Rethinking Pain Assessment in Athletes
Examining qualitative research to improve athlete pain assessment methods.
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
- Importance of Qualitative Research
- Current Pain Assessment Methods
- Focus Groups
- Nominal Group Technique
- Results and Discussion
- Better Strategies for Describing Pain
- Timing and Communication
- Role of Technology
- Providing Direction and Setting Expectations
- Broadening the Assessment Toolkit
- The Role of Physiotherapists
- Practical Priorities for Pain Assessment
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Athletes often face pain, but understanding their pain can be challenging. Using a mix of research methods, professionals seek to improve how they assess and manage pain in athletes. This paper discusses how Qualitative Research has looked into the experiences of athletes and physiotherapists to find better ways to assess pain.
Importance of Qualitative Research
Qualitative research helps capture the personal experiences of athletes with pain. Athletes described their pain not just in terms of how much it hurts but also included their feelings and the context of their pain. Listening to athletes' stories offers valuable insights that traditional pain measurement tools may overlook.
Current Pain Assessment Methods
Often, pain is assessed using common tools, such as numerical scales that ask athletes to rate their pain from 0 to 10. However, these tools may not fully capture an athlete's experience. For example, athletes may communicate their pain better using descriptive words or sharing specific contexts related to their pain. This understanding pushes for a need to explore better ways to assess and understand pain.
Focus Groups
To gather more information, focus groups were conducted with athletes and physiotherapists from various sports backgrounds. They discussed their experiences and shared what they believe should be prioritized in pain assessment. A guide helped keep discussions on track, ensuring everyone had a chance to voice their thoughts. The analysis of these discussions led to themes that highlighted areas for improvement.
Nominal Group Technique
The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was used to rank the importance of ideas generated during focus groups. Each participant listed their top priorities, and the ideas were then voted on. This process allowed everyone to have equal input and helped identify the most important aspects of pain assessment.
Results and Discussion
From the focus groups, two main themes emerged regarding pain assessment priorities.
1. Enhanced Communication and Pain Descriptions
This theme emphasizes the need for better ways to describe pain. Participants indicated that current methods often fail to capture the full experience. They suggested developing tools that allow for more detailed pain descriptions, including context, timing, and frequency of pain experiences. Technology could also play a role in improving communication related to pain.
2. Integrating Sport-specific and Multidimensional Assessments
The second theme focuses on using a broad range of tools for pain assessment. Athletes expressed the importance of evaluating pain through multiple lenses, considering not just the physical aspect but also the psychological and social context. Sport-specific assessments help provide a clearer picture of how pain impacts an athlete's performance and daily life.
Better Strategies for Describing Pain
Athletes highlighted the difficulty in adequately expressing their pain. They emphasized the need for more comprehensive descriptions that go beyond traditional scales. For instance, using adjectives or specific categories could help convey the intensity and impact of pain better.
For example, athletes might explain how pain affects their sleep, performance, or daily activities. Therapists should embrace this detailed input from athletes to enhance pain assessment practices.
Timing and Communication
Improving the timing and setting of pain assessments was also suggested. Athletes noted that having time to reflect on their pain before seeing a therapist could lead to a more thorough discussion. Regular communication, including updates outside assessment sessions, allows athletes to express their pain experiences better.
Syncing assessments with actual training or competition could provide more accurate evaluations of pain. This approach helps therapists understand when pain occurs and how it impacts athletes in real-time.
Role of Technology
Technological solutions like mobile apps could help track pain and wellness regularly. Athletes are often receptive to using technology to communicate their health status. These applications can offer insights into their experiences and improve the collaboration between athletes and therapists.
However, any technology used must benefit the athlete and not complicate their interactions with their physiotherapist. Clear guidelines on how to use these tools are necessary for effective implementation.
Providing Direction and Setting Expectations
An effective pain assessment should set clear expectations for managing pain. Athletes found that receiving straightforward information about their prospects can motivate them to work towards recovery. Physiotherapists play a key role in providing this information, helping athletes understand their conditions and guiding their rehabilitation process.
