Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Health Sciences# Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy

Understanding Shoulder Instability in Young People

Study reveals distinct movement patterns in youth with shoulder instability.

― 6 min read


Youth ShoulderYouth ShoulderInstability Studyshoulder instability cases.Distinct muscle patterns found in young
Table of Contents

Shoulder instability is a condition where the shoulder joint moves too much, leading to problems like partial or complete dislocations. This happens because the humerus (the upper arm bone) shifts excessively in the glenoid (the part of the shoulder blade that forms the socket for the joint). Various classification systems have been created to help identify the reasons behind shoulder instability, which can be caused by different types of injuries or structural differences in the bones and tissues.

Factors Behind Shoulder Instability

Shoulder instability can be influenced by many factors. These include the type of injury (whether it happened suddenly or developed over time), how severe the instability is, and the role of muscles and tissues that support the joint. While personal and social factors may also play a role in this condition, they are often not discussed in the current models used by healthcare providers. Recognizing the most important factors can help improve treatment and care for those affected.

There is a lot of focus on shoulder muscles and their activity when diagnosing and treating shoulder instability. However, current treatments are often based on assumptions that lack solid proof. For example, it's believed that how different muscles activate or work together may impact whether someone experiences shoulder instability. Studies often connect movements of the shoulder to Muscle Activity, but many do not measure actual muscle force, which can lead to misunderstandings.

Some researchers believe that the changes in muscle activity seen in individuals with shoulder instability might actually be the body adjusting for stability rather than causing instability itself. These adjustments may be due to various factors, such as differences in bone structure or changes in soft tissue around the joint. Furthermore, many studies do not track muscle activity over time or consider a complete set of arm muscles, which limits their findings.

Treatment and Rehabilitation Challenges

Understanding how to treat shoulder instability is complicated by the incomplete knowledge of how muscles control movement. Rehabilitation efforts may try to restore "normal" movement patterns or train patients to use different strategies to keep the joint stable. However, many treatment methods are based on general ideas about how the body should move and don’t always take specific patient needs into account.

When treating shoulder instability, it's essential to consider both the physical aspect and the possible mental or emotional effects. Young people with shoulder instability can vary significantly in their symptoms and treatment needs. This variability makes it important to tailor assessments and treatments to each individual’s unique situation.

Imaging tools like MRIs can show structural issues in the shoulder, but there are no reliable methods to measure muscle activity in young people with instability. Some techniques used for the lower body are available but have not yet been widely applied to the upper body, which creates gaps in our understanding.

Research Purpose and Methods

This study aimed to investigate whether there are differences in movement and muscle activity between young people with shoulder instability and those without. The goal was to understand these differences and measure them accurately.

To conduct the research, participants were recruited from a medical center and included young people aged 8 to 18 who either had shoulder instability or were matched with those who didn't. After getting consent, each participant underwent a detailed assessment of their movements and muscle activity. They kept diaries of any shoulder instability episodes and were contacted monthly for a year to record further incidents.

In the group with shoulder instability, participants had various experiences, including both traumatic injuries and cases that developed without a clear cause. Many reported recurring episodes of instability, while some were unsure of the specifics of their condition.

Participant Assessments

Participants underwent a series of evaluations to determine their shoulder instability. This involved looking at the type of instability, any signs of discomfort, and tests to check for looseness in the shoulder. They also answered questions related to their medical history and how long it had been since their last episode of instability.

For the movement analysis, reflective markers were placed on key body parts to capture movements accurately. Participants were instructed to perform both light and weighted tasks while their movements were recorded. This process allowed for detailed tracking of joint angles and muscle activity during the movements.

Key Findings

In the study, a total of 30 young people were tested-15 with shoulder instability and 15 without. This allowed researchers to compare their findings side by side.

The results showed that young people with shoulder instability exhibited differences in how their muscles operated and how they moved compared to their peers. For example, the group with instability tended to keep their shoulders in a protracted (forward) and elevated (upward) position during movements. Additionally, certain muscles, like the middle trapezius, worked harder, while others, such as the latissimus dorsi and triceps, showed reduced activity.

