Balancing Access and Redundancy in Distributed Computation
This research tackles the tradeoff between access efficiency and data redundancy.
― 7 min read
Table of Contents
In today’s digital world, we often handle large sets of data stored across several servers. Linear computations on these datasets have become common, especially in the realm of machine learning where efficiency, robustness, and privacy are essential. One aspect of this process is the way we store these computations, particularly when the numbers involved are limited to a certain set of values.
When we want to store data in a distributed system, our goal is to encode it in such a way that we can perform computations by accessing only a few servers. This method, called the access parameter, is important because the fewer servers we need to reach out to, the more resources remain available for other tasks. However, reducing the number of servers to access often means we need to add more Redundancy to our data-essentially making multiple copies. This tradeoff between access and redundancy is what we explore.
The Challenge of Distributed Computation
In a typical setup, there's a user who has data and wants to leverage the power of servers to store this data and perform computations. At a later time, the user needs to perform certain calculations with the stored data, contact a number of servers, and combine their responses to arrive at the result. The challenge lies in the fact that while the type of computation is known beforehand, the specific details may change.
Various hurdles arise in this setup, such as some servers being slow or failing. To address these issues, the user might add redundancy to their data to keep the system robust. Usually, in existing literature, the assumption is made that the user contacts all servers during the computation process. This can lead to wasted resources if some servers respond late or not at all. By reducing the number of servers contacted, we can allow other servers to attend to different queries or tasks in the meantime.
In our work, we propose coding methodologies that only require the user to contact a smaller portion of the storage servers for each computation. This strategy enhances the efficiency of the system and helps maintain its overall performance.
Understanding the Tradeoff
When data is stored, users may use coding techniques to introduce redundancy to ensure that computations can still be performed even if fewer servers are accessed. A clear tradeoff emerges from this situation: one can drastically reduce the number of servers accessed while increasing redundancy or vice versa.
To put it simply, the user could choose to store the data in such a way that all possible computations can be done by reaching out to fewer servers, acknowledging that this would mean having multiple copies of the data stored. Alternatively, one could simply store the data without redundancy and access all servers whenever needed, thereby losing efficiency.
This work aims to characterize all possible options that fall between these two extremes. The goal is to identify the feasible pairs of access and redundancy levels for various computations of interest.
The Role of Linear Covering Codes
For linear computations, the relationship between access and redundancy can be tied to the existence of linear covering codes. Covering codes are mathematical structures that help us understand how we can effectively structure our data so that we can access it efficiently.
The task becomes quite complex when the coefficients involved in our computations are restricted to a finite set of values. This scenario is particularly relevant for modern applications in machine learning, where having computational efficiency is critical.
Key Contributions
For computations that involve only two different values (like binary values), we have developed some innovative strategies using covering codes. These techniques allow us to outperform existing methods for such computations. Importantly, we show that the same storage scheme can be employed to retrieve any linear combination of these two values, regardless of what those values are. This means that the efficiency of our method does not depend on prior knowledge of the specific coefficients needed.
We also explore the concept of coefficient complexity, a new idea that can measure the difficulty of a set of coefficients. Through this exploration, we can identify coefficient sets with low or high complexity. Interestingly, sequences that follow a simple arithmetic pattern have the lowest complexity, making them particularly useful in practical applications.
The Distributed Computation Setup
In our setup, we have a user who holds the data and wishes to delegate its storage and processing to multiple servers. The user aims to perform computations on this distributed data at some later time. The goal is to ensure that the user can access the necessary servers with minimal effort while maximizing the efficiency of the computations.
At the storage stage, the user encodes the data in a way that ensures any possible computation can be carried out by reaching out to a limited number of servers. It quickly becomes clear that significantly lower access often requires higher redundancy in the system, and vice versa. The challenge in this study is to carve out all solutions that lie between completely redundant and completely efficient.
The Technical Approach
Our approach hinges upon covering codes. These codes are helpful for constructing the systems we need, allowing us to balance access with redundancy effectively. Covering codes create a scenario where every point in a computation can be covered by a few selected points, thereby reducing access needs.
We have therefore focused our attention on these two-valued computations, giving rise to specific protocols that can accommodate them. The technology we introduce is put to the test against existing methods and shows significant improvements in both redundancy and access metrics.
Coefficient Complexity
As we delve deeper into the study, we introduce our concept of coefficient complexity. The idea is that the coefficients we use in our computations can be classified based on how complex they are, which in turn affects how efficiently we can access them when needed.
We present the findings of our analysis, showing that certain configurations of coefficients lead to lower complexities and thereby lower access requirements. Important findings include that geometric sequences often yield high complexities, which makes them less attractive in terms of access.
Joint Computation
An interesting area we explored is the joint computation of multiple two-valued linear combinations. Through systematic investigation, we established a link between these joint computations and the generalized covering radius concept, a newfound approach in coding theory that deals with how far we can stretch our data while maintaining effectiveness.
Application Beyond Linear Computations
Our study extends beyond just linear computations. We found that the methods we developed can also be applied to evaluate more complex multivariate monomials, showcasing the flexibility and applicability of our techniques across various computational settings.
Future Directions
The research opens several intriguing avenues for further exploration. The relationship between complexity and access ratios, particularly as we develop algorithms that assess the complexity of finite sets, presents a significant challenge. We are optimistic that tackling this issue can lead to even more efficient protocols.
Moreover, the quest for lower bounds on access requirements and understanding how various coding techniques can be adapted for practical use in real-world applications are promising future research directions. The reinforcement of joint computations and the exploration of other coding forms like covering codes over larger alphabets should also be examined.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this research dives into the intricate relationship between redundancy and access in distributed systems handling linear computations. By leveraging covering codes and introducing coefficient complexity, we have made strides toward improving the efficiency and robustness of linear computations, particularly in areas like machine learning. The findings not only advance academic inquiries but have tangible implications for practical applications in various computational realms.
Title: Access-Redundancy Tradeoffs in Quantized Linear Computations
Abstract: Linear real-valued computations over distributed datasets are common in many applications, most notably as part of machine learning inference. In particular, linear computations that are quantized, i.e., where the coefficients are restricted to a predetermined set of values (such as $\pm 1$), have gained increasing interest lately due to their role in efficient, robust, or private machine learning models. Given a dataset to store in a distributed system, we wish to encode it so that all such computations could be conducted by accessing a small number of servers, called the access parameter of the system. Doing so relieves the remaining servers to execute other tasks. Minimizing the access parameter gives rise to an access-redundancy tradeoff, where a smaller access parameter requires more redundancy in the system, and vice versa. In this paper, we study this tradeoff and provide several explicit low-access schemes for $\{\pm1\}$ quantized linear computations based on covering codes in a novel way. While the connection to covering codes has been observed in the past, our results strictly outperform the state-of-the-art for two-valued linear computations. We further show that the same storage scheme can be used to retrieve any linear combination with two distinct coefficients -- regardless of what those coefficients are -- with the same access parameter. This universality result is then extended to all possible quantizations with any number of values; while the storage remains identical, the access parameter increases according to a new additive-combinatorics property we call coefficient complexity. We then turn to study the coefficient complexity -- we characterize the complexity of small sets of coefficients, provide bounds, and identify coefficient sets having the highest and lowest complexity.
Authors: Vinayak Ramkumar, Netanel Raviv, Itzhak Tamo
Last Update: 2023-11-22 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.06101
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.06101
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.