However, both athletes and therapists noted the challenges in making definite diagnoses, especially with ongoing pain. Recognizing these difficulties may help build trust between athletes and therapists, as they navigate the complexities of pain together.
Broadening the Assessment Toolkit
Athletes emphasized the need for a wider range of assessment tools that consider psychosocial and environmental factors. Tools that account for an athlete's lifestyle, training load, and other stressors could improve pain assessments. These tools should aim to give a more holistic view of an athlete's experience.
Incorporating assessments conducted in the athlete's sporting environment could also enhance the understanding of pain. Being on the field or in a training setting allows for better insights into how pain affects performance.
The Role of Physiotherapists
Physiotherapists are crucial in the pain assessment process. They need to utilize a variety of tools and techniques to achieve a detailed understanding of an athlete's pain. This involves assessing physical aspects, but also considering the psychological and social factors influencing pain levels.
Training physiotherapists to recognize the specific demands of various sports is essential. Their expertise should enhance rather than replace the athlete's voice in the assessment process.
Practical Priorities for Pain Assessment
The findings from the focus groups lead to several practical priorities for pain assessment.
Incorporating Descriptive Tools: Assessment tools must allow athletes to describe their pain in ways that resonate with their experiences.
Contextual Understanding: Physiotherapists should consider an athlete's lifestyle, training, and environmental factors when assessing pain.
Multidimensional Approaches: Pain assessments must integrate various aspects of an athlete's experience, including psychological and social elements.
Effective Technology Use: Thoughtfully integrating technology can enhance the athlete-physiotherapist relationship.
Conclusion
Effective assessment of athlete pain requires a fresh look at traditional methods. By combining qualitative insights from athletes with new tools and technologies, physiotherapists can develop a more comprehensive understanding of pain. This shift emphasizes the importance of communication, context, and an athlete-centered approach to pain assessment.
As the field of sports medicine evolves, it is crucial to remain open to new ideas and practices that improve how we understand and address athlete pain. The goal is to create an environment where athletes feel heard and supported in their journey through pain management.
Title: Exploring athlete pain assessment experiences and priorities; A two-part qualitative series of athlete and physiotherapist interactions. Part Two. Forging Our Future - Athlete and physiotherapist priorities for pain assessment and beyond.
Abstract: ObjectivesTo explore the future priorities of athlete upper and lower limb pain assessment by facilitating shared understandings of athletes and sports physiotherapists. DesignQualitative Research using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach. MethodsWe carried out focus groups comprising a deliberate criterion sample using a constructivist perspective. At the end of each focus group. we used the nominal group technique method to generate a list of consensus-based priorities for future pain assessment. Our paper follows the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines. ResultsWe completed five focus groups, comprising twelve athletes (female, n=5, male n=7) and four sports physiotherapists (male, n=4) Two final themes (and five subthemes) were developed; I Enhanced Communication and Pain Descriptions (describing and representing pain, better communication, the role of technology), II Integrating Sport Specific and Multidimensional Assessments (broadening the pain assessment toolkit, the role of technology). We developed a set of thirteen practical priorities for future pain assessment that span the subjective, objective, and general aspects of the athlete pain assessment. ConclusionWe have presented stakeholder-generated perspectives and priorities for athlete pain assessment. Athletes and Physiotherapists must continue to work together to achieve a comprehensive sport-specific multidimensional pain assessment experience alongside their wider support networks to ensure optimal representation and communication. We have highlighted some available pain assessment tools and strategies and outlined how novel tools may help adress certain elements. Researchers, clinicians and athletes can consider the practical guidance we have provided to address these future priorities.
Authors: Ciaran Purcell, C. Barry Walsh, G. Van Oirschot, B. M. Fullen, T. Ward, B. M. Caulfield
Last Update: 2024-04-02 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.20.24301522
Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.20.24301522.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.