Advancements in Cancer Gene Testing
Gene testing improves cancer treatment by targeting specific genetic changes.
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
- What is Cancer Gene Testing?
- The Role of Technology in Gene Testing
- The Impact of Genetic Changes on Cancer Treatment
- Differences in Treatment Response
- Analyzing Patient Data
- Understanding the Significance of Actionable Alterations
- Challenges in Detecting Genetic Changes
- The Need for Further Research
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
The ability to analyze genes in cancer can greatly improve how we treat patients. By looking closely at the specific changes in genes that may lead to cancer, doctors can make better choices for treatment. This process is known as comprehensive genome sequencing (CGS). It helps doctors find important genetic changes that can be targeted for effective therapy.
What is Cancer Gene Testing?
Cancer gene testing involves looking at the DNA in tumor cells to find Mutations or changes that may drive cancer. Some of these changes can be targeted with specific drugs, making treatment more effective. The goal is to tailor therapy based on the unique genetic makeup of each patient’s cancer.
There are various types of genetic changes that can cause cancer, including mutations, Amplifications, and Fusions. Mutations are changes in the DNA sequence, amplifications occur when there are too many copies of a certain gene, and fusions happen when two different genes combine to form a new gene. One well-known example of genetic change in cancer is the Philadelphia chromosome in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), which is created by a specific gene fusion that leads to cancer.
The Role of Technology in Gene Testing
Recent advancements in technology, such as the FoundationOne® diagnostic tests, have helped make CGS more accessible for patients. These tests analyze tissue or blood samples to detect mutations and other genetic changes across many types of solid tumors. In Japan, these tests are covered by public health insurance, but only after standard treatments have been completed.
The Impact of Genetic Changes on Cancer Treatment
Certain genetic changes are known to drive cancer and play a significant role in how patients respond to treatments. For example, some patients may have mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), while others may have fusions involving genes like anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) or ROS1. The presence of these driver alterations can lead to better outcomes with targeted therapies.
Targeted therapies are designed to specifically attack cancer cells with certain genetic changes while sparing normal cells. This is a shift from traditional treatments, which may affect both cancerous and healthy cells alike.
Differences in Treatment Response
Although targeted therapies can be effective, not all patients respond the same way. Treatment response can vary based on the type of genetic changes present in the tumors. For instance, patients with specific mutations might experience prolonged benefits from drugs like gefitinib and osimertinib, which target EGFR mutations. On the other hand, patients with fusions involving ALK or ROS1 often see a different response.
In many cases, cancers with kinase fusions have fewer actionable genetic alterations than those with mutations. This means that while the presence of a kinase fusion may strongly drive cancer development, there are often fewer options for targeted therapy.
Analyzing Patient Data
In a recent study, doctors analyzed data from over 600 patients with different types of solid cancers. They found that 9.6% of these patients had fusions involving genes that could impact their treatment. Among the patients analyzed, those with kinase fusions had significantly fewer actionable alterations compared to those with other types of genetic changes.
When researchers looked into the detailed genetic profiles of the patients, they discovered a range of changes among different groups. Patients with kinase mutations had a higher average number of actionable alterations compared to those with kinase fusions. This suggests that kinase fusions may limit treatment options.
Understanding the Significance of Actionable Alterations
Actionable alterations are specific genetic changes that can be targeted with available treatments. The study showed that patients with kinase fusions had a median of just two actionable alterations, while those with mutations had a median of five or more. This reinforces the idea that kinase fusions may be a dominant force in driving cancer but offer fewer avenues for targeted therapy.
The presence of mutations in other important genes, such as TP53, was also noted. These mutations can impact how patients respond to treatment, and their presence might complicate the effectiveness of targeted therapies.
Challenges in Detecting Genetic Changes
Despite the advancements in technology, detecting genetic changes can still be challenging. Some methods, especially those that rely on DNA analysis alone, may miss important gene fusions. For example, RNA-based tests can be more effective in identifying fusions than DNA tests.
This means that doctors need to use a combination of testing methods to get a complete picture of the genetic landscape in a patient’s tumor. This is crucial for developing effective treatment plans.
The Need for Further Research
The findings from studies of this nature can help shape future cancer treatments. However, the study had limitations, such as a small sample size of patients with kinase fusions. More extensive research with larger groups of patients is necessary to gain a better understanding of the impact of different genetic changes on treatment outcomes.
Researchers have begun to highlight the need for studies that specifically focus on different cancer types and the role of genetic alterations. Such studies will help identify which patients are likely to benefit from targeted therapies and how those therapies can be best utilized.
Conclusion
Gene testing plays a vital role in cancer treatment by allowing doctors to tailor therapies based on the specific genetics of a patient’s tumor. Understanding the significance of various genetic changes, including mutations, amplifications, and fusions, is essential for developing effective treatment plans.
As technology continues to improve, and more research is conducted, the hope is that personalized medicine will lead to better outcomes for cancer patients. By focusing on the genetic alterations that drive cancer, we can develop targeted therapies that offer the best chance for successful treatment.
Title: Comparison of actionable alterations in cancers with kinase fusion, mutation, and amplification
Abstract: Kinase-related gene fusion and point mutations play pivotal roles as drivers in cancer, necessitating optimized targeted therapy against these alterations. The efficacy of molecularly targeted therapeutics varies depending on the specific alteration, with great success reported for such therapeutics in the treatment of cancer with kinase fusion proteins. However, the involvement of actionable alterations in solid tumors, especially in relation to kinase fusions, remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to compare the number of actionable alterations in patients with tyrosine or serine/threonine kinase domain fusions, mutations, and amplifications. We analyzed 613 patients with 40 solid cancer types who visited our division between June 2020 and April 2024. To detect alterations involving multiple-fusion calling, we performed comprehensive genomic sequencing using FoundationOne(R) companion diagnostic (F1CDx) and FoundationOne(R) Liquid companion diagnostic (F1LCDx). Patient characteristics and genomic profiles were analyzed to assess the frequency and distribution of actionable alterations across different cancer types. Of the 613 patients, 44 had fusions involving kinases, transcriptional regulators, or tumor suppressors. F1CDx and F1LCDx detected 13 with kinase-domain fusions. We identified 117 patients with kinase-domain mutations and 58 with kinase-domain amplifications. The number of actionable alterations in patients with kinase-domain fusion, mutation, or amplification (median [interquartile range; IQR]) was 2 (1-3), 5 (3-7), and 6 (4-8), respectively. Patients with kinase fusion had significantly fewer actionable alterations than those with kinase-domain mutations and amplifications. However, those cancers with fusion involving tumor suppressors tended to have more actionable alterations (median [IQR]; 4 [2-9]). Cancers with kinase fusions tended to exhibit fewer actionable alterations than those with kinase mutations and amplifications. These findings underscore the importance of detecting kinase alterations and indicate the pivotal role of kinase fusions are strong drivers of cancer development, highlighting their potential as prime targets for molecular therapeutics.
Authors: Shinsuke Suzuki, T. Akahane, A. Tanimoto, M. Higashi, I. Kitazono, M. Kirishima, M. Nishigaki, T. Ikeda, S. Kanemitsu, J. Nakazawa, E. Akahane, H. Nishihara, K. Uozumi, M. Yoshimitsu, K. Ishitsuka, S.-i. Ueno
Last Update: 2024-05-25 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.24.24307868
Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.24.24307868.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.