Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Computer Science# Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Strengthening Object Detection Against Adversarial Attacks

New methods improve object detection systems' resistance to adversarial changes.

― 5 min read


Fortifying ObjectFortifying ObjectDetection Systemsadversarial threats.New strategies enhance defenses against
Table of Contents

Object Detection is an important part of computer vision, helping systems recognize and classify objects in images. This technology is used in many areas, including self-driving cars and security systems. However, current object detection systems can be tricked by small changes to the images, known as Adversarial Attacks. This can lead to incorrect object recognition, which raises concerns about their reliability.

Research into making object detectors more robust against these attacks is not as advanced as that for image Classification models. Most of the recent work has focused on enhancing classification models, without applying those findings to object detection. This article discusses new methods to improve the Robustness of object detection systems by using knowledge from adversarially trained classification models.

The Problem with Current Object Detectors

Traditional object detection systems are based on models that learn from large datasets. They work by identifying where objects are in images and what those objects are. Despite significant improvements in their Performance, these systems are still vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Such attacks can manipulate input images in almost invisible ways, leading to mistakes in object location and identification.

Many defense strategies have been developed for image classification, but fewer have been designed specifically for object detection. The existing strategies often require a lot of computing power and time to set up defenses against attacks.

Our Approach

We aim to enhance the robustness of object detection systems using adversarially trained classification models. By replacing the usual backbone of an object detection model with one that has been pre-trained to be robust, we can improve its defense against adversarial attacks without increasing the computational load.

However, simply swapping the backbones does not guarantee improved robustness. The new model tends to forget the robustness it had against adversarial attacks. To fix this, we propose a technique called Free Robust Object Detection (FROD). This method includes easy changes to the classification backbone to keep its defensive capabilities intact.

To further boost the robustness, we also introduce two new training components: imitation loss and delayed adversarial training. These components are designed to enhance the training process without putting extra strain on computing resources.

Method Description

Modifications to the Backbone

The backbone of an object detector is essential because it extracts features from images for classification and localization. When we replace a standard backbone with a robust counterpart, we make two key modifications.

  1. Layer Management: We retrain fewer layers of the backbone while keeping others frozen to avoid loss of the robust features learned during previous training. Our experiments suggest that keeping either zero or one layer retrained is the best way to maintain robustness.

  2. Batch Normalization: Batch normalization helps the model learn better by standardizing the input data. Updating these stats can significantly improve the robustness of the object detector. We found that allowing the batch normalization layers to update during the new training phase plays a crucial role in boosting performance.

Imitation Loss

To strike a balance between using robustness and allowing the system to learn from new data, we introduce an imitation loss mechanism. This allows the model to refer back to the robust features of the fixed backbone while still adapting to the new data.

Delayed Adversarial Training

Our approach also includes a delayed adversarial training phase where we start training on regular examples before switching to adversarial ones. This method allows the model to build a solid foundation before facing challenging inputs, which helps strengthen its defenses without requiring extensive computational resources.

Experiment Setup

We evaluated our approach using two well-known object detection datasets: Pascal VOC and MS-COCO. For Pascal VOC, we trained on about 16,000 images, whereas for MS-COCO, we used around 120,000 images. Both datasets cover various object types and provide a solid basis for measuring model performance.

Evaluation Metrics

To measure the effectiveness of our models, we used mean average precision (mAP). This metric helps to quantify how well the model can detect and classify objects across different inputs.

Results

Our experiments show that our FROD and FROD-DAT methods achieve high robustness and strong performance compared to existing state-of-the-art models while requiring minimal additional computation.

Comparison with Other Methods

When we compared our methods to others, we found that they performed similarly or better in terms of robustness and accuracy. For instance, the FROD-DAT method achieved significantly higher clean mAP while maintaining strong robustness against adversarial attacks.

Single-Stage vs Two-Stage Detectors

Our methods are flexible and can be applied to both single-stage and two-stage detectors. We ran tests using both types and found that the improvements worked effectively across the board.

Handling Transferred Attacks

We also tested how well our models coped with transferred attacks, a specific type of black-box attack. The results indicated that our methods could successfully defend against these types of threats.

Visual Insights

To better understand how our model performs, we visually compared the predictions made by standard training methods versus ours. We found that the standard models often misidentified or hallucinated objects when faced with adversarial attacks. In contrast, our methods showed robustness by correctly identifying objects even under duress.

Common Mistakes

Despite the success of our methods, they are not perfect. Some models still miss objects, mislabel them, or fail to detect smaller items. We compiled a list of common errors, which serves as a guide for future improvements.

Conclusion

In this article, we presented methods to improve the robustness of object detectors against adversarial attacks. By leveraging adversarially trained classification models and making strategic modifications, we established a framework that enhances both performance and reliability without a significant increase in computing costs. Our results are promising and suggest that our approach can provide a solid foundation for making object detection systems more secure and effective in real-world scenarios.

Original Source

Title: FROD: Robust Object Detection for Free

Abstract: Object detection is a vital task in computer vision and has become an integral component of numerous critical systems. However, state-of-the-art object detectors, similar to their classification counterparts, are susceptible to small adversarial perturbations that can significantly alter their normal behavior. Unlike classification, the robustness of object detectors has not been thoroughly explored. In this work, we take the initial step towards bridging the gap between the robustness of classification and object detection by leveraging adversarially trained classification models. Merely utilizing adversarially trained models as backbones for object detection does not result in robustness. We propose effective modifications to the classification-based backbone to instill robustness in object detection without incurring any computational overhead. To further enhance the robustness achieved by the proposed modified backbone, we introduce two lightweight components: imitation loss and delayed adversarial training. Extensive experiments on the MS-COCO and Pascal VOC datasets are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach.

Authors: Muhammad, Awais, Weiming, Zhuang, Lingjuan, Lyu, Sung-Ho, Bae

Last Update: 2023-08-03 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01888

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.01888

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles