Study Reveals Insights on Common Cold Coronaviruses
Research uncovers how cold coronaviruses infect cells and their entry mechanisms.
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by a virus known as SARS-CoV-2, has led to renewed interest in the spike protein of other coronaviruses, especially those that cause mild colds in people. There are four common coronaviruses that usually lead to mild illnesses in healthy individuals but can sometimes lead to more serious health problems in those with underlying conditions or weakened immune systems. These coronaviruses include HCoV-NL63 and HCoV-229E from the alpha group, and HCoV-HKU1 and HCoV-OC43 from the beta group.
These common cold coronaviruses tend to infect individuals during childhood and can reappear in people later in life. They spread widely and have a pattern of transmission that repeats every two years, with at least one alpha and one beta coronavirus circulating each season. Studies show that immunity to these viruses does not last long, usually for about a year, which is why reinfections are common.
Researchers are looking into several important questions related to the immunity against seasonal coronaviruses. These include the role of existing antibodies from past infections in protecting against COVID-19, how these viruses avoid immune responses, the effectiveness of antibodies that neutralize various strains, and how long the immunity lasts after infection or vaccination. While the ability of antibodies to bind to a virus does not always mean they prevent illness, neutralizing antibodies, which stop the virus from entering cells, are more closely linked to protection against disease.
Spike Protein and Virus Entry
Coronaviruses have a spike protein that plays a crucial role in their ability to infect cells. This spike protein has specific regions that help the virus attach to cells and enter them. The spike protein is made of two parts: the S1 and S2 subunits. The S1 subunit has a region that binds to the cell, while the S2 subunit has elements needed for the virus to fuse with the cell membrane.
While there are some systems to study how common cold coronaviruses enter cells, the exact entry mechanisms are not fully understood. To better understand this, researchers created cells that can express the receptors these viruses use to enter. They then looked at what is required for the coronavirus Spike Proteins of HCoV-NL63, 229E, and HKU1 to enter these cells.
Importance of Furin Processing Sites
Researchers examined a specific part of the spike protein called the furin processing site, which is essential for the virus to enter cells. The spike proteins of HCoV-NL63, 229E, and HKU1 contain various configurations of this site. By altering these sites in laboratory settings, they were able to see how these changes affected the virus's ability to infect cells.
Findings on Infectivity
Pseudoviruses created from these coronaviruses showed that changes made to the furin processing site significantly affected their ability to infect cells. For example, if modifications were made to the spike protein of HCoV-NL63, infectivity dropped drastically. Researchers found that even though the spike proteins could still undergo some processing, altering these sites negatively affected how well they could enter target cells.
In the case of HCoV-229E, similar experiments showed that changes to the furin processing site caused a significant reduction in the virus's ability to infect cells. On the other hand, for HCoV-HKU1, the alterations to the furin processing sites resulted in higher infectivity, suggesting that in this case, a different mechanism might be at play.
Understanding Virus Entry Routes
After understanding how the spike proteins work, researchers looked into how these viruses enter human cells. They explored the entry methods of HCoV-NL63, 229E, and HKU1 by using chemical inhibitors that could block certain routes of entry.
HCoV-NL63 Entry Method
For HCoV-NL63, researchers discovered that the virus enters cells using an endosomal route. They confirmed this by using inhibitors that blocked this pathway, leading to reduced infection levels. Unlike SARS-CoV-2, which uses different pathways, HCoV-NL63 infection did not rely on TMPRSS2, a protein that assists some viruses in entering cells.
HCoV-229E Entry Method
HCoV-229E also followed an endosomal route to enter cells. In previous studies, it was noted that this virus can use various proteins to aid its entry, similar to what was found in the current research. This shows a consistent pattern where HCoV-229E utilizes the endocytic pathway to infect cells.
