Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Physics# Chemical Physics# Materials Science

New Approach to Global Optimization in Materials Science

A fresh method for finding optimal atomic structures using complementary energy landscapes.

― 5 min read


Optimizing AtomicOptimizing AtomicStructures Efficientlyatomic arrangements.A new method improves finding optimal
Table of Contents

Global Optimization is an important area in science that focuses on finding the best structure or arrangement of atoms in a system. This is crucial for understanding materials and their properties. To find the most stable arrangement, researchers explore a landscape of potential energy, looking for the lowest energy state or "Global Minimum."

This article explains a new approach to generating candidate structures to help in this search. The idea is based on something called complementary energy landscapes. Instead of trying to model every detail of the energy landscape, this method creates a smoother version that helps scientists identify new pathways to find the best structures.

The Need for New Structures

In the realm of atomistic systems, identifying the global minimum energy structure is key. This could involve various types of structures, including clusters of molecules or solid materials like crystals. There are various methods used to search for these structures; some common ones are random structure search, basin-hopping, simulated annealing, and particle swarm algorithms.

These methods work by generating different candidate structures and evaluating their Energy Levels. The goal is to find the lowest energy configuration. Advanced techniques like density functional theory (DFT) help calculate the energy of these structures precisely. However, searching through complex landscapes can be challenging and time-consuming.

Complementary Energy Landscapes

To speed up the searching process, researchers have introduced the idea of complementary energy (CE) landscapes. These landscapes are not complete replicas of the true potential energy surface. Instead, they are simplified versions that focus on key features, making it easier to identify low-energy structures.

The CE landscapes are created using machine learning techniques. By using data gathered from a variety of atomic environments, scientists develop models that can quickly evaluate energy levels. These models are not overly complicated, which helps in speeding up calculations.

How CE Landscapes Work

CE landscapes are designed to have fewer local minima, or points where the energy is lower than surrounding areas. This reduced complexity allows for more straightforward optimization. When researchers locally optimize structures within the CE landscapes, they can discover important new paths to finding better configurations in the true energy landscape.

The construction of CE landscapes involves three main choices: how to define the local atomic environments, which atoms to use as reference points, and how to convert these environments into energy values. Each of these choices can significantly affect the efficiency of the optimization process.

Structure Generation

In structure generation, researchers start with a known arrangement of atoms and perturb it slightly. By applying the CE method, scientists can explore new configurations without the burden of a highly detailed energy landscape. This exploration can lead to discovering novel arrangements that were previously missed.

The process can be visualized as taking a current structure, creating a CE landscape based on it, and then relaxing this structure within the CE landscape to find new candidates. Following this, other methods, like molecular dynamics, can be used to fine-tune the candidates and check their energies.

Applications in Different Systems

This method has been tested on different systems to evaluate its effectiveness. For instance, researchers evaluated a reduced form of tin oxide on a specific surface. Using the CE method, they were able to identify the global minimum energy structure efficiently.

Another application was on olivine (MgSiO) clusters, which are of interest in astrochemistry. The CE generator helped the researchers find a new candidate structure that had not been reported before. This highlights the potential of complementary energy landscapes in contributing to a deeper understanding of various materials.

Combining Techniques

The CE method can be combined with other optimization algorithms to improve results further. For example, the CE generator can replace standard random generation methods in the searches. This hybrid approach allows the search to benefit from both the exploration capabilities of traditional methods and the efficiency of the CE landscapes.

By comparing different ways to define local environments, as well as the choices for energy calculations, researchers could refine their strategies to yield better results in searching for the best structures.

Evaluating Performance

To measure the success of the approach, researchers utilize success curves. These curves help portray how often the global minimum structure is found after a certain number of evaluations of potential energy. By comparing the success rates with and without the CE generator, it becomes clearer how much this method improves the search for optimal structures.

In various tests, the CE generator consistently led to a higher chance of finding the correct structure when compared to traditional methods. This was evident in both simpler systems and more complex arrangements, showcasing the method's adaptability and robustness.

Conclusion

This article has discussed the concept of complementary energy landscapes and their usefulness in global optimization of atomistic structures. By simplifying the energy landscape and focusing on key features, researchers can generate better candidate structures more efficiently.

The CE method has demonstrated effectiveness in several different atomic systems, revealing new arrangements and improving upon existing techniques. As scientists continue to explore and refine these methods, the potential for significant advancements in materials science and understanding the behavior of complex systems remains promising.

The ongoing support for research in this area is essential, as it can lead to new discoveries that enhance our comprehension of the atomic world and the development of innovative materials.

In summary, the complementary energy landscapes represent a powerful tool that can facilitate the search for optimal atomic structures, ultimately contributing to advancements in material science and related fields.

Original Source

Title: Generating candidates in global optimization algorithms using complementary energy landscapes

Abstract: Global optimization of atomistic structure rely on the generation of new candidate structures in order to drive the exploration of the potential energy surface (PES) in search for the global minimum energy (GM) structure. In this work, we discuss a type of structure generation, which locally optimizes structures in complementary energy (CE) landscapes. These landscapes are formulated temporarily during the searches as machine learned potentials (MLPs) using local atomistic environments sampled from collected data. The CE landscapes are deliberately incomplete MLPs that rather than mimicking every aspect of the true PES are sought to become much smoother, having only few local minima. This means that local optimization in the CE landscapes may facilitate identification of new funnels in the true PES. We discuss how to construct the CE landscapes and we test their influence on global optimization of a reduced rutile SnO2(110)-(4x1) surface, and an olivine (Mg2SiO4)4 cluster for which we report a new global minimum energy structure.

Authors: Andreas Møller Slavensky, Mads-Peter V. Christensen, Bjørk Hammer

Last Update: 2024-02-28 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18338

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.18338

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles