Optimizing Memory Management for Language Models
A new technique for dynamic memory allocation improves efficiency in large language models.
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
Big language models (LLMs) are now used in many areas, including chatbots, search engines, and coding helpers. To get the best performance from these models, we need to optimize how they use memory, especially when running on GPUs. This article discusses a new way to manage memory for LLMs that avoids some common problems. The focus is on improving efficiency and reducing the complexity that comes with managing memory dynamically.
Memory Management in LLMs
When LLMs run, they need to keep track of a lot of information in memory. This includes storing the state of the model as it processes input text and generates output tokens. The process consists of two main parts: Prefill, where the model prepares data, and Decode, where the model generates responses. The decode phase is especially important as it determines how quickly the model can reply to requests.
Prefill and Decode Phases
In the prefill phase, the model processes all input tokens in parallel. This means it can handle many requests at once, making it efficient. The decode phase, on the other hand, works one token at a time. This part can be slow because it depends on the memory available. The model needs to access the stored information to generate the next token, and if there isn’t enough memory, performance suffers.
Importance of Memory Allocation
When an LLM receives a request, it needs to allocate memory to store the tokens and their corresponding states. Historically, some systems would reserve a large amount of memory upfront for each request, based on the maximum expected number of tokens. This can lead to wasted memory because if a request generates fewer tokens than expected, the extra memory sits unused. This issue, known as internal fragmentation, makes the system less efficient.
Dynamic Memory Allocation
To solve these problems, we can use a technique called dynamic memory allocation. Instead of reserving all the memory at the beginning, this approach allocates memory as needed. When a request comes in, the system only allocates memory for what is currently required and keeps track of this usage over time.
Key Benefits
- Efficient Use of Memory: By allocating memory on-the-fly, we minimize waste and ensure that memory is used effectively.
- Higher Throughput: With better memory management, the model can handle larger batches of requests simultaneously, leading to faster processing times.
- Simplicity: This method avoids the need for complex memory management systems that can slow down the process, making it easier for developers to implement improvements without a lot of additional work.
Comparison to Traditional Methods
Past systems like Orca and FasterTransformer would allocate a fixed amount of memory for each request, which leads to a high level of wasted capacity. In contrast, the newer systems allow for more efficient memory use by dynamically managing how memory is allocated and de-allocated.
Memory Fragmentation Issues
When models allocate memory in a non-contiguous way, there can be complications. This means that memory is not stored in a single block, making it more challenging for the system to efficiently use it. The changes needed in the model’s code can add a lot of complexity, leading to potential performance issues.
How Dynamic Memory Management Works
In our new approach, we keep the same memory layout while allowing for dynamic allocation. This means we can take advantage of existing memory management tools without needing extensive changes to the model’s code or the serving framework. Here’s how it works:
Virtual Memory Reservations
The system reserves a large contiguous block of virtual memory for incoming requests. This means that, although the memory may not be physically allocated right away, there’s a designated space where it can be stored. When the model needs to allocate memory, it can quickly do so from this reserved space, allowing for rapid processing.
On-Demand Allocation
As new tokens are generated or as requests grow, the system can allocate physical memory only when it's truly needed. This allows the model to serve requests without pre-allocating too much memory, thus reducing the chances of fragmentation and waste.
Leveraging Existing Tools
This approach utilizes low-level system support for managing memory, similar to how operating systems handle virtual memory. By repurposing these existing tools, we simplify the overall architecture, allowing the model developers to focus on optimizing performance rather than on intricate memory management techniques.
Performance Improvements
Experiments have shown that adopting this new dynamic memory management strategy significantly improves performance. By allowing the system to efficiently allocate memory, we can achieve faster response times and higher throughput.
Testing with LLMs
To test the new methods, various models were run using this dynamic memory allocation system. The results showed that models could process requests much faster than before, especially under heavy loads with many simultaneous requests.
Overcoming Latency Challenges
Latency, which can slow down processing, is reduced through careful memory allocation strategies. By overlapping memory allocation with computation, the model can prepare memory while performing other tasks, which keeps the process flowing smoothly and efficiently.
Conclusion
Dynamic memory management for large language models is a crucial step for improving their efficiency and responsiveness. By using a system that allows for flexible memory allocation, we can reduce waste and handle more requests simultaneously. This not only speeds up processing but also simplifies the work for developers, enabling them to implement improvements without a major overhaul of the system.
In the future, as LLMs continue to evolve and become more complex, approaches like dynamic memory allocation will be essential for maintaining performance without compromising on quality or usability. This innovative strategy marks a significant advancement in the field, ensuring that big language models can serve users effectively and efficiently.
Title: vAttention: Dynamic Memory Management for Serving LLMs without PagedAttention
Abstract: Efficient management of GPU memory is essential for high throughput LLM inference. Prior systems used to reserve KV-cache memory ahead-of-time that resulted in wasted capacity due to internal fragmentation. Inspired by demand paging, vLLM proposed PagedAttention to enable dynamic memory allocation for KV-cache. This approach eliminates fragmentation and improves serving throughout. However, to be able to allocate physical memory dynamically, PagedAttention changes the layout of KV-cache from contiguous virtual memory to non-contiguous virtual memory. As a consequence, one needs to rewrite the attention kernels to support paging, and implement a memory manager in the serving framework. This results in both performance and programming overheads, as well as portability challenges in adopting state-of-the-art attention kernels. In this paper, we propose vAttention, a new approach for dynamic KV-cache memory management. In contrast to PagedAttention, vAttention stores KV-cache in contiguous virtual memory and leverages OS support for on-demand allocation of physical memory. vAttention thus enables one to use state-of-the art attention kernels out-of-the-box by adding support for dynamic allocation of physical memory without having to re-write their code. We implement vAttention in the vLLM serving stack to show that it also helps improve decode throughput by up to 1.99x over vLLM, and the end-to-end serving throughput by up to 1.22x and 1.29x, compared to using the state-of-the-art PagedAttention based kernels of FlashAttention and FlashInfer.
Authors: Ramya Prabhu, Ajay Nayak, Jayashree Mohan, Ramachandran Ramjee, Ashish Panwar
Last Update: 2024-07-12 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04437
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.04437
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.