HCoV-HKU1 Entry Method
HCoV-HKU1 presented some interesting findings. It was found responsible for infection in cells expressing TMPRSS2, but similar to HCoV-NL63, the endosomal route was confirmed. Strikingly, HCoV-HKU1 entry did not depend on TMPRSS2's enzymatic activity, which means that while this protein is necessary for entry, it does not need to perform its usual function.
Role of TMPRSS2 in Virus Entry
TMPRSS2 is an important protein that assists various viruses in entering cells. Researchers examined whether it was essential for HCoV-HKU1 and its activity. They found that TMPRSS2, which has an activity domain and other regions, could help HCoV-HKU1 enter without needing its enzymatic function.
Experiments with TMPRSS2 Variants
To probe further, scientists created variations of TMPRSS2 that either had a disabled function or were truncated. When these were placed in cells, there was still a noticeable level of virus entry. This confirmed that TMPRSS2 is not just a helper but plays a multi-faceted role in the entire process.
Understanding Spike Protein Binding
To investigate how the viruses bind to the cells, researchers looked into whether HCoV-HKU1 could interact with both active and inactive forms of TMPRSS2. The results demonstrated that both forms could bind to HCoV-HKU1 spike, reinforcing the idea that spike proteins can rely on structural interactions for effective infection.
Conclusion
The study delved into the mechanisms by which HCoV-NL63, 229E, and HKU1 gain entry into cells. It was revealed that while common coronaviruses like HCoV-NL63 and 229E follow an endosomal route, their entry relies heavily on specific features of their spike proteins. HCoV-HKU1's entry route is also through endosomal pathways but interestingly does not require the usual catalytic functions of TMPRSS2.
The research highlights essential knowledge that can contribute to the understanding of how coronaviruses operate. This information is crucial, especially during pandemics like COVID-19, as it can aid in developing treatments and preventative measures. Further studies in more relevant cell types and real virus models will be needed to fully outline the functionalities of these proteins and the pathways of virus entry.
Title: Characterization of spike processing and entry mechanisms of seasonal human coronaviruses NL63, 229E and HKU1
Abstract: Although much has been learned about the entry mechanism of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the details of entry mechanisms of seasonal human coronaviruses (HCoVs) remain less well understood. In the present study, we established that 293T cell lines that stably express angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE2), aminopeptidase N (APN), or transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) support high level transduction of lentiviral pseudoviruses bearing spike proteins of seasonal HCoVs, HCoV-NL63, -229E, or -HKU1, respectively. Our results showed that entry of HCoV-NL63, -229E and -HKU1 pseudoviruses is sensitive to endosomal acidification inhibitors (chloroquine and NH4Cl), indicating virus entry via the endocytosis route. Although HCoV-HKU1 pseudovirus infection requires TMPRSS2 expression on cell surface, endocytosis-mediated HCoV-HKU1 entry requires the serine protease domain but not the serine protease activity of TMPRSS2. We also show that amino acids in the predicted S1/S2 junctions of spike proteins of HCoV-NL63, and - 229E are essential for optimal entry but non-essential for spike-mediated entry of HCoV-HKU1. Our findings provide insights into entry mechanism of seasonal HCoVs that may support the development of novel treatment strategies. ImportanceDetails of the entry mechanisms of seasonal human coronaviruses (HCoVs) remain to be fully explored. To investigate the entry of HCoV-NL63, -229E and -HKU1 CoVs, we employed 293T cells that stably express angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE2) aminopeptidase N (APN), or transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) to study entry mechanisms of pseudoviruses bearing spike proteins of HCoV-NL63, -229E and - HKU1 respectively. Our results provide new insights into the predicted S1/S2 subunit junctions, cellular receptor, and protease requirements for seasonal HCoV pseudovirus entry via endocytic route and may support the development of novel treatment strategies.
Authors: Wei Wang, S. N. Neerukonda, R. Vassell, S. Lusvarghi, S. Liu, A. Akue, M. Kukuruga, C. D. Weiss
Last Update: 2024-04-15 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.04.12.589332
Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.04.12.589332.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.