Securing FPGAs: Fuzzing Techniques and Challenges
Learn how fuzzing can identify vulnerabilities in FPGA configurations, particularly in Xilinx devices.
― 4 min read
Table of Contents
- What are FPGAs?
- Importance of FPGA Security
- What is Fuzzing?
- Applying Fuzzing to FPGA Security
- The Challenge of Fuzzing FPGAs
- Understanding FPGA Configuration Engines
- Risks Associated with Configuration Engines
- Fuzzing Framework for FPGA Configuration Engines
- Developing Fuzzing Strategies
- The Process of Fuzzing
- Evaluating Fuzzing Results
- Discovering New Vulnerabilities
- Case Study: The Starbleed Attack
- Importance of Proper Configuration
- Future Considerations for FPGA Security
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAS) are vital components in many digital systems today. They are flexible and can be programmed to perform various tasks even after being made. However, as their usage increases, so do concerns about their security. This article aims to provide a clearer picture of how Fuzzing can be applied to identify Vulnerabilities in FPGA configuration engines, particularly focusing on Xilinx devices.
What are FPGAs?
FPGAs are a type of integrated circuit that can be configured by the user after manufacturing. This means that users can load their digital designs into the FPGA, allowing for a wide range of applications. FPGAs consist of a grid of programmable logic blocks, which can be interconnected to carry out specific tasks.
Importance of FPGA Security
As FPGAs are used in sensitive applications like industrial control systems, cloud computing, and military operations, ensuring their security is critical. If an attacker successfully compromises an FPGA, they could manipulate its functions, leading to catastrophic consequences.
What is Fuzzing?
Fuzzing is a testing technique used to discover vulnerabilities in software and hardware systems. It works by inputting random or unexpected data into a system to see how it behaves. If this process uncovers unexpected results, it may indicate potential security issues.
Applying Fuzzing to FPGA Security
Historically, fuzzing has been primarily used in the software domain, with limited application in hardware. This article discusses how fuzzing can be adapted to work on FPGA configuration engines.
The Challenge of Fuzzing FPGAs
One of the main challenges in fuzzing FPGAs is the lack of access to detailed design information. Fuzzing usually requires knowledge about how the target system is designed, but with FPGAs, this information may not be readily available.
Understanding FPGA Configuration Engines
An FPGA configuration engine is responsible for loading the programming data, known as the bitstream, into the FPGA. This engine manages the process of configuring the FPGA with the desired design.
Risks Associated with Configuration Engines
Configuration engines have their own vulnerabilities that can expose the FPGA to attacks. If an attacker can manipulate the bitstream or take control of the configuration engine, they can potentially compromise the entire FPGA.
Fuzzing Framework for FPGA Configuration Engines
To apply fuzzing effectively, a specialized framework is needed. The idea is to create a system that generates random Bitstreams and sends them to the FPGA to observe how the configuration engine reacts. This framework should be able to identify crashes or abnormal behaviors that suggest vulnerabilities.
Developing Fuzzing Strategies
When fuzzing an FPGA configuration engine, it is important to have clear strategies. The following are three main strategies identified in the context of this work:
Bitstream Structure: This strategy focuses on the general layout of the bitstream to uncover undocumented components.
Inter Command: This approach examines how different commands in the bitstream interact with each other.
Intra Command: This strategy investigates individual commands within the bitstream to understand their effects better.
The Process of Fuzzing
The fuzzing process involves several stages. First, a specific fuzzing strategy is selected. Then, bitstreams are generated and sent to the FPGA through the configuration engine. Monitoring the FPGA's responses will help identify any crashes or unusual behaviors.
Evaluating Fuzzing Results
After running fuzzing tests, the results must be carefully analyzed. This involves examining any crashes that occurred and understanding the circumstances that led to them. By doing so, it is possible to gather insights into the vulnerabilities of the FPGA configuration engine.
Discovering New Vulnerabilities
One of the significant outcomes of applying fuzzing is the discovery of new vulnerabilities. For example, an attack known as "JustSTART" was identified, which allows attackers to bypass RSA authentication in Xilinx UltraScale FPGAs.
Case Study: The Starbleed Attack
The Starbleed attack is another significant vulnerability discovered through fuzzing. This attack exploits a flaw that allows unauthorized commands to be executed before their legitimacy is verified. This could lead to a loss of data confidentiality and integrity.
Importance of Proper Configuration
To mitigate the risks associated with these vulnerabilities, it is crucial to configure the FPGA properly. This includes enabling both encryption and authentication for bitstreams, as relying on just one can leave the system open to attack.
Future Considerations for FPGA Security
As the field of FPGA usage continues to grow, ongoing research into their security will be essential. Continuous improvement of fuzzing techniques, along with better documentation and understanding of FPGA architectures, will play a pivotal role in enhancing their security.
Conclusion
FPGAs are essential components in modern technology, but their security cannot be overlooked. Through effective fuzzing strategies, it is possible to identify vulnerabilities within FPGA configuration engines. Ongoing research and development will be necessary to ensure these devices remain secure in an increasingly digital world.
Title: JustSTART: How to Find an RSA Authentication Bypass on Xilinx UltraScale(+) with Fuzzing
Abstract: Fuzzing is a well-established technique in the software domain to uncover bugs and vulnerabilities. Yet, applications of fuzzing for security vulnerabilities in hardware systems are scarce, as principal reasons are requirements for design information access (HDL source code). Moreover, observation of internal hardware state during runtime is typically an ineffective information source, as its documentation is often not publicly available. In addition, such observation during runtime is also inefficient due to bandwidth-limited analysis interfaces (JTAG, and minimal introspection of internal modules). In this work, we investigate fuzzing for 7-Series and UltraScale(+) FPGA configuration engines, the control plane governing the (secure) bitstream configuration within the FPGA. Our goal is to examine the effectiveness of fuzzing to analyze and document the opaque inner workings of FPGA configuration engines, with a primary emphasis on identifying security vulnerabilities. Using only the publicly available chip and dispersed documentation, we first design and implement ConFuzz, an advanced FPGA configuration engine fuzzing and rapid prototyping framework. Based on our detailed understanding of the bitstream file format, we then systematically define 3 novel key fuzzing strategies for Xilinx configuration engines. Moreover, our strategies are executed through mutational structure-aware fuzzers and incorporate various novel custom-tailored, FPGA-specific optimizations. Our evaluation reveals previously undocumented behavior within the configuration engine, including critical findings such as system crashes leading to unresponsive states of the FPGA. In addition, our investigations not only lead to the rediscovery of the starbleed attack but also uncover JustSTART (CVE-2023-20570), capable of circumventing RSA authentication for Xilinx UltraScale(+). Note that we also discuss countermeasures.
Authors: Maik Ender, Felix Hahn, Marc Fyrbiak, Amir Moradi, Christof Paar
Last Update: 2024-02-15 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.09845
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.09845
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.