Using AI to Aid Comedians in Humor Writing
This article explores the role of AI in comedy creation and the challenges faced by comedians.
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
This article looks at how Language Models, which are artificial intelligence systems, could be used to help comedians write jokes and create funny material. We studied how these tools align with the way professional comedians think and work in their craft.
Background
Humor is complex and relies on various cultural and personal factors. To understand how well language models can assist in comedy, we interviewed 20 comedians who use AI in their creative process. The study was part of workshops held at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe and online.
Workshop Structure
The workshop lasted three hours and included a comedy writing session using language models, a questionnaire to measure how well AI supports Creativity, and group discussions on the comedians' experiences and concerns. Participants shared their thoughts on the effects of AI on their work, particularly regarding Bias, censorship, and copyright issues.
Findings from the Workshop
Comedians' Views on AI in Comedy
Many comedians expressed concerns that language models often promote mainstream ideas while ignoring minority perspectives. They pointed out that the moderation strategies used to filter content reinforced existing biases. Most felt that the AI-generated comedic material lacked originality and often resembled outdated comedy styles.
The Role of Humor in Society
Comedy serves as a way to challenge social norms, resist oppression, and engage in satire. The comedians highlighted the importance of context in understanding humor. They warned that the lack of context could lead to harmful interpretations, especially regarding offensive language.
Limitations of Language Models
Participants noted that while language models could be helpful for generating ideas and structures for jokes, they often fell short in producing genuinely humorous content. Many comedians felt that they had to do the heavy lifting in adding humor to the material created with AI.
The Challenges of Humor Generation
Creating humor poses unique challenges for machines.
The Complexity of Humor
Humor often relies on surprise, timing, and personal experience. Language models typically lack the ability to bring personal background or situational context into their outputs, which are crucial for effective comedy.
Issues with AI Outputs
Comedians reported that AI-generated jokes were often bland or not funny. They described the outputs as generic and lacking the necessary punch that comes from personal insight and individual expression.
The Importance of Human Touch
Participants emphasized that human input is essential for adding humor to AI-generated content. Many felt that while AI could support the writing process, it could not replace the unique perspective that human comedians bring to the art form.
Context Matters
Comedy requires an understanding of audience dynamics and cultural context. The comedians pointed out that jokes often need to be tailored to fit specific situations and audiences, something language models struggle to do effectively.
Ethical Considerations
The comedians raised several ethical questions about using AI in their work.
Concerns About Ownership
There were fears that using AI could blur the lines of authorship. Many comedians expressed doubts about taking credit for AI-assisted material and how ownership would be viewed in the broader industry.
Issues of Censorship
Participants discussed how moderation tools used in AI can limit the range of topics and types of humor they could explore. They felt that these restrictions could detract from their creative freedom and the overall quality of their work.
Representation and Bias
Comedians shared concerns that language models reflect dominant cultural viewpoints. They argued that this leads to the erasure of diverse voices in comedy, making it harder for underrepresented comedians to get their perspectives across.
Exploring Use Cases for AI in Comedy Writing
Despite the limitations, language models can be useful in several ways.
Creative Collaborators
Many comedians saw potential in using AI as a brainstorming partner. They described scenarios where AI could quickly generate ideas or help structure a joke, providing a starting point for their creative process.
Generating Content
Some comedians reported success in using language models to create first drafts or outlines for their material. They noted that AI could save time when producing content, even if significant human edits were still necessary.
Assessing the Quality of AI-Generated Comedy
To better understand how well language models support comedy writing, we needed to evaluate their outputs.
Interviews and Surveys
Comedians filled out surveys about their experiences working with AI tools. They rated their enjoyment, the uniqueness of the material, and how well they felt they were able to express their creativity.
Mixed Reactions
While some participants enjoyed the process of writing with AI, many were not satisfied with the quality of the jokes produced. Most felt that the AI did not contribute meaningfully to the humor, leaving them responsible for the funny elements.
Future Directions for AI in Comedy
The findings from the workshops and interviews suggest several paths for improving how language models can be used in the comedy writing process.
Community-Based Approaches
Comedians proposed that language models should be aligned more closely with the values and backgrounds of specific communities. By gathering input from diverse groups, AI could better reflect a range of comedic styles and cultural perspectives.
Reducing Moderation
Although some moderation is necessary to prevent harmful content, comedians argued for a more nuanced approach. They suggested that allowing comedians greater control over moderation could enhance the creative process.
Training on Diverse Data
Training language models using a wider variety of comedic voices could help improve their outputs. Comedians indicated a need for AI that understands the subtleties and intricacies of different humor styles based on cultural context.
Conclusion
The study reveals that while language models hold promise as tools for assisting with comedy writing, they currently face significant challenges. Comedians have unique insights and experiences that are essential for crafting humor, which AI cannot replicate. Moving forward, it is crucial to address ethical concerns and develop AI systems that support and empower comedians without undermining their creative agency. By fostering community-driven approaches and ensuring diverse representation, we can work toward building better AI tools suited for the art of comedy.
Title: A Robot Walks into a Bar: Can Language Models Serve as Creativity Support Tools for Comedy? An Evaluation of LLMs' Humour Alignment with Comedians
Abstract: We interviewed twenty professional comedians who perform live shows in front of audiences and who use artificial intelligence in their artistic process as part of 3-hour workshops on ``AI x Comedy'' conducted at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe in August 2023 and online. The workshop consisted of a comedy writing session with large language models (LLMs), a human-computer interaction questionnaire to assess the Creativity Support Index of AI as a writing tool, and a focus group interrogating the comedians' motivations for and processes of using AI, as well as their ethical concerns about bias, censorship and copyright. Participants noted that existing moderation strategies used in safety filtering and instruction-tuned LLMs reinforced hegemonic viewpoints by erasing minority groups and their perspectives, and qualified this as a form of censorship. At the same time, most participants felt the LLMs did not succeed as a creativity support tool, by producing bland and biased comedy tropes, akin to ``cruise ship comedy material from the 1950s, but a bit less racist''. Our work extends scholarship about the subtle difference between, one the one hand, harmful speech, and on the other hand, ``offensive'' language as a practice of resistance, satire and ``punching up''. We also interrogate the global value alignment behind such language models, and discuss the importance of community-based value alignment and data ownership to build AI tools that better suit artists' needs.
Authors: Piotr Wojciech Mirowski, Juliette Love, Kory W. Mathewson, Shakir Mohamed
Last Update: 2024-06-03 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20956
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.20956
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2016/feb/28/beyond-the-fence-review-computer-created-musical-arts-theatre-london
- https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2021/aug/24/rise-of-the-robo-drama-young-vic-creates-new-play-using-artificial-intelligence
- https://12thnight.ca/2022/08/13/oh-no-bots-have-invaded-theatre-and-they-can-do-it-plays-by-bots-a-fringe-review/
- https://humanmachine.live
- https://improbotics.org
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edinburgh_Festival_Fringe
- https://edfringe.com
- https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/jul/30/a-bot-walks-into-a-bar-edinburgh-fringe-performers-use-ai-to-write-jokes
- https://huggingface.co/models
- https://www.vox.com/culture/2023/9/24/23888673/wga-strike-end-sag-aftra-contract
- https://dl.acm.org/ccs.cfm
- https://cworld.ai
- https://prolific.com