How Animals Coordinate Their Movements
This research explores how spinal circuits regulate animal locomotion.
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
- The Mechanics of Movement
- The Structure of CPGs
- Episodic Rhythmicity Across Spinal Segments
- Distribution and Coupling of Episode-Generating Circuits
- Sensory Influences on Rhythmicity
- Dorsal and Ventral Circuit Contributions
- Recurrent Pathways in Rhythm Generation
- Developmental Aspects of the Study
- Conclusion
- Original Source
Animals move in different ways based on their surroundings. This movement can change in terms of speed and pattern to make it more effective. For instance, animals that migrate long distances tend to keep moving continuously to cover more ground, while those that are exploring might stop frequently to look around. The ability to coordinate these movements is controlled by circuits in the spinal cord known as Central Pattern Generators (CPGs). These circuits help shape and adjust movement patterns based on sensory inputs, allowing for smoother and more effective locomotion.
The Mechanics of Movement
When animals move, their bodies create patterns that are essential for efficient locomotion. These patterns involve not just how fast they move, but how often they stop or pause. Continuous movement, such as during migration, requires a different approach compared to exploratory movements that need frequent stops. CPGs are networks in the spinal cord responsible for generating these movement patterns.
Research has shown that these CPGs are present throughout the lumbar spinal cord and involve various types of nerve cells, particularly glutamatergic interneurons. These interneurons receive sensory information that helps in adjusting and refining movement patterns suitable for the environment. Once these patterns are established, the output from these interneurons is relayed to Motoneurons, which control muscle actions. This communication allows for the modulation of motor output, ensuring that movements are flexible and can be adapted as necessary.
The Structure of CPGs
Despite our understanding of basic locomotor patterns, it remains unclear how the neural circuits that lead to Episodic movements are organized. For example, in fish, movement patterns can be seen as rhythmic actions that arise during early development when certain nerve inputs arrive. These episodic movements are crucial during exploration or foraging activities. Studies have shown that the basic episodic locomotor patterns can be generated in various animals, including fish, amphibians, and rodents. This raises the question of whether the circuits responsible for these episodic movements are localized within the spinal cord or if they share similarities with those that generate continuous locomotion.
To investigate this, researchers utilized the neonatal mouse spinal cord and examined the networks responsible for generating episodic rhythmic patterns triggered by Dopamine. They found that these networks are spread across different spinal segments and have both overlapping and distinct features when compared to other rhythmic patterns produced by the spinal cord.
Episodic Rhythmicity Across Spinal Segments
Research indicates that various Neuromodulators, like dopamine, can induce episodic rhythms in lumbar networks. These episodes typically last between 30-60 seconds and can be recorded from different spinal segments. When dopamine was applied, the episodes of rhythmic activity could be detected not just in the lumbar region but also in thoracic and sacral segments. In most cases, these episodes were synchronous across the different spinal segments. However, in some instances, the episodes were asynchronous, suggesting that there is flexibility in how these segments communicate during episodic activity.
Differences in Episode Amplitude and Frequency
The amplitude of episodes, which measures the strength of the response, was highest in the lumbar segments, while the frequency power of the rhythmic activity was strongest in the L5 segment. Interestingly, the duration of the episodes did not show significant differences across the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral segments, indicating a relatively consistent pacing of episodic activity within different spinal areas.
Distribution and Coupling of Episode-Generating Circuits
Exploring further, researchers aimed to determine if the circuits responsible for generating episodic rhythmic activity were localized within specific regions of the spinal cord. The episodic rhythm produced by dopamine did not rely on inputs from other segments of the spinal cord, as cutting these segments did not affect the rhythm parameters in the lumbar region. Furthermore, even when segments were isolated, episodic activity persisted, showing that certain networks are capable of functioning independently.
In contrast, when segments were isolated, their ability to couple with each other was disrupted, which indicates that a specific tract known as the ventrolateral funiculus is critical for the intercommunication between these segments.
