Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Computer Science# Artificial Intelligence# Machine Learning

Advancements in Personalized Federated Learning for Healthcare

A new method improves medical models while keeping patient data private.

― 6 min read


Personalized Learning inPersonalized Learning inHealthcareinnovative data privacy methods.Improving patient care through
Table of Contents

Medical data plays a crucial role in diagnosing and treating diseases. However, collecting and sharing this data raises concerns about Privacy. To address this issue, a method called federated learning has emerged. This allows different hospitals and medical institutions to collaborate on creating models while keeping their data private. Each institution can train their own model on their data and only share the results or updates, rather than the actual data.

While federated learning offers a way to protect privacy, it can struggle when the data from different hospitals is not very similar. This difference can lead to models that do not perform as well as expected. This article introduces a new approach to federated learning that aims to improve personalized medical models by considering the similarities in local data while ensuring that patient privacy is maintained.

The Need for Privacy in Medical Data

Many healthcare systems rely on data to inform their decision-making processes. This data includes patient records, medical images, and other sensitive information. When institutions share this data for developing models, there’s a risk that patient information could be exposed, leading to privacy breaches.

Federated learning provides a solution by allowing institutions to collaborate without needing to share sensitive data. Instead, they can work on their models within their systems and share only the necessary information to improve the overall model. This helps to maintain patient confidentiality while still enabling advancements in medical technology.

Challenges in Federated Learning

Though federated learning is promising, it faces several challenges. One of the main problems arises from the differences in data among institutions, often referred to as heterogeneous data. Each hospital may have different patient demographics, types of diseases, and treatment records, leading to challenges in effectively training a universal model.

For instance, a hospital that specializes in cancer treatment may have different data characteristics compared to a general hospital that treats a broader range of conditions. As a result, a model trained on data from one institution may not work well on data from another.

The New Approach: Personalized Federated Learning

To address the challenge of heterogeneous data, a new approach called personalized federated learning has been proposed. This development allows for the creation of models that can adapt to the unique characteristics of local data at each institution while still benefiting from the collective knowledge of the entire network.

By understanding the similarities between local datasets, personalized federated learning can create models that are tailored to meet specific needs. This way, hospitals can continue to benefit from collaborative training while also addressing their individual circumstances.

Components of the Proposed Model

The personalized federated learning approach consists of two main components: the sharing component and the personalized component.

Sharing Component

The sharing component is designed to capture common characteristics across all hospitals. This element benefits from general clinical guidelines and practices that apply to the entire population, ensuring that the model adheres to standard procedures and protocols.

For example, if a patient presents symptoms of an infection, the sharing component might include standard tests that are typically performed, like blood tests. This component ensures that the general knowledge and practices are incorporated into the model, allowing for consistent and reliable care across various hospitals.

Personalized Component

On the other hand, the personalized component focuses on the unique information about individual patients. Factors such as family medical history, allergies, and previous treatment experiences are considered within this component.

For instance, if a patient has a known allergy to a specific medication, this information should be part of their personalized treatment model. The personalized component ensures that the model can consider the unique aspects of each patient's situation, leading to more accurate and effective treatment options.

Communication Efficiency

Effective communication between hospitals is vital for the success of federated learning. However, transmitting large amounts of model updates can be burdensome. To overcome this challenge, a new method has been developed to improve the efficiency of communication.

This method encourages local updates to have a clustering structure, allowing for the sharing of information in a more streamlined way. By reducing the amount of data that needs to be sent back and forth, hospitals can work together more efficiently without overwhelming their systems.

Optimization Framework

The optimization framework for this approach focuses on updating personalized models efficiently. Instead of treating each model update as a separate task, the process involves iteratively improving both the sharing and personalized components together.

This iterative approach helps to ensure that the model is continually adapting and improving based on the new data being collected. By optimizing both components simultaneously, the overall performance of the model can be enhanced while reducing the computational burden on the hospitals involved.

Empirical Studies and Results

Numerous studies have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of this personalized federated learning model. These studies assessed various medical tasks including lung cancer detection, brain tumor segmentation, and clinical risk prediction.

Lung Cancer Detection

In one study, the model was tested on a dataset designed for lung nodule classification. The goal was to determine how well the model could identify lung nodules accurately. The results showed that the personalized federated learning approach significantly outperformed existing methods, indicating that this new approach is more effective in handling the unique characteristics of the data.

Brain Tumor Segmentation

Another study evaluated the model’s effectiveness in brain tumor segmentation. The aim was to assess how well the model could delineate the boundaries of tumors in MRI images. Again, the personalized federated learning method showed superior performance compared to traditional techniques, confirming its adaptability and efficiency.

Clinical Risk Prediction

The final study focused on predicting clinical risks associated with various medical conditions. By analyzing multiple datasets from different hospitals, the model was able to achieve high accuracy in its predictions. The results highlighted the model's ability to integrate diverse medical data while maintaining strong performance in predicting patient outcomes.

Conclusion

The advancements made in personalized federated learning mark an important step toward improving medical data analysis while ensuring patient privacy. This new approach allows hospitals to collaborate more effectively, leading to better models that are tailored to individual patient needs.

By focusing on both sharing and personalized components, as well as improving communication and optimization processes, this model can adapt to the varying characteristics of medical data across different institutions. The empirical studies conducted validate its effectiveness, paving the way for further development and application in real-world medical scenarios.

Future research will continue to explore how to make these models even more adaptive to changing medical data, ensuring that they provide the best possible care for patients. As technology progresses, so too will the methods used in healthcare, ultimately leading to improved outcomes and enhanced patient safety.

Original Source

Title: Medical Federated Model with Mixture of Personalized and Sharing Components

Abstract: Although data-driven methods usually have noticeable performance on disease diagnosis and treatment, they are suspected of leakage of privacy due to collecting data for model training. Recently, federated learning provides a secure and trustable alternative to collaboratively train model without any exchange of medical data among multiple institutes. Therefore, it has draw much attention due to its natural merit on privacy protection. However, when heterogenous medical data exists between different hospitals, federated learning usually has to face with degradation of performance. In the paper, we propose a new personalized framework of federated learning to handle the problem. It successfully yields personalized models based on awareness of similarity between local data, and achieves better tradeoff between generalization and personalization than existing methods. After that, we further design a differentially sparse regularizer to improve communication efficiency during procedure of model training. Additionally, we propose an effective method to reduce the computational cost, which improves computation efficiency significantly. Furthermore, we collect 5 real medical datasets, including 2 public medical image datasets and 3 private multi-center clinical diagnosis datasets, and evaluate its performance by conducting nodule classification, tumor segmentation, and clinical risk prediction tasks. Comparing with 13 existing related methods, the proposed method successfully achieves the best model performance, and meanwhile up to 60% improvement of communication efficiency. Source code is public, and can be accessed at: https://github.com/ApplicationTechnologyOfMedicalBigData/pFedNet-code.

Authors: Yawei Zhao, Qinghe Liu, Xinwang Liu, Kunlun He

Last Update: 2023-06-26 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.14483

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.14483

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles