Analyzing Consumer Complaints to Improve Services
Using technology to reveal overlooked consumer concerns in complaint data.
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
Detecting problems in consumer Complaints is important for improving services. Consumer complaints provide insights into issues faced by individuals in various industries, especially the insurance sector. This article discusses a method that uses technology to find patterns in complaints, particularly when companies don't offer resolutions.
The Need for Complaint Analysis
Consumer complaints are vital for regulating businesses. They help authorities spot bad practices, such as misleading sales or delayed payments. For instance, in 2021, thousands of complaints were filed across various industries. By reviewing this Data, regulators can decide if a company needs to be investigated for its actions. Besides regulatory purposes, these complaints also reflect the quality of customer service.
Certain industries consistently receive poor ratings, and this is where complaint databases came into play. These databases help collect complaints from consumers, making it easier for companies and regulators to identify areas for improvement. Analyzing these complaints can help organizations understand how to serve their customers better and address their concerns.
Collecting and Cleaning Data
For our analysis, we focused on a specific set of complaints from a government database over multiple years. The goal was to identify which complaints were valid and received help from the companies involved. The first step was to filter the complaints to a manageable size, focusing on those with specific dollar amounts that were likely related to individual accounts.
Next, we cleaned the collected data, which involved several steps:
- Changing all letters to lowercase.
- Removing unnecessary punctuation marks, except for those that convey strong emotions.
- Deleting common words that do not add value to the Sentiment of the complaint.
- Excluding complaints that started with "thank you."
- Removing financial figures to streamline the content.
By cleaning the data this way, we set the stage for a more accurate analysis of sentiment behind customer complaints.
Analyzing Complaints with Technology
To find out which complaints companies ignored, we used advanced techniques from natural language processing. This approach allowed us to categorize complaints into two groups: those that received help and those that didn’t. We created a system that could analyze text and identify patterns that pointed to complaints that businesses chose to overlook.
We tested multiple methods of Classification to see which worked best. This involved splitting our dataset into training and testing groups multiple times to check how well each method performed. The initial results showed a consistent pattern, which indicated that we could identify non-responsive complaints effectively.
Turning Text into Numbers
Once we had identified the complaints, we needed to translate the text into numbers to analyze it more easily. This involved calculating a sentiment score for each complaint, which showed the emotion behind the narrative. By combining various metrics, such as the count of complaint words and measured dollar amounts, we aimed to create a comprehensive picture of each complaint's context.
We used two methods to translate the text into numerical data. The first relied solely on the frequency of words used in the complaints. The second combined this frequency with the sentiment scores derived from the language used in the complaints. This comprehensive approach allowed us to get a clearer understanding of the complaints and determine which ones were likely to be ignored.
Evaluating Classification Methods
To improve our classification of complaints, we tested five different classification techniques. Each method had unique strengths and weaknesses, but we aimed to find the best one for identifying the complaints that were overlooked. We evaluated the performance of each technique based on how accurately they could distinguish between valid complaints and those that were ignored.
We utilized confusion matrices, a tool for measuring the success of classification methods. By taking thousands of samples and repeating our tests, we were able to see which methods consistently performed best. Overall, we concluded that the methods using sentiment analysis performed well, but there were distinctions in how effectively they classified complaints based on the data features we provided.
The Impact of Sentiment Analysis
Sentiment analysis played a crucial role in evaluating consumer complaints. It allowed us to categorize complaints based on their emotional tone, thus helping determine whether companies were choosing to ignore valid concerns. This analysis was significant because it pointed out that the emotional weight of words used in complaints could influence whether or not a company took action.
The sentiment scores were essential during our classification process. By integrating sentiment with the other numerical features, we strengthened our ability to detect patterns and anomalies in the complaints. This combined approach resulted in a richer dataset that provided a deeper look into the nature of consumer issues.
Uncovering Patterns in Complaint Data
Once we had numerical representations of the complaint data, we established indices to detect systematic anomalies. This means we were looking for complaints that appeared to be valid but were often neglected by companies. The indices allowed us to quantify the extent of these anomalies and understand their significance in the overall dataset.
By continuously applying these methods, we were able to create a clearer picture of which complaints were more likely to be addressed and which ones were ignored. This process involved looking at how the data behaved over time and identifying any trends that suggested lapses in company responses to consumer concerns.
Conclusions from the Analysis
Our findings highlighted the importance of integrating advanced technologies in analyzing consumer complaints. By transforming text into quantifiable data and employing sentiment analysis, we uncovered valuable insights into the complaints that businesses often overlooked. These insights can inform both regulators and companies on how to better serve their customers and address their grievances.
Through systematic tracking and analysis, we can enhance the response to consumer complaints. This process not only aids in the regulatory aspect but also improves overall customer service, allowing businesses to better connect with their clients. By prioritizing complaints that show genuine concern, companies can mitigate risks and foster trust with their consumers.
As we continue to refine these methods, the goal is to create a comprehensive framework that improves how businesses handle complaints and serves as a tool for regulators aiming for fair treatment of consumers. The underlying technology has the potential to reshape the way companies approach customer feedback, ensuring that no valid complaint goes unnoticed.
Title: NLP-based detection of systematic anomalies among the narratives of consumer complaints
Abstract: We develop an NLP-based procedure for detecting systematic nonmeritorious consumer complaints, simply called systematic anomalies, among complaint narratives. While classification algorithms are used to detect pronounced anomalies, in the case of smaller and frequent systematic anomalies, the algorithms may falter due to a variety of reasons, including technical ones as well as natural limitations of human analysts. Therefore, as the next step after classification, we convert the complaint narratives into quantitative data, which are then analyzed using an algorithm for detecting systematic anomalies. We illustrate the entire procedure using complaint narratives from the Consumer Complaint Database of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Authors: Peiheng Gao, Ning Sun, Xuefeng Wang, Chen Yang, Ričardas Zitikis
Last Update: 2024-03-26 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11138
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.11138
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://doi.org/10.1145/280765.280786
- https://www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/consumer-complaints/
- https://www.minneapolisfed.org/about-us/monetary-policy/inflation-calculator/consumer-price-index-1913-
- https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=8999288
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2019.1649155
- https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/publication-sta-bb-volume-one.pdf
- https://content.naic.org/state-insurance-departments
- https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4035168
- https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026526
- https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2674