Advances in Multi-modal Large Language Models for Visual Question Answering
This paper explores how MLLMs store and transfer information in answering visual questions.
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
- Background
- Information Storage and Transfer
- Methodology
- Findings on Information Storage
- Findings on Information Transfer
- Dataset: VQA-Constraints
- Model Editing Techniques
- Experiments and Results
- Fixing Incorrect Answers
- Inserting New Knowledge
- Implications and Future Directions
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
In recent years, models that can handle both images and text, known as Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs), have gained attention. These models try to answer questions about images, linking visual data with language. This paper focuses on how information is stored and transferred within MLLMs, especially in tasks like Visual Question Answering (VQA).
Background
Large Language Models (LLMs) are designed to understand and generate text based on a set of learned data. However, when these models are expanded to handle both images and text, they introduce additional complexities. The way information from pictures and words integrates affects their performance in various tasks.
Understanding these integrations is vital for improving these systems and ensuring they provide correct and reliable information. This article specifically looks at how MLLMs handle factual questions related to images.
Information Storage and Transfer
In MLLMs, there are two main processes: information storage and Information Transfer.
Information Storage refers to how facts are kept in a model's memory. When a model is trained, it learns facts from a large dataset and stores this information in its parameters.
Information Transfer is about how the model retrieves this stored information when processing a question. It looks at how facts from the inputs are used to generate the correct output.
Methodology
To study how MLLMs handle information, a particular approach is used. The researchers put visual questions into the model to see how it retrieves and processes information. The framework involves asking questions that can have both visual and textual constraints. For instance, a question might refer to both an image and a specific piece of information in that image.
By observing how models respond, valuable insights can be gained about their information storage and transfer mechanisms.
Findings on Information Storage
The research revealed that MLLMs retrieve information from earlier layers compared to LLMs. This means they rely more on initial processing stages for storing facts relevant to the questions asked. The early layers of the model are crucial for linking visual aspects of the query with the correct answers.
In particular, the first layers, called MLP (Multi-Layer Perceptron) and self-attention layers, were identified as key components that help with information retrieval. These layers interact with visual tokens, which are representations of the image data, to transfer relevant information effectively.
Findings on Information Transfer
Regarding how well the models transfer information, the research identified specific trends in their operations. MLLMs might retrieve facts from images, but the self-attention layers play a major role in passing this information along to the final answer. These middle layers are crucial for connecting the information stored in earlier layers with the generated output.
In this way, when a question is posed, the model does not just pull the answer from the stored memory but interacts through various layers to ensure the context is applied correctly.
Dataset: VQA-Constraints
To carry out this research, a new dataset called VQA-Constraints was created. This dataset includes a set of images paired with factual questions. Each question is annotated with constraints, helping to guide the model in its information retrieval process.
The dataset is divided into two types of questions based on the constraints they present:
- Single Constraint Questions, which focus on one element, usually visual.
- Multi-Constraint Questions, which require the model to integrate multiple pieces of information, both visual and textual.
This structured approach gives the researchers a clear way to evaluate how well the MLLMs handle different types of questions.
Model Editing Techniques
The research also introduced methods for editing MLLMs, aiming to improve their responses by correcting wrong answers and adding new information. The editing process involves adjusting the model’s parameters to enhance its performance on specific types of questions.
A significant part of the study was devoted to showing how targeted edits can lead to substantial improvements. For example, when a model gets a specific question wrong, fine-tuning the parameters associated with the early layers helps correct its output.
Experiments and Results
Several experiments were carried out to evaluate the methods introduced. The models were tested on sets of questions specifically designed to challenge their information retrieval capabilities.
Fixing Incorrect Answers
In one experiment, the model's ability to answer common visual questions was tested. The researchers found that by applying their editing methods, they could significantly improve the answers generated by the model. Incorrect answers saw a marked increase in the probability of being correct, demonstrating the effectiveness of the editing process.
The results showed that after editing the model, it could generate the right answers much more reliably. This not only helped with commonly asked questions but also enhanced the model's understanding of the context for more complex queries.
Inserting New Knowledge
In another experiment, the focus shifted to inserting long-tailed knowledge. This involved testing the model with questions about less common facts, which it usually struggled to answer correctly. Similar to the previous tests, the editing methods resulting in the model being better able to draw from its learned knowledge base.
The enhancements made it apparent that targeted editing could effectively bring new factual information into the model and improve its overall performance on various query types.
Implications and Future Directions
The findings from this research have significant implications for the development and application of MLLMs. By understanding how these models store and transfer information, developers can build more effective systems that cater to a wider range of tasks.
Moreover, future research can delve deeper into improving the design of these models, potentially leading to better accuracy and higher reliability. There is also a need for methods to ensure that these models do not spread misinformation, especially when they are capable of editing their knowledge base.
Conclusion
This work provides insights into the workings of MLLMs, especially how they handle information storage and transfer in visual question answering tasks. The introduction of a new dataset and editing methods allows for a more thorough understanding of these models and opens up pathways for further exploration and improvement.
As MLLMs continue to evolve, understanding their mechanisms will be crucial for maximizing their potential and ensuring they serve users effectively and accurately.
Title: Understanding Information Storage and Transfer in Multi-modal Large Language Models
Abstract: Understanding the mechanisms of information storage and transfer in Transformer-based models is important for driving model understanding progress. Recent work has studied these mechanisms for Large Language Models (LLMs), revealing insights on how information is stored in a model's parameters and how information flows to and from these parameters in response to specific prompts. However, these studies have not yet been extended to Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Given their expanding capabilities and real-world use, we start by studying one aspect of these models -- how MLLMs process information in a factual visual question answering task. We use a constraint-based formulation which views a visual question as having a set of visual or textual constraints that the model's generated answer must satisfy to be correct (e.g. What movie directed by the director in this photo has won a Golden Globe?). Under this setting, we contribute i) a method that extends causal information tracing from pure language to the multi-modal setting, and ii) VQA-Constraints, a test-bed of 9.7K visual questions annotated with constraints. We use these tools to study two open-source MLLMs, LLaVa and multi-modal Phi-2. Our key findings show that these MLLMs rely on MLP and self-attention blocks in much earlier layers for information storage, compared to LLMs whose mid-layer MLPs are more important. We also show that a consistent small subset of visual tokens output by the vision encoder are responsible for transferring information from the image to these causal blocks. We validate these mechanisms by introducing MultEdit, a model-editing algorithm that can correct errors and insert new long-tailed information into MLLMs by targeting these causal blocks.
Authors: Samyadeep Basu, Martin Grayson, Cecily Morrison, Besmira Nushi, Soheil Feizi, Daniela Massiceti
Last Update: 2024-06-06 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04236
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.04236
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.