Luminous Supernovae: Shedding Light on Unusual Explosions
Examining the unique characteristics of luminous Type II supernovae.
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
Hydrogen-rich Type II supernovae, or SNe II, are the most commonly seen type of exploding stars. These explosions occur when massive stars run out of fuel and collapse under their own weight. Although researchers have studied many SNe II, most investigations focus on those that do not reach a brightness over a certain level. Recent sky surveys have discovered more bright SNe II, known as luminous SNe II or LSNe II, which have peak brightness levels greater than 18.5 magnitudes in optical light.
Several theories explain why some SNe II are so bright. One common theory suggests the presence of a central engine, like a magnetar (a type of rapidly spinning neutron star) or a black hole that pulls material from the surroundings. Another theory involves the interaction between the expanding supernova material and the gas surrounding the star, converting kinetic energy (from movement) to light.
This article will examine six LSNe II that possess unusual properties in their hydrogen spectra. The goal is to explore what causes these features and to decide which theory best explains them.
Understanding LSNe II
SNe II are further categorized based on their brightness and how quickly they fade after the explosion. Among these, LSNe II are exceptionally bright. Events are categorized into various groups based on their brightness and how the Light Curves behave over time. For example, some show a gradual decline in brightness, while others drop off quickly. While most previous studies have focused on regular SNe II, there is rising interest in understanding the mechanisms behind the more luminous variants.
Characteristics of LSNe II
The LSNe II selected for this study show fast brightness declines and peculiar hydrogen emissions. They exhibit a lack of the absorption features usually seen in regular SNe II, instead presenting a broad and distorted emission profile. This lack of absorption suggests that the surrounding material around the exploding star might have different densities compared to regular SNe II.
When looking at the light curves, LSNe II tend to show bright beginnings, but then they fade rapidly. By studying their brightness over time, researchers can derive information about the explosions and the stars that caused them.
Study Sample
This work examines six LSNe II-SN 2017cfo, SN 2017gpp, SN 2017hbj, SN 2017hxz, SN 2018aql, and SN 2018eph. These were chosen based on their unique characteristics and the peculiarities observed in their hydrogen spectra.
- SN 2017cfo: This event is notable for a fast decline in brightness and significant hydrogen emission. It lacks typical absorption features, indicating that it may have specific surrounding material characteristics.
- SN 2017gpp: This event shows some narrow lines during its hydrogen emission, indicating possible interactions with surrounding material.
- SN 2017hbj: Its spectra also suggest it lacks absorption features.
- SN 2017hxz: This one has the fastest decline among the selected events, showing marked brightening and quick fading.
- SN 2018aql: The observations indicate interesting behavior but also some contamination from the host galaxy, which may obscure certain properties.
- SN 2018eph: This event shows considerable Spectral evolution over time.
Collectively, these selected SNe II demonstrate a range of behaviors that challenge previous understanding of how these phenomena operate.
Data Collection
The data for this study came from various astronomical surveys and observatories around the world. Observations were made over several years, focusing on obtaining high-quality spectra and photometric measurements. This data allowed researchers to create light curves and analyze the spectral properties of these events.
The light curves show how brightness changes over time after the explosion. Spectral data allow for identification of specific elements and features within the emissions of the supernova. Those elements can tell us about the events leading to the explosion and the conditions surrounding the star before it died.
Spectral Characteristics
The hydrogen emission in all six LSNe II shows a specific pattern: they lack the typical absorption that appears in regular SNe II. This could imply that the surrounding material density is lower than in other events or that these stars underwent unique processes leading to their explosion.
The hydrogen emission profiles became broader over time, indicating rapid changes in the environment around the stars. For typical SNe II, the hydrogen lines display distinct shapes associated with absorption features. However, in LSNe II, these features are either weak or absent, suggesting a more complex interaction between the exploding star and its environment.
Light Curve Analysis
LSNe II are characterized by rapid declines in their light curves. After reaching their peak brightness, they fade away quickly. This behavior suggests they produce a lot of energy initially, but this energy is released in a relatively short time frame.
By comparing the light curves of LSNe II with those of regular SNe II, differences become apparent. The fast decline in brightness for LSNe II indicates that they might emerge from different progenitor stars or interact with their surroundings in unique ways.