Interestingly, no significant differences were noted in the pectoralis major muscle, which is often thought to play a role in shoulder instability. This lack of difference might suggest that other factors are at play in the mechanics of shoulder instability.

Implications for Rehabilitation

These findings highlight the complexity of assessing shoulder movements. They suggest that the traditional methods of evaluation often overlook the nuances of muscle activity and movement patterns. Moreover, simply analyzing one type of movement may not provide a complete picture of an individual's condition.

The research indicates that understanding shoulder instability in young people requires a more in-depth approach. Establishing a universal evaluation protocol that takes individual differences into account will be critical for effective diagnosis and treatment.

Future research should focus on examining how different factors-such as age, type of instability, and social influences-affect shoulder instability. There is also a need to examine how rehabilitation methods can be tailored for better outcomes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, young people who experience shoulder instability demonstrate distinct patterns in movement and muscle activity when compared to their peers without instability. They tend to adopt strategies that may limit their movement to enhance stability. Current treatment approaches need to adapt to account for individual differences and the varied nature of shoulder instability. Moving forward, healthcare providers should integrate more comprehensive evaluation methods to better understand and treat shoulder instability in young individuals effectively.

Original Source

Title: Young people with all forms of shoulder instability demonstrate differences in their movement and muscle activity patterns when compared to age- and sex-matched controls.

Abstract: BackgroundShoulder-instability is a complex impairment and identifying biomarkers which differentiate subgroups is challenging. Robust methods of measurement and movement protocols for improving our current understanding of muscle activity mechanisms, which may inform subgrouping and treatment allocation are needed. HypothesisNull hypothesis: there are no differences between the movement and muscle activity of young-people with shoulder instability (irrespective of aetiology) and age- and sex-matched controls (two-tailed). MethodsYoung-people between eight to 18 years were recruited into two groups of shoulder-instability (SI) or and age- and sex-matched controls (CG). All forms of SI were included and young-people with co-existing neurological pathologies or deficits were excluded. Participants attended a single session and carried out four unweighted and three weighted tasks in which their movements and muscle activity was measured using 3D-movement analysis and surface electromyography. Statistical parametric mapping was used to identify between group differences. ResultsData was collected for 30 young-people (15 SI (6M:9F) and 15 CG (8M:7F)). The SI cohort had mean (SD) age, height and weight values of 13.9 years (2.9), 163.0 cm (15.7) and 56.6 kg (17.5) respectively. The CG had age, height and weight values of 13.3 years (3.1), 160.6 cm (16.8) and 52.4 kg (15.1) respectively. The SI group demonstrated consistently more protracted and elevated sternoclavicular joint positions during all movements. Normalised muscle activity in Latissimus dorsi had the most statistically significant between group differences across all movements. The SI group also had increased normalised activity of their middle trapezius, posterior deltoid and biceps muscles whilst activity of their latissimus dorsi, triceps and anterior deltoid were comparatively decreased. DiscussionYoung-people with SI may constrain their movements to minimise glenohumeral joint instability. This was demonstrated by reduced variability in joint angles, adoption of different movement strategies across the sternoclavicular and acromioclavicular joints and increased activity of the scapular stabilising muscles, despite achieving similar arm positions to the CG. ConclusionYoung-people with shoulder instability have consistent differences in their muscle activity and movement patterns. Consistently observed differences at the shoulder girdle included increased sternoclavicular protraction and elevation accompanied by increased normalised activity of the posterior scapula stabilising muscles and decreased activity of the posterior humeral mobilising muscles. Existing methods of measurement may be used to inform clinical decision making, however, further work is needed evaluate the prognostic and clinical utility of derived 3D and sEMG data for informing decision making within shoulder instability and associated subgroups.

Authors: Fraser Philp, M. Seyres, N. Postans, R. Freeman, A. Pandyan, E. Chadwick

Last Update: 2023-07-16 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.15.23292602

Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.15.23292602.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles