Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Physics# Instrumentation and Detectors# High Energy Physics - Experiment# Accelerator Physics

Gas Density and Background Noise in LHC Experiments

Research reveals links between gas density and background noise in ATLAS.

― 5 min read


Background Noise in LHCBackground Noise in LHCStudiesexperimental signals.Examining the impact of gas density on
Table of Contents

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is a massive particle accelerator that helps scientists study tiny particles, like protons. One part of this research happens in the ATLAS experiment, where scientists look for signs of new physics. However, during these experiments, Background Noise can confuse results. This noise mainly comes from collisions between protons and residual gas in the beam pipe.

In order to keep track of this background noise and improve the quality of experiments, a series of tests were conducted at the LHC. These tests aimed to understand how different conditions affect the background signals measured by ATLAS.

Background Noise at the LHC

When protons travel through the LHC, they collide with each other and sometimes with gas molecules left over inside the beam pipe. These collisions can create background signals that complicate scientists’ ability to observe the specific physics events they are interested in.

To monitor this background, ATLAS uses several tools. The Beam Conditions Monitor (BCM) measures the conditions around the beam pipe, while fake jets are observed further away. The combination of these two methods provides a complete picture of the background noise.

Purpose of the Tests

The main goal of the tests was to investigate how background signals change when Gas Density in the beam vacuum is altered. By injecting gas into the vacuum, the tests simulated various conditions to see how they influenced background signals at different distances from the interaction point, where protons collide inside ATLAS.

Conducting Pressure Bump Tests

During the tests, researchers introduced local Pressure Bumps by heating non-evaporable getter (NEG) cartridges, which released gas into the beam pipe. This process temporarily increased the density of gas in specific locations. The tests were conducted at varying distances from the interaction point, providing valuable data about the relationship between gas density and background signals.

Observations and Measurements

As the pressure bumps were introduced, researchers closely monitored changes in background signals at ATLAS. They discovered that variations in the local pressure correlated well with changes in the background signals detected by the BCM.

For example, in some regions, the increase in background signals was significant, while in others, the increase was barely noticeable. This kind of data is crucial for improving the accuracy of experiments conducted at the LHC.

Importance of Background Monitoring

Monitoring background signals is vital for scientists working at the LHC. By understanding how different factors contribute to background noise, researchers can refine their analysis techniques. An efficient monitoring system allows them to filter out irrelevant data and focus on the interesting physics events.

The Role of the BCM

The BCM is a key instrument in monitoring background levels. It detects early hits caused by particles colliding nearby and helps to identify when background noise originates from collisions with gas in the beam pipe. Researchers utilized the BCM results to link background levels with changes in gas density during the tests.

Understanding Fake Jets

Fake jets, on the other hand, are events that can mimic real physics signals but are actually caused by high-energy particles. These particles lose energy as they travel through the detector, leading to misinterpretation of the data. The tests showed how background signals related to fake jets changed at different distances from the interaction point.

Analyzing Different Locations

Tests were conducted at four separate locations, measuring the changes in background signals based on the introduced gas density. Results showed that the BCM was particularly sensitive to background noise close to the interaction point, while instances of fake jets were more likely to occur further away.

Results and Findings

Based on the tests, researchers found that:

  1. The correlation between local pressure changes and background signals was strong.
  2. The BCM was more effective at detecting background caused by nearby beam-gas collisions compared to fake jets.
  3. Background levels changed significantly depending on the distance from the interaction point.

Summary of Key Results:

  • Near the interaction point, the BCM detected more background from beam-gas events.
  • At further distances, the rates of fake jets increased.
  • The background observed by the BCM was significantly higher at local pressure bumps.

Importance of Gas Density Variation

The results highlight the need for continuous monitoring and the importance of understanding variation in gas density within the LHC. By carefully observing these changes, researchers can gain valuable insights into the complexities of particle collisions.

Future Directions

These findings lay the groundwork for improving monitoring systems at the LHC. The data collected can help refine simulations that predict background levels, ultimately enhancing the quality of physics measurements.

Efforts will be made to minimize the impact of background noise in future experiments. This includes developing better techniques for distinguishing genuine physics results from those affected by noise.

Conclusion

By investigating how gas density affects background signals at the LHC, researchers gained important insights into the behavior of the ATLAS experiment. The established correlation between pressure bumps and changes in background noise will facilitate more accurate measurements of particle collisions.

Future studies should continue exploring methods to mitigate background noise, ensuring the LHC remains a leading facility for cutting-edge particle physics research.

Original Source

Title: Beam-induced backgrounds measured in the ATLAS detector during local gas injection into the LHC beam vacuum

Abstract: Inelastic beam-gas collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), within a few hundred metres of the ATLAS experiment, are known to give the dominant contribution to beam backgrounds. These are monitored by ATLAS with a dedicated Beam Conditions Monitor (BCM) and with the rate of fake jets in the calorimeters. These two methods are complementary since the BCM probes backgrounds just around the beam pipe while fake jets are observed at radii of up to several metres. In order to quantify the correlation between the residual gas density in the LHC beam vacuum and the experimental backgrounds recorded by ATLAS, several dedicated tests were performed during LHC Run 2. Local pressure bumps, with a gas density several orders of magnitude higher than during normal operation, were introduced at different locations. The changes of beam-related backgrounds, seen in ATLAS, are correlated with the local pressure variation. In addition the rates of beam-gas events are estimated from the pressure measurements and pressure bump profiles obtained from calculations. Using these rates, the efficiency of the ATLAS beam background monitors to detect beam-gas events is derived as a function of distance from the interaction point. These efficiencies and characteristic distributions of fake jets from the beam backgrounds are found to be in good agreement with results of beam-gas simulations performed with the FLUKA Monte Carlo programme.

Authors: ATLAS Collaboration

Last Update: 2024-08-20 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05054

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.05054

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from author

Similar Articles