Improving Fairness in Image-Text Models
A method to enhance fairness in machine learning models for image-text tasks.
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
In recent years, machine learning models that can understand both images and text have made great progress. These models are used in various tasks, such as recognizing objects in pictures, generating captions, and answering questions based on visual content. However, there are still some challenges that prevent these models from working well for everyone. One major issue is that these models sometimes learn to focus on irrelevant features, which can lead to unfair outcomes for certain groups of people.
This article discusses a method to improve the fairness of these models. We aim to reduce their dependence on Spurious Features, which are characteristics that are not genuinely related to the actual task but can still affect the model's decisions. This approach seeks to boost the model's robustness and ensure it performs well across different groups, even when no specific group information is available.
Background
Many modern image-text models, like CLIP, have shown remarkable abilities due to being trained on extensive datasets that connect images and text. However, this training can also lead to problems. One key issue is that these models may be too focused on spurious features-elements that correlate with the target outputs but are not genuine indicators of what they are meant to classify. For example, when trying to classify waterbirds and landbirds, a model might incorrectly rely on the background of the image instead of the bird itself. Such reliance can lead to poor performance, especially for underrepresented groups in the training data.
The reliance on these spurious features can be particularly problematic in safety-critical applications. It raises concerns about fairness and efficacy, especially when certain groups of images are misclassified more frequently than others.
Key Challenges
There are several challenges that must be addressed to improve the fairness of image-text models:
Computational Efficiency: Fine-tuning pre-trained models often requires significant time and resources. Approaches that involve adjusting large parts of the model can be impractical, especially for those with limited computational power.
Dependence on Spurious Features: These models may not generalize well and perform poorly on minority groups because they learn to focus on irrelevant features rather than the relevant ones.
Annotation Dependence: Many current methods require group information or annotations, which can be difficult to obtain in real-world scenarios. Creating these labels can be a time-consuming task.
Proposed Solution
To tackle these challenges, we propose a method that focuses on calibrating the representations of the model without relying on group annotations. Our approach consists of two main steps: creating a Calibration Set and refining the features of the samples within this set.
Calibration Set Creation
The first step involves generating a calibration set. Instead of using group annotations, we use the pre-trained model to identify misclassified samples. This set will consist of samples that the model initially got wrong. Having these samples will help us better understand which features need adjustment.
Feature Calibration
Once we have the calibration set, we move on to refining the representations of the samples. The goal is to improve the model's focus on the relevant features while minimizing dependence on spurious features.
This calibration process involves aligning the features of the misclassified samples closer to the correct classifications while distancing them from the incorrect classifications. By doing this, we help the model learn the right features more effectively.
Experimental Setup
To assess the effectiveness of our proposed method, we conduct experiments across multiple datasets. These datasets include examples where spurious correlations are present. We will evaluate the model's performance based on its ability to classify images correctly across different groups.
Datasets
Waterbirds Dataset: This dataset contains images of birds placed in spurious backgrounds (water or land). The challenge here lies in distinguishing between waterbirds and landbirds, heavily influenced by the background.
CelebA Dataset: This dataset includes celebrity images and has challenges relating to gender and hair color classifications. Here, gender often serves as a spurious attribute.
CheXpert Dataset: This dataset consists of chest X-ray images. The classification task often faces challenges from the intersection of race and gender, which can lead to misclassification.
MetaShift Dataset: This dataset includes images of cats and dogs, again impacted by background variations, as cats are often seen indoors and dogs outdoors.
Method Evaluation
Our proposed method is evaluated against both traditional supervised approaches and existing semi-supervised methods. We focus on two key performance indicators:
Worst-Group Accuracy: This metric assesses how well the model performs on the least accurately predicted group, providing insight into fairness across different groups.
Average Accuracy: This metric gives an overall sense of the model's performance across all classes.
Comparison with Existing Methods
We compare our method with other known methods, including those that rely on group annotations. Our method aims to show that it can achieve competitive performance while operating without the need for explicit group information.
Results
The experiments show that our proposed method significantly improves both worst-group accuracy and average accuracy compared to traditional methods. Specifically, the model demonstrates better robustness against spurious correlations. The impact of our calibration process is evident in the improved separation of classes, confirming the effectiveness of our approach.
By implementing our proposed method, we observe that the model's performance on minority groups improves, showcasing the potential of this approach in making machine learning models fairer and more effective for all users.
Analysis of Results
Handling of Spurious Features: Our findings suggest a meaningful reduction in the reliance on spurious features, leading to better performance across various groups.
Efficiency of Calibration Method: The lightweight calibration process allows for quicker adaptations, making it more practical for real-world applications.
Visual Evidence: Visual representations of the class separations demonstrate a clear improvement in how the model distinguishes between classes after calibration.
Future Work
While our method shows promising results, there are still avenues for improvement:
Exploration of Additional Datasets: Testing on more diverse datasets can help assess the robustness of our method across various domains.
Parameter Optimization: Further research into the hyperparameters of our approach could yield even better performance.
Long-term Impact: Assessing the long-term performance of our method in dynamic data environments will provide valuable insights into its effectiveness.
Conclusion
In summary, the constant evolution of image-text models comes with both opportunities and challenges. Our proposed method effectively addresses some of the key issues surrounding fairness and performance. By focusing on calibrating representations without the need for group annotations, we enhance the model's ability to focus on relevant features and reduce the influence of spurious correlations. This advancement opens the door for more equitable outcomes from machine learning models, ensuring they serve a broader range of users effectively.
Our findings not only shed light on how to improve group robustness but also pave the way for practical, lightweight solutions that can be implemented in various applications. Continued research and refinement of these methods will be crucial in enhancing the effectiveness and fairness of machine learning models in the future.
Title: Calibrating Multi-modal Representations: A Pursuit of Group Robustness without Annotations
Abstract: Fine-tuning pre-trained vision-language models, like CLIP, has yielded success on diverse downstream tasks. However, several pain points persist for this paradigm: (i) directly tuning entire pre-trained models becomes both time-intensive and computationally costly. Additionally, these tuned models tend to become highly specialized, limiting their practicality for real-world deployment; (ii) recent studies indicate that pre-trained vision-language classifiers may overly depend on spurious features -- patterns that correlate with the target in training data, but are not related to the true labeling function; and (iii) existing studies on mitigating the reliance on spurious features, largely based on the assumption that we can identify such features, does not provide definitive assurance for real-world applications. As a piloting study, this work focuses on exploring mitigating the reliance on spurious features for CLIP without using any group annotation. To this end, we systematically study the existence of spurious correlation on CLIP and CLIP+ERM. We first, following recent work on Deep Feature Reweighting (DFR), verify that last-layer retraining can greatly improve group robustness on pretrained CLIP. In view of them, we advocate a lightweight representation calibration method for fine-tuning CLIP, by first generating a calibration set using the pretrained CLIP, and then calibrating representations of samples within this set through contrastive learning, all without the need for group labels. Extensive experiments and in-depth visualizations on several benchmarks validate the effectiveness of our proposals, largely reducing reliance and significantly boosting the model generalization.
Authors: Chenyu You, Yifei Min, Weicheng Dai, Jasjeet S. Sekhon, Lawrence Staib, James S. Duncan
Last Update: 2024-11-01 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07241
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.07241
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.