New Insights on Drug Use and Intracranial Aneurysms
Research links certain drugs to risks of intracranial aneurysms and strokes.
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
An Intracranial Aneurysm (IA) is a balloon-like bulge in a blood vessel in the brain. When this bulge bursts, it can lead to a type of stroke called aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (ASAH). This condition can occur in younger people and can have serious consequences, both for health and finances. Preventing ASAH is important, especially since treating unruptured IAs can reduce the risk of bleeding. However, procedures to treat IAs can sometimes cause complications that are worse than the potential benefits. Therefore, safer ways to prevent ASAH are needed.
Currently, there are no medications specifically designed to stop IAs from growing or bursting. Understanding genetic factors can help identify potential drug targets that might lead to new medications. Risk factors such as smoking and high blood pressure are known to play a role in developing IAs and ASAH, but Genetics also significantly influence these conditions. This suggests that studying the genetic aspects of IAs could provide insights into drug development.
In earlier work, researchers identified some connections between IAs and certain drugs used to treat epilepsy. This research focused on a specific gene, CNNM2, which was linked to this connection. The goal now is to find more drug classes that might be useful in treating or preventing IA and ASAH.
Genetic Approach to Drug Discovery
To investigate this, a two-step genetic approach was used. First, researchers looked at the genetic connections between drug use and the risk of having IAs, breaking it down into unruptured IAs and ASAH as separate groups. They aimed to find any new mechanisms that could help provide therapy options and did not focus on blood pressure (BP) in this part of the study.
Next, for the drug classes linked to IAs independent of BP, researchers used genetic information to figure out if using these drugs could have a direct effect on the risk of developing IAs. This assessment method is called Mendelian randomization (MR). It helps determine causality-whether drug use might lead to IAs-under certain conditions.
The study used a variety of genetic techniques, especially focusing on MR. Only publicly available data was used, ensuring all participants had provided consent for their information to be analyzed.
Method Overview
Researchers collected summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for 23 different drug traits, along with data for ASAH, unruptured IAs, and BP. The goal was to analyze whether BP played a role in the association between drug use and IAs.
To ensure BP's effect was accounted for, researchers conditioned the drug use data on both systolic and diastolic BP. This step helped clarify which drug classes were truly associated with IAs and were not just correlated due to high BP.
When looking at genetic links between drug usage and IA, genetic correlation was measured. This correlation indicates how much two traits share common genetic factors. A correlation of 1 means complete overlap, while 0 means no overlap at all.
Key Findings on Drug Usage and IA
Several drug classes were found to have genetic correlations with IAs when BP was taken into consideration. These included Antidepressants, Paracetamol, acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), opioid medications, beta-blockers, and drugs used for digestive issues. Notably, paracetamol and acetylsalicylic acid were specifically highlighted, as they are the main drugs in their respective classes.
For the beta-blockers, initial analyses suggested a potential causal effect on IAs, but further examination showed that this association was likely due to BP rather than a direct effect.
When investigating drug response effects, researchers analyzed how well patients responded to different drugs in relation to their chances of developing IAs. This analysis included various drug classes, examining how genetic factors could indicate a person's response to treatment and whether this response mattered for IA risk.
Observations on Antidepressants and IA Risk
Among the drug classes, antidepressants stood out. The results showed that individuals who were predicted to respond well to these drugs had an increased risk of developing IAs. This suggests a possible negative effect linked with antidepressant use. However, in non-users of antidepressants, no such risk was observed.
The mechanisms behind this correlation are still unclear. The findings raise questions about whether this effect is due to the drugs themselves or other underlying factors such as varying types of depression that could also influence IA risk. More research is needed to establish a clearer picture and to explore the relationship between depression, antidepressants, and strokes.
Insights on Paracetamol and Other Drug Classes
Interestingly, a novel link was found between genetic predisposition to paracetamol usage and IA risk. While paracetamol is often considered a safe pain reliever, this association suggests it may have underlying effects that need investigation. Existing studies have proposed that paracetamol could potentially protect against other types of strokes, but evidence regarding its impact on ASAH specifically remains limited.
For other drug classes studied, the patterns observed showed that the connections made could be due to shared genetic risks rather than direct causal effects. This was particularly noted for drugs treating gastrointestinal conditions and opioid medications, where the usage often correlates with chronic pain, which itself could lead to higher IA risk.
Conclusion and Future Directions
In summary, the research uncovered important connections between certain drug classes, particularly antidepressants and paracetamol, and the risk of developing IAs and ASAH. The findings suggest a potential risk-increasing effect of antidepressants warranting further exploration in larger studies.
Future research should focus on clarifying these relationships and the potential underlying mechanisms, particularly regarding the influence of depression as a risk factor for IAs. Understanding these connections may lead to better risk evaluation and potentially new therapeutic options for preventing ASAH.
Overall, the investigation provides valuable insights into how gene-drug interactions may shape the development of IAs, guiding future studies toward unraveling complex genetic and environmental factors involved in these serious health conditions.
Title: Drug classes affecting intracranial aneurysm risk: genetic correlation and Mendelian randomization
Abstract: Abstract and key wordsO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSThere is no non-invasive treatment option to prevent aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (ASAH) caused by intracranial aneurysm (IA) rupture. We aimed to identify drug classes that may affect liability to IA using a genetic approach. MethodsWe obtained genome-wide association summary statistics for unruptured IA (N=2,140 cases), ASAH (N=5,140 cases), and the combined group (N=7,495 cases; N=71,934 controls in all groups), and drug usage from 23 drug classes (N up to 320,000) based on European-ancestry cohorts. We calculated genetic correlation between IA and ASAH, and liability to drug usage independent of the risk factor high blood pressure. Next, we evaluated the causality and therapeutic potential of independent correlated drug classes using three different Mendelian randomization frameworks. ResultsBlood pressure-independent correlations with IA were found for antidepressants, paracetamol, acetylsalicylic acid, opioids, beta-blockers, and peptic ulcer and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease drugs. MR showed that the genetically predicted usage of none of these drug classes were causally related to IA. Genetically predicted high responders to antidepressant drugs were at higher risk of IA (odds ratio [OR]=1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.09-2.39, P=0.018) and ASAH (OR=1.68, 95%CI=1.07-2.65, P=0.024) if they used antidepressant drugs. This effect was absent in non-users. For beta-blockers, additional analyses showed that this effect was not independent of blood pressure after all. Genetic liability to chronic multisite pain, an indication for pain medication (paracetamol, acetylsalicylic acid, and opioids), was associated with increased IA risk (OR=1.63, 95%CI=1.24-2.14), but not consistently across sensitivity analyses. ConclusionsWe did not find drugs decreasing liability to IA and ASAH but did find that antidepressant drugs may increase liability. In addition, we observed pleiotropy between IA, chronic pain, and pain medication usage, but the driving factor for this pleiotropy remains to be determined. Our results help to better understanding pathogenic mechanisms underlying IA.
Authors: Mark K. Bakker, Y. M. Ruigrok, J. H. Veldink
Last Update: 2023-10-25 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.10.23.23297443
Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.10.23.23297443.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.