Implications for Progenitor Models
The evidence suggests that LSNe II could arise from red supergiant stars that lose significant mass before exploding. The interaction between the explosion and the surrounding material plays an important role in shaping the light curve and spectrum of these events.
A low-density circumstellar medium (the material around the star) likely contributes to the brightness seen in LSNe II. In dense surrounding material, broad emission features could be produced without the expected narrow lines, indicating different interaction dynamics.
Comparison with Other SNe
When LSNe II are compared with other supernovae groups, notable differences appear. Other classes, such as SNe IIn (which show strong emission lines), demonstrate significant spectral features that are not seen in LSNe II. This distinction may suggest a difference in either the explosion mechanics or the conditions leading up to the explosion.
While LSNe II share some characteristics with other luminous supernovae, their unique spectral profiles and rapid brightness declines distinguish them from regular SNe II and other types.
Conclusion
LSNe II represent a fascinating class of supernovae that defy typical characteristics associated with their kind. Their rapid brightness decline, peculiar hydrogen emissions, and lack of expected spectral features suggest that they originate from different progenitor conditions and interactions with the surrounding environment.
Further research into these luminous events could deepen the understanding of supernova mechanics, star evolution, and the conditions necessary for observing such extraordinary brightness. The ongoing observation campaigns will continue to reveal more about the exciting phenomena surrounding these cosmic explosions.
As researchers delve deeper into the nature of LSNe II, they contribute to a broader understanding of the life cycles of massive stars and the dramatic fates that await them. Each new observation and analysis sheds light on the mysteries of the universe, enhancing our grasp of the dynamic processes at play in the cosmos.
Title: Broad-emission-line dominated hydrogen-rich luminous supernovae
Abstract: Hydrogen-rich Type II supernovae (SNe II) are the most frequently observed class of core-collapse SNe (CCSNe). However, most studies that analyse large samples of SNe II lack events with absolute peak magnitudes brighter than -18.5 mag at rest-frame optical wavelengths. Thanks to modern surveys, the detected number of such luminous SNe II (LSNe II) is growing. There exist several mechanisms that could produce luminous SNe II. The most popular propose either the presence of a central engine (a magnetar gradually spinning down or a black hole accreting fallback material) or the interaction of supernova ejecta with circumstellar material (CSM) that turns kinetic energy into radiation energy. In this work, we study the light curves and spectral series of a small sample of six LSNe II that show peculiarities in their H$\alpha$ profile, to attempt to understand the underlying powering mechanism. We favour an interaction scenario with CSM that is not dense enough to be optically thick to electron scattering on large scales -- thus, no narrow emission lines are observed. This conclusion is based on the observed light curve (higher luminosity, fast decline, blue colours) and spectral features (lack of persistent narrow lines, broad H$\alpha$ emission, lack of H$\alpha$ absorption, weak or nonexistent metal lines) together with comparison to other luminous events available in the literature. We add to the growing evidence that transients powered by ejecta-CSM interaction do not necessarily display persistent narrow emission lines.
Authors: P. J. Pessi, J. P. Anderson, G. Folatelli, L. Dessart, S. González-Gaitán, A. Möller, C. P. Gutiérrez, S. Mattila, T. M. Reynolds, P. Charalampopoulos, A. V. Filippenko, L. Galbany, A. Gal-Yam, M. Gromadzki, D. Hiramatsu, D. A. Howell, C. Inserra, E. Kankare, R. Lunnan, L. Martinez, C. McCully, N. Meza, T. E. Müller-Bravo, M. Nicholl, C. Pellegrino, G. Pignata, J. Sollerman, B. E. Tucker, X. Wang, D. R. Young
Last Update: 2023-06-15 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08880
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.08880
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/lasilla/instruments/efosc/inst/Efosc2Grisms.html
- https://github.com/svalenti/pessto
- https://github.com/LCOGT
- https://fallingstar-data.com/forcedphot/
- https://faraday.uwyo.edu/~chip/misc/Cosmo2/cosmo.cgi
- https://gpy.readthedocs.io/en/deploy/
- https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/help/objresult_help.html#DerivedValues
- https://www.legacysurvey.org/dr7/description/
- https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu
- https://www.wiserep.org
- https://archive.eso.org/scienceportal/home