New Method for Efficient Text Summarization
A novel approach to enhance summarization skills in smaller models using larger models.
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
In recent years, large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have made significant improvements in tasks such as summarizing text. They can take long articles and turn them into brief summaries that capture essential details. However, these models are very big and require a lot of computing power. This makes them difficult to use in places where resources are limited or where data privacy is a concern. To tackle these issues, researchers have come up with a new method that lets smaller, local models learn to summarize text effectively by using the skills of the larger models without needing to send data to them.
Summarization is Important
WhySummarization is the process of taking a long piece of text and condensing it into a shorter form that still delivers the main points. This becomes important in various settings, such as news articles where readers want to quickly grasp the key facts. In the past, summarization methods often struggled to provide structured summaries that highlighted important themes, relationships between ideas, and detailed explanations. Recent advances suggest that LLMs can help with this process by understanding the structure of topics in a text. However, the idea of using LLMs to help smaller models summarize information has not been extensively explored until now.
Our Approach
The new method breaks down the summarization process into three main steps. This allows smaller models to pick up summarization techniques from larger models and use them independently. Here’s how it works:
Rationales and Summaries
Step 1: ExtractingThe first step involves asking the large model to identify key points and summaries from a text. This process results in a collection of vital ideas and short summaries that are relevant to these ideas.
Step 2: Selecting High-Quality Rationales
Next, the created summaries undergo evaluation to choose the best ones. Two criteria are used: one assesses how well the summary matches the original text, while the other checks if the ideas within the summary are connected and coherent. Once the top summaries are identified, they are used to train the smaller model.
Step 3: Training the Smaller Model
The final step involves training the smaller model using a structured learning approach. Here, the model starts with easier tasks and progressively takes on more complex tasks, allowing it to build summarization skills over time.
Contributions to Summarization
This approach brings several benefits to the field of summarization:
- It creates a new way for small models to gain summarization skills from larger models.
- A scoring method is designed to pinpoint high-quality summaries, which provides a strong foundation for training.
- Experiments demonstrate that using summaries derived from larger models leads to better performance in small models.
- By analyzing the decision-making process of the larger models, the smaller models gain deeper insights into how to summarize content.
Related Work in Summarization
Enhancing Summarization with Large Models
Recent advances in summarization largely come from transformer-based models which have shown improvements in understanding more complex relationships in long texts. Various models have been trained on vast amounts of text data, allowing them to excel in tasks like summary generation. However, the heavy demands of these large models limit their usability, especially in environments where privacy is a concern.
Some researchers have attempted to use LLMs to assist in creating summaries, but these methods often fall short of fully transferring the reasoning and thought processes of the large models to smaller ones.
Knowledge Distillation
Knowledge distillation is a method where knowledge from a larger model (often described as a "teacher") is transferred to a smaller model (the "student"). This helps smaller models perform well even in settings with limited resources. While there have been advancements in using distillation for various tasks, including summarization, there has been less focus on how to apply this to complex summarization methods.
The TriSum Approach
Through our work, we introduce a framework called TriSum, which effectively transfers summarization skills from a large language model to a smaller one. The goal is to build a system that can summarize texts while being lightweight and efficient for resource-constrained settings.
Key Concepts
- Aspects: These are key points that summarize the main topics of a document.
- Triples: A format that breaks down information into three parts: subject, relation, and object. For example, "Cats eat fish" can be broken down into ("Cats", "eat", "fish").
How TriSum Works
TriSum operates through three main steps:
- Aspect-Triple Rationale Generation: The large model generates key points and structured triples from the text.
- Golden Rationale Selection: The best rationales (summaries) are chosen based on their quality.
- Local Model Training: The smaller model is trained using these exciting rationales, starting with simple tasks and moving to more complex ones.
Evaluating Performance
The effectiveness of the TriSum approach is evaluated on three main datasets:
- CNN/DailyMail: Contains news articles with corresponding summaries.
- XSum: A dataset where each article has a single sentence summary, requiring true understanding of the content.
- ClinicalTrial: A collection of clinical trial documents, where the summary must capture key study motivations and outcomes.
Results
In testing, TriSum outperformed many state-of-the-art models across all datasets. The scores indicate a marked improvement in summarization capabilities, showcasing the model's ability to provide coherent and informative summaries.
Importance of Interpretability
Interpretability is essential in understanding how models make decisions. TriSum enhances interpretability by making the summarization process more transparent. Users can see how the final summary relates to the key points and relationships identified, resulting in a clearer understanding of the model's reasoning.
Challenges and Limitations
Even though TriSum shows great promise, there are challenges to be aware of:
- Dependence on LLMs: If the larger model has biases or inaccuracies, these might transfer to the smaller model.
- Scope of Rationales: The rationales may not capture all details, potentially oversimplifying the original text.
- Overfitting: The smaller model might become too reliant on the rationales, limiting its ability to generalize to new data.
- Misinterpretation: Enhanced interpretability can lead to misuse, as users may over-rely on model outputs.
Conclusion
TriSum presents an innovative way of transferring summarization abilities from large language models to smaller, more accessible models. Through its three-step approach, it enables efficient and nuanced summarization even in resource-limited settings. With ongoing advancements, the potential for leveraging large models in practical applications continues to grow, offering better tools for summarizing vast amounts of information.
Title: TriSum: Learning Summarization Ability from Large Language Models with Structured Rationale
Abstract: The advent of large language models (LLMs) has significantly advanced natural language processing tasks like text summarization. However, their large size and computational demands, coupled with privacy concerns in data transmission, limit their use in resource-constrained and privacy-centric settings. To overcome this, we introduce TriSum, a framework for distilling LLMs' text summarization abilities into a compact, local model. Initially, LLMs extract a set of aspect-triple rationales and summaries, which are refined using a dual-scoring method for quality. Next, a smaller local model is trained with these tasks, employing a curriculum learning strategy that evolves from simple to complex tasks. Our method enhances local model performance on various benchmarks (CNN/DailyMail, XSum, and ClinicalTrial), outperforming baselines by 4.5%, 8.5%, and 7.4%, respectively. It also improves interpretability by providing insights into the summarization rationale.
Authors: Pengcheng Jiang, Cao Xiao, Zifeng Wang, Parminder Bhatia, Jimeng Sun, Jiawei Han
Last Update: 2024-03-15 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.10351
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.10351
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.