Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Physics# Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics# High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

The Hubble Constant: Current Research Efforts

Scientists are working to clarify the Hubble constant using various cosmic events.

― 5 min read


Hubble Constant ResearchHubble Constant Researchexpansion measurements.New methods aim to clarify cosmic
Table of Contents

The Hubble Constant is a key number in understanding how fast the universe is expanding. It has been measured multiple times through different methods, but the numbers don’t always match up. This disagreement is known as the Hubble tension. To address this issue, researchers are combining data from various cosmic events like Supernovae, Quasars, Gamma-ray Bursts, and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations to get a clearer picture of the Hubble constant and its implications for our understanding of the universe.

What is the Hubble Constant?

The Hubble constant tells us how quickly galaxies are moving away from us as the universe expands. When we look at distant galaxies, we see that the light from them has shifted toward the red end of the spectrum. This shift occurs because the galaxies are moving away from us. The faster a galaxy moves away, the further it is from us. The Hubble constant is the mathematical relationship that helps us calculate this rate of expansion.

Why is There Disagreement?

The Hubble constant has been measured in different ways, with each method giving different results. For example, astronomers use supernovae-exploding stars-to measure distances. They also use the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), which is radiation leftover from the Big Bang. The gap between the measurements from these two methods is what we call the Hubble tension.

Combining Different Data

To tackle this divide, researchers have turned to various cosmic events. Supernovae are a reliable source for measuring distances because of their consistent brightness. Quasars, which are bright and distant objects powered by supermassive black holes, also provide valuable data. Gamma-ray bursts, another powerful cosmic event, offers insights into the early universe. Baryon acoustic oscillations are patterns in the distribution of galaxies that also help in measuring distance. By combining data from these different sources, researchers hope to reduce the uncertainty in measuring the Hubble constant.

Supernovae as Distance Markers

Supernovae, especially type Ia supernovae, are used as "standard candles." This means they have a known brightness, allowing astronomers to determine their distance based on how dim they appear from Earth. By measuring the brightness of thousands of these supernovae, scientists can build a map of the universe's expansion rate.

Understanding Quasars

Quasars are extremely bright and distant objects. They are powered by supermassive black holes at the center of galaxies. Researchers measure the brightness of quasars in different wavelengths of light, such as ultraviolet and X-rays. By comparing their brightness, scientists can extract information about the expansion of the universe.

The Role of Gamma-Ray Bursts

Gamma-ray bursts are among the most energetic events in the universe. These bursts can outshine entire galaxies for a brief period. Their distance can be calculated using their brightness and other characteristics. They provide another layer of data for understanding cosmic expansion.

Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

Baryon acoustic oscillations are ripples in the density of visible matter in the universe. They represent a snapshot of the universe when it was much younger. By measuring the distances between galaxies today, scientists can see these patterns and use them to infer the expansion of the universe.

Statistical Analysis

To analyze all this data, researchers use statistical methods. Traditional statistical methods might not be sufficient due to differences in the data sources. Therefore, newer methods are employed. These can help account for various factors that might skew the results, such as selection biases or the evolution of the universe over time.

The Importance of Likelihoods

In statistics, a likelihood indicates how probable it is to observe the given data under a particular model. When analyzing the Hubble constant, researchers examine various models of the universe-like the flat and non-flat models of cosmic expansion. By using likelihoods, they can find which model best fits the data.

Comparing Models

Different cosmological models have different implications for how the universe behaves. The flat model suggests a universe that will expand forever at a decreasing rate, while a non-flat model indicates that the universe could eventually stop expanding or even start to contract. By analyzing data from supernovae, quasars, gamma-ray bursts, and baryon acoustic oscillations, researchers can assess which model aligns best with observed data.

Current Findings

Recent efforts to combine different datasets suggest that newer methods of analysis lead to more precise estimates of the Hubble constant. By correcting for selection biases and accounting for the evolution of these cosmic events, research shows reduced uncertainties in the measurements.

Exploring Different Evolutions

In the past, researchers might have assumed a "fixed" model for how different cosmic events evolve over time. However, recognizing that these events can change and affect light measurements, researchers are now looking into how the evolution of cosmic events may vary. By examining this varying evolution, researchers can better align their findings with new observations.

Understanding the Cosmic Divide

The divide between the measurements of the Hubble constant is not just a number. It signifies a deeper misunderstanding in our knowledge of physics, cosmology, and the universe’s structure. By using a combination of methods and models, scientists hope to clarify our picture of the universe and better understand its expansion.

The Impact of Data Quality

Quality data is crucial for accurate measurements. High-quality observations lead to better precision. As telescopes and instruments improve, more accurate measurements of supernovae, gamma-ray bursts, and quasars become available. This improved data allows scientists to refine their models accordingly.

Conclusion

Research into the Hubble constant continually evolves as new techniques and data become available. By combining results from supernovae, quasars, gamma-ray bursts, and baryon acoustic oscillations, scientists aim to clarify the understanding of the universe's expansion. Ongoing discussion and investigation highlight the importance of finding consistent results that align existing theories with new data.

Original Source

Title: Reducing the uncertainty on the Hubble constant up to 35\% with an improved statistical analysis: different best-fit likelihoods for Supernovae Ia, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, Quasars, and Gamma-Ray Bursts

Abstract: Cosmological models and their parameters are widely debated, especially about whether the current discrepancy between the values of the Hubble constant, $H_{0}$, obtained by type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), and the Planck data from the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation could be alleviated when alternative cosmological models are considered. Thus, combining high-redshift probes, such as Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and Quasars (QSOs), together with Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and SNe Ia is important to assess the viability of these alternative models and if they can cast further light on the Hubble tension. In this work, for GRBs, we use a 3-dimensional relation between the peak prompt luminosity, the rest-frame time at the end of the X-ray plateau, and its corresponding luminosity in X-rays: the 3D Dainotti fundamental plane relation. Regarding QSOs, we use the Risaliti-Lusso relation among the UV and X-ray luminosities for a sample of 2421 sources. We correct both the QSO and GRB relations by accounting for selection and evolutionary effects with a reliable statistical method. We here use both the traditional Gaussian likelihoods ($\cal L_G$) and the new best-fit likelihoods ($\cal L_N$) to infer cosmological parameters of a non-flat $\Lambda$CDM and flat $w$CDM models. We obtain for all the parameters reduced uncertainties, up to $35\%$ for $H_{0}$, when applying the new $\cal L_N$ likelihoods in place of the Gaussian ones. Our results remain consistent with a flat $\Lambda$CDM model, although with a shift of the dark energy parameter $w$ toward $w

Authors: Maria Giovanna Dainotti, Giada Bargiacchi, Małgorzata Bogdan, Aleksander Łukasz Lenart, Kazunari Iwasaki, Salvatore Capozziello, Bing Zhang, Nissim Fraija

Last Update: 2023-05-17 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10030

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.10030

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles