Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Physics# Fluid Dynamics

Modeling Non-Ideal Fluid Behavior in Simulations

A new method improves fluid interaction modeling in various applications.

― 7 min read


Fluid Behavior SimulationFluid Behavior SimulationMethodinteraction accuracy.Innovative approach enhances fluid
Table of Contents

In this article, we discuss a method to model how Fluids behave when they are not ideal and how different fluids interact with solids. This is important in many real-world applications, including processes like 3D printing, boiling, and building materials. The behavior of fluids can vary dramatically, from large-scale movements to tiny movements at the microscopic level.

The challenge arises when trying to simulate how droplets spread on surfaces. Traditional methods struggle with this because they often treat the boundary between two fluids as a sharp line, which does not accurately reflect what happens in real scenarios. We present a way to handle these issues using a new boundary condition that takes into account the energy associated with the wetting process.

Fluid Behavior and Simulation Challenges

When fluids come into contact with a solid surface, they can spread, form droplets, or form bubbles depending on various factors, such as the angle at which they meet the surface and the type of fluids involved. This behavior is critical in many industries where controlling fluid interactions can significantly affect product quality and efficiency.

Existing methods to study these interactions have some limitations. For instance, some methods treat the edge of a droplet or bubble as a distinct boundary. However, this doesn't accurately capture how fluids behave at such boundaries. To better simulate these interactions, we have developed a method based on energy principles that provides a more accurate picture of how fluids spread and separate.

New Approach to Wetting Energy

Our new boundary condition reflects the Energies involved when fluids interact with solid surfaces. This method allows us to keep track of how energy is shared between a liquid droplet and the solid surface it rests on. It also helps us understand how the shapes of droplets and bubbles change over time.

Quantifying this energy requires considering both the energy from the fluid itself and the energy from its interaction with the surface. By using this approach, our Simulations can recover the behavior of droplets more effectively than traditional methods.

The Van der Waals Model

The Van der Waals model gives us a way to understand how fluids behave in multi-phase systems, where different phases, such as liquids and gases, coexist. This model improves upon traditional ideal gas laws by factoring in interactions between particles that occur in real fluids.

In our simulations, we employ this model to separate a single type of fluid into different phases based on their densities. This allows us to see how one phase might spread over another or separate completely, which is common in real-world scenarios.

Importance of Boundary Conditions

Boundary conditions play a crucial role in simulations. They dictate how fluids behave at their edges, where they meet a solid surface. Different boundary conditions can lead to different results in simulations, which is why it’s essential to choose the right one.

Our proposed energy-based boundary condition takes into account the mixing of fluid contact lines and the energies involved at the boundaries. By using this condition, we can simulate how fluids behave more accurately, capturing the intricate dynamics that occur as droplets spread or vapor separates from liquid.

Mathematical Model Overview

To model fluid behavior, we rely on governing equations. These equations describe how fluid density and momentum change over time and space. By applying these equations, we can simulate and visualize how fluids move and interact with one another, as well as with their environment.

The primary equations involve a continuity equation that ensures mass is conserved and momentum equations that describe how forces act on the fluid.

Numerical Method Used in the Simulation

We used a numerical method known as an explicit finite difference method. This approach allows us to simulate the fluid’s behavior over time. By breaking down the problem into smaller parts, we can see how changes in one part affect the others, capturing the dynamics of fluid interaction more effectively.

Additionally, we implemented adaptive mesh refinement, which allows us to adjust the resolution of our simulations based on the needs of the specific areas being modeled. This ensures that we are concentrating our computational resources where they are most needed, enhancing efficiency.

Testing Our Method

To validate our simulation method, we conducted several tests. One key test involved simulating a single droplet of fluid in a gas. We started with a droplet of a certain radius and observed how it behaved as it settled into an equilibrium state, comparing our results with known theoretical solutions.

In another test, we explored the separation of liquid and vapor phases. Here, we began with a mixture of the two and let them evolve over time to see how they separated. The aim was to see if our simulation could accurately capture this separation process, which is vital in many industrial applications.

Results of Simulations

Through various tests, our simulations demonstrated a high degree of accuracy in predicting how fluids behave. For the single droplet test, we found our results aligned closely with expected theoretical outcomes. This confirmed that our new boundary condition improved the accuracy of the simulations.

Similarly, the liquid-vapor separation simulations showed a promising match with theoretical predictions. This suggests that our method is capable of handling complex fluid dynamics effectively.

Contact Angle and Wetting Dynamics

The contact angle is a significant factor in wetting dynamics. It indicates how well a liquid droplet spreads on a surface. High Contact Angles suggest that a droplet does not spread well, while low angles indicate good spreading behavior.

In our study, we aimed to simulate contact angles and observed how they changed over time as droplets evolved. Our energy-based boundary condition allowed us to maintain accurate contact angles during these changes, further validating the effectiveness of our approach.

Observations on Energy Evolution

Throughout our simulations, we monitored the energy in the system. Energy conservation is critical in understanding fluid behavior, especially in the context of how droplets and bubbles evolve.

We tracked the kinetic energy of droplets and their surface energy to see how they fluctuated as fluid systems approached equilibrium. Our results revealed that while energy fluctuated during the evolution, they converged towards stable values as the system reached its final state.

Comparison with Other Methods

In comparing our new energy-based boundary condition with traditional methods, we noted significant differences in performance. Some existing methods struggled to maintain accurate final states, especially under certain conditions. Our method proved to be more robust, providing consistent results and demonstrating greater stability.

This robustness is essential in practical applications where precision in modeling fluid interactions can lead to better outcomes in industrial processes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our research presents an explicit finite difference method for simulating non-ideal multi-phase fluid flow. The proposed boundary condition based on energy principles improves the accuracy of fluid interaction models.

Through testing, we have shown that this method can effectively simulate scenarios like droplet spreading and liquid-vapor separation. The results suggest that our approach offers a more reliable tool for industries that depend on fluid behavior, paving the way for enhanced modeling in engineering and technology.

By continuing to refine and develop these models, we can better understand fluid dynamics, leading to improvements in various applications, from manufacturing to environmental science.

Original Source

Title: General wetting energy boundary condition in a fully explicit non-ideal fluids solver

Abstract: We present an explicit finite difference method to simulate the non-ideal multi-phase fluid flow. The local density and the momentum transport are modeled by the Navier-Stokes (N-S) equations and the pressure is computed by the Van der Waals equation of the state (EOS). The static droplet and the dynamics of liquid-vapor separation simulations are performed as validations of this numerical scheme. In particular, to maintain the thermodynamic consistency, we propose a general wetting energy boundary condition at the contact line between fluids and the solid boundary. We conduct a series of comparisons between the current boundary condition and the constant contact angle boundary condition as well as the stress-balanced boundary condition. This boundary condition alleviates the instability induced by the constant contact angle boundary condition at $\theta \approx0 $ and $\theta \approx \pi$. Using this boundary condition, the equilibrium contact angle is correctly recovered and the contact line dynamics are consistent with the simulation by applying a stress-balanced boundary condition. Nevertheless, unlike the stress-balanced boundary condition for which we need to further introduce the interface thickness parameter, the current boundary condition implicitly incorporates the interface thickness information into the wetting energy.

Authors: Chunheng Zhao, Alexandre Limare, Stephane Zaleski

Last Update: 2023-07-10 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04829

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.04829

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles