Improving Text Generation with Clear Citations
New methods enhance text generation by focusing on concise, relevant citations.
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
- The Need for Concise Attributions
- Locally-attributable Text Generation
- Steps in the Process
- Content Selection
- Sentence Planning
- Sentence-by-Sentence Generation
- Benefits of this Approach
- Application in Different Tasks
- Evaluation of Performance
- Results of the Studies
- Challenges Faced
- Future Directions
- Conclusion
- Summary
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Text generation using machines has become more advanced, but one main issue is "hallucination," where the output is not accurate or reliable. In this context, new methods are being created to improve how machines generate text by providing clear references or citations to back up the information they provide. Instead of just pointing to entire sources, which can be overwhelming to check, the goal is to focus on small, specific parts of the texts that directly support the generated content. This can make fact-checking much easier for readers.
The Need for Concise Attributions
Current methods of generating text often provide citations that refer back to whole documents or large sections. While this is better than nothing, it forces users to sift through a lot of unrelated information to verify facts. The new approach aims to make this process simpler and faster by ensuring that citations are precise and relevant to the specific statements made in the output text.
Locally-attributable Text Generation
The strategy called "Attribute First, then Generate" splits the process into three clear steps. First, relevant pieces of the source text are chosen; next, a plan is made for how to form sentences using those pieces; finally, the sentences are generated one after the other. By focusing on specific segments from the sources, this method ensures that citations are integrated neatly into the generated text. This means that each sentence has accurate references right next to it, making it easier for readers to verify claims.
Steps in the Process
Content Selection
In the content selection step, the model identifies specific sentences or segments from the source documents that are relevant to the topic at hand. By narrowing down to only the most important pieces, the subsequent steps can be more focused and effective.
Sentence Planning
Once the relevant content is selected, it is organized into clusters. This helps the model understand which pieces fit together logically in a single sentence. By breaking down the generation task into smaller parts, the model can tackle each sentence separately, leading to clearer and more coherent output.
Sentence-by-Sentence Generation
In the final step, the model generates text one sentence at a time. It uses the organized clusters from the earlier step to ensure that each sentence is well-structured and directly tied to its citations. This method allows for fluid and logical writing while keeping all necessary references close at hand.
Benefits of this Approach
The "Attribute First, then Generate" method has been tested in tasks like summarization and question-answering. It has shown to produce more concise citations compared to previous methods, which can make the process of verifying information much quicker and more efficient for users. This not only improves the quality of the generated text but also simplifies the task of checking its accuracy.
Additionally, having precise citations can enhance the reliability of machine-generated content. This is crucial, especially in academic or professional settings, where accurate information is vital.
Application in Different Tasks
This approach can adapt to a variety of text generation tasks. For summarization, it can highlight key points from multiple documents, while in question-answering, it can narrow down to specific answers that are directly supported by source materials. By making small adjustments to content selection, the model can suit the needs of different contexts without losing the effectiveness of its citation strategy.
Evaluation of Performance
The effectiveness of this new method is assessed through multiple tests and evaluations. These tests measure not only how well the generated text fulfills its intended purpose but also how accurate the citations are. By combining automated measures and human feedback, the quality of both the text and its references can be thoroughly analyzed.
Results of the Studies
In studies comparing the new approach with existing methods, the results show significant benefits. The citations produced are much shorter and more relevant, leading to a decrease in the amount of time required for human reviewers to check facts. The output quality remains high, ensuring that the generated text stays useful while improving its trustworthiness.
Challenges Faced
While this new method presents many advantages, there are challenges to consider. The process can take more time and computing resources than simpler models since it involves multiple steps. Additionally, if one part of the process fails, it can affect the overall output. However, by ensuring robust systems at each step, these challenges can be minimized.
Future Directions
Looking forward, there is potential for this "Attribute First, then Generate" method to be expanded and improved. Researchers can explore different configurations and further enhance the quality of text generation and the accuracy of citations. The aim is to create even more reliable systems that help users easily verify information.
Conclusion
The strategy of focusing on concise citations in text generation represents a significant step toward creating more reliable and user-friendly machine-generated content. By improving how text is produced and ensuring that supporting evidence is clear and easy to find, this method contributes to making the generated information more trustworthy and easier to verify.
As technology continues to develop, such methods are crucial for creating tools that can effectively assist users in various fields. Adapting these techniques to different needs will help push the boundaries of what is possible in text generation while maintaining a strong focus on accuracy and clarity.
Summary
In summary, the "Attribute First, then Generate" approach enhances text generation by providing clear, concise citations that improve fact-checking efficiency. This model separates the generation process into distinct steps, making the output more coherent and trustworthy. As this area continues to evolve, further developments will likely yield even better techniques for ensuring the quality and reliability of machine-generated texts.
The full implementation of this system may take time and require more resources, but the benefits it offers in terms of improving the reliability of generated text make it a promising direction for future research in natural language processing.
Title: Attribute First, then Generate: Locally-attributable Grounded Text Generation
Abstract: Recent efforts to address hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) have focused on attributed text generation, which supplements generated texts with citations of supporting sources for post-generation fact-checking and corrections. Yet, these citations often point to entire documents or paragraphs, burdening users with extensive verification work. In this paper, we introduce a locally-attributable text generation approach, prioritizing concise attributions. Our method, named "Attribute First, then Generate", breaks down the conventional end-to-end generation process into three intuitive steps: content selection, sentence planning, and sequential sentence generation. By initially identifying relevant source segments ("select first") and then conditioning the generation process on them ("then generate"), we ensure these segments also act as the output's fine-grained attributions ("select" becomes "attribute"). Tested on Multi-document Summarization and Long-form Question-answering, our method not only yields more concise citations than the baselines but also maintains - and in some cases enhances - both generation quality and attribution accuracy. Furthermore, it significantly reduces the time required for fact verification by human assessors.
Authors: Aviv Slobodkin, Eran Hirsch, Arie Cattan, Tal Schuster, Ido Dagan
Last Update: 2024-07-04 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17104
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.17104
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://duc.nist.gov/
- https://anonymous.4open.science/r/multi-news-dataset-5B4F
- https://github.com/oriern/SuperPAL
- https://ai.google.dev/models/gemini
- https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2004.05150
- https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2210.11416
- https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/11rBalUhfAltvS-hptGOiVkPf51TsPr_ROoGjxXGzpWQ/edit
- https://worker.mturk.com/
- https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1fF1NZZd4cIp5f9NZCZVxYG3-A4s4SfifsLAPayib0kc/edit
- https://huggingface.co/docs/evaluate/en/index
- https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/internal/generation_utils
- https://www.latex-project.org/help/documentation/encguide.pdf