Sensory Influences on Rhythmicity
The role of sensory inputs in regulating these episodic activities cannot be ignored. Sensory afferents are responsible for conveying information about the environment to the spinal circuits, influencing the timing and pattern of movements. Electrical stimulation of the dorsal root in certain segments was able to reset the rhythm of episodic activity. This reset was not limited to a single segment but extended to others, illustrating how sensory inputs can influence and coordinate movement across the spinal cord.
Dorsal and Ventral Circuit Contributions
Further investigations revealed the presence of dopamine receptors in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, implying that these circuits could play a role in generating episodic activity. However, the actual mechanisms underlying the generation of episodic patterns do not seem to depend on the dorsal interneurons. Instead, the evidence suggests that the generation of episodic rhythms is primarily driven by circuits situated in the ventral horn of the spinal cord.
The study also looked at the influence of motoneurons and their connections, which were thought to contribute to episodic activity through excitation and inhibition pathways. However, it was observed that while the motoneurons do play a role in generating fast rhythms during the episodes, they are not responsible for the initiation of the underlying episodic activity.
Recurrent Pathways in Rhythm Generation
Motoneurons can form recurrent pathways that influence network activity. By examining these pathways, researchers sought to understand their role in episodic activity. While some factors, like cholinergic signaling, impacted the fast rhythm during episodes, they did not significantly alter the fundamental parameters of episodic activity itself.
The findings suggest that the episodes are predominantly generated by premotor interneurons, which operate upstream of the motoneurons responsible for the muscular responses during locomotion. This highlights a separation of functions within the spinal cord-where different circuits generate episodic and continuous movements via distinct mechanisms.
Developmental Aspects of the Study
These experiments used the neonatal mouse spinal cord as a model to study the underlying networks involved in rhythmic activities. It is critical to note that developing circuits may have different characteristics compared to those in fully mature animals. However, episodic patterns of locomotion are also present in adult animals, indicating the relevance of these findings across different life stages.
The study underscores the importance of understanding the networks that facilitate these episodic movements and their implications for how animals adapt their locomotor behaviors to various environments.
Conclusion
By dissecting the organization and function of spinal circuits in generating episodic movements, this research offers a clearer picture of how animals coordinate their locomotor patterns. The identification of these mechanisms not only enhances our understanding of basic movement but also points to potential avenues for research on motor control and rehabilitation in cases of injury or disease affecting movement. Future work will undoubtedly expand on these findings, emphasizing the nuances of movement patterns and the dynamic nature of neural circuits in the spinal cord.
Title: Episodic rhythmicity is generated by a distributed neural network in the developing mammalian spinal cord
Abstract: Spinal circuits produce diverse motor outputs that coordinate the rhythm and pattern of locomotor movements. Despite the episodic nature of these behaviours, the neural mechanisms encoding these episodes are not well understood. This study investigated mechanisms producing episodic rhythms evoked by dopamine in isolated neonatal mouse spinal cords. Dopamine-induced rhythms were primarily synchronous and propagated rostro-caudally across spinal segments, with occasional asynchronous episodes. Electrical stimulation of the L5 dorsal root could entrain episodes across segments, indicating afferent control of the rhythm generator and a distributed rostro-caudal network. Episodic activity was observed in isolated thoracic or sacral segments after full spinal transection or bilateral ventrolateral funiculus (VLF) lesions, suggesting a distributed network coupled via VLF projections. Rhythmicity was recorded from axons projecting through the VLF and dorsal roots, but not from cholinergic recurrent excitation via motoneurons or isolated dorsal inhibitory circuits. The data suggest episodic rhythmicity is generated by a flexibly coupled network of spinal interneurons distributed throughout the spinal cord.
Authors: Patrick J. Whelan, J. J. Milla-Cruz, A. P. Lognon, M. A. Tran, S. A. Di Vito, C. Loer, A. Shonak, M. J. Broadhead, G. B. Miles, S. A. Sharples
Last Update: 2024-07-26 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.26.605187
Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.26.605187.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.