nuclear matter, which is important for understanding events like supernova explosions and the formation of compact stars.
Model Development
To better understand how light nuclei form during heavy-ion collisions, we develop a Kinetic Model. This model incorporates light nuclei as active participants in the collision process. It accounts for the conversion between nucleons (the building blocks of nuclei) and light nuclei. This conversion happens through breakup reactions, where light nuclei can break apart into individual nucleons, and inverse reactions, where nucleons come together to form light nuclei.
Dynamic Reactions
In our approach, we include reactions that allow light nuclei to break apart or form during collisions dynamically. For instance, if a deuteron collides with a nucleon, it can either break apart or remain intact. This dynamic treatment captures the way light nuclei interact with their surrounding nucleons.
Mott Effect
An important aspect of our model is the Mott effect. This effect describes how the presence of nearby nucleons can influence whether a Light Nucleus remains bound or breaks apart. If the density of surrounding nucleons is high, a light nucleus may no longer stay together. We incorporate this effect into our model to reflect realistic conditions during heavy-ion collisions.
Experimental Observations
Recent experiments have shown that light nuclei, especially alpha particles, have enhanced yields at low energies in central heavy-ion collisions, particularly in collisions of gold nuclei. This surprising result suggests that the Mott effect plays a significant role in the behavior of light nuclei under these conditions. Our model aims to explain these observations and provide a clearer picture of what happens during these collisions.
Kinetic Equations
To study the time evolution of light nuclei in collisions, we derive kinetic equations. These equations describe how the distribution of light nuclei changes over time during a collision. We take into account various factors, including the energy associated with different particle species and the collisions between them.
Reaction Channels
In our kinetic model, we consider multiple reaction channels that contribute to light nuclei formation. This includes both elastic and inelastic scattering processes. The inclusion of these various channels allows us to recreate the observed experimental data accurately.
Numerical Simulations
We simulate heavy-ion collisions using our kinetic model, focusing on central collisions of gold nuclei at intermediate energies. Our numerical approach helps us track the production and dissociation of light nuclei over time.
Yield Predictions
Our model is able to reproduce the measured yields of light nuclei in these heavy-ion collisions. We observe that the yield of alpha particles increases significantly at lower incident energies, which is consistent with experimental findings. This enhancement is attributed to the Mott effect and the binding energy characteristics of the alpha particle compared to other light nuclei.
Comparison with Other Models
Traditionally, other models have described the production of light nuclei in heavy-ion collisions. However, many of these models do not account for light nuclei as dynamic entities in the collision process. By including light nuclei as active components, our kinetic model offers a more complete picture.
Future Studies
Understanding the production and behavior of light nuclei has broader implications for nuclear physics. The parameters we establish in our study can guide future research on nuclear matter, especially in extreme conditions seen in astrophysical events. We hope to expand our model to explore the role of light nuclei in other nuclear reactions and their potential impact on phenomena like supernovae and neutron stars.
Conclusion
In summary, our kinetic approach provides a new way to understand light nuclei production in heavy-ion collisions. By integrating dynamic reactions and the Mott effect into our model, we can accurately reproduce experimental yields of light nuclei. This work contributes to a deeper understanding of nuclear matter and may help answer fundamental questions in nuclear physics and astrophysics.
Title: Kinetic approach of light-nuclei production in intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions
Abstract: We develop a kinetic approach to the production of light nuclei up to mass number $A$ $\leqslant$ $4$ in intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions by including them as dynamic degrees of freedom. The conversions between nucleons and light nuclei during the collisions are incorporated dynamically via the breakup of light nuclei by a nucleon and their inverse reactions. We also include the Mott effect on light nuclei, i.e., a light nucleus would no longer be bound if the phase-space density of its surrounding nucleons is too large. With this kinetic approach, we obtain a reasonable description of the measured yields of light nuclei in central Au+Au collisions at energies of $0.25$ - $1.0A~\rm GeV$ by the FOPI collaboration. Our study also indicates that the observed enhancement of the $\alpha$-particle yield at low incident energies can be attributed to a weaker Mott effect on the $\alpha$-particle, which makes it more difficult to dissolve in nuclear medium, as a result of its much larger binding energy.
Authors: Rui Wang, Yu-Gang Ma, Lie-Wen Chen, Che Ming Ko, Kai-Jia Sun, Zhen Zhang
Last Update: 2023-05-04 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02988
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.02988
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://doi.org/
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2004.12.004
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2008.04.005
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078070
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.052701
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.062502
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.162701
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.11.001
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.172701
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.062702
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.012701
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.77.055804
- https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015007
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.46.2002
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.63.034605
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.09.008
- https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13081406
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103962
- https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02724711
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.13.451
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.107.1616
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.25.1460
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.39.2242
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.044609
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.054311
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.054618
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135532
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.044617
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.044907
- https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.12532
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.015803
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064330
- https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00851-2
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe4688
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2003.09.006
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043202
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-022-01040-y
- https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474