Insights into Jellyfish Galaxies in Clusters
Study reveals characteristics and star formation rates of jellyfish galaxies.
― 4 min read
Table of Contents
In space, there are various types of galaxies. Among them, Jellyfish Galaxies are unique because they have long, tentacle-like features. This paper looks at 51 jellyfish galaxy candidates found in three clusters: Fornax, Antlia, and Hydra. We use images taken with a specific survey system called S-PLUS, which captures a wide range of colors and features of galaxies.
These jellyfish galaxies were identified using a classification system that sorts galaxies based on how they look in the images. We also used a new method involving self-supervised learning, a type of machine learning that helps analyze and categorize these galaxies without needing extensive human labeling.
Methods
Identifying Jellyfish Galaxies
To find jellyfish galaxies, we used optical images that capture different colors of light. These images help us see the structural features of the galaxies. We looked at how these galaxies were visually classified using a scheme called JClass. In this scheme, JClass 0 means "not a jellyfish," while higher numbers indicate stronger jellyfish characteristics.
To classify these galaxies, we also developed a semi-automated approach that combines visual inspection with machine learning techniques. This method helps reduce potential human error in the identification process.
Analyzing the Data
We gathered data from the S-PLUS survey that includes images of the galaxies. The images help to estimate the Star Formation Rates and morphological features of the galaxies. We calculated specific measurements, such as the Gini coefficient and Entropy, to understand better how the light in these galaxies is distributed.
Results
Classification Findings
From our analysis, we identified different jellyfish candidates across the three galaxy clusters. About 30% of the galaxies showed some jellyfish characteristics. This distribution is similar to what previous studies have found, although the exact ratios may vary.
Our method revealed that jellyfish candidates exhibit lower Gini Coefficients and higher entropy than non-jellyfish ones. This suggests that the jellyfish galaxies have more irregular light distributions and are more clumpy in appearance.
Star Formation Rates
By measuring the light emitted by hydrogen in the galaxies, we estimated the star formation rates (SFRs). We discovered that jellyfish candidates showed heightened star formation compared to non-jellyfish galaxies. This increase in SFR is likely due to a process called ram-pressure stripping, where gas is stripped away from the galaxy as it moves through the dense environment of the cluster.
Motion Direction of Galaxies
We observed the directions in which jellyfish galaxies were moving within their clusters. Most of the jellyfish galaxies in the Fornax and Antlia clusters appeared to be moving toward the centers of those clusters. In contrast, the motion of galaxies in the Hydra cluster was less certain, indicating a mix of movements.
Discussion
Importance of the Study
This research highlights how jellyfish galaxies interact with their environments, which can alter their structures and star formation activities. The findings suggest that jellyfish galaxies could provide key insights into how galaxies evolve in dense environments.
Machine Learning Advantage
Our implementation of self-supervised learning showed promise in assisting the visual classification of galaxies. This method offers a scalable way to handle large datasets and helps in refining the classification of jellyfish galaxies based on their observed properties.
Future Directions
Further studies could expand the dataset and explore additional techniques to improve the accuracy of jellyfish galaxy classifications. By combining higher quality datasets with advanced machine learning methods, researchers could refine our understanding of jellyfish galaxies and their place in the universe.
Conclusion
The study of jellyfish galaxies reveals valuable information about galaxy evolution and interactions in dense environments. Using advanced imaging techniques and machine learning methods, we’ve learned more about the properties and behaviors of these unique galaxies. Continued research in this area promises to deepen our understanding of the cosmos.
Title: Systematic analysis of jellyfish galaxy candidates in Fornax, Antlia, and Hydra from the S-PLUS survey: A self-supervised visual identification aid
Abstract: We study 51 jellyfish galaxy candidates in the Fornax, Antlia, and Hydra clusters. These candidates are identified using the JClass scheme based on the visual classification of wide-field, twelve-band optical images obtained from the Southern Photometric Local Universe Survey. A comprehensive astrophysical analysis of the jellyfish (JClass > 0), non-jellyfish (JClass = 0), and independently organized control samples is undertaken. We develop a semi-automated pipeline using self-supervised learning and similarity search to detect jellyfish galaxies. The proposed framework is designed to assist visual classifiers by providing more reliable JClasses for galaxies. We find that jellyfish candidates exhibit a lower Gini coefficient, higher entropy, and a lower 2D S\'ersic index as the jellyfish features in these galaxies become more pronounced. Jellyfish candidates show elevated star formation rates (including contributions from the main body and tails) by $\sim$1.75 dex, suggesting a significant increase in the SFR caused by the ram-pressure stripping phenomenon. Galaxies in the Antlia and Fornax clusters preferentially fall towards the cluster's centre, whereas only a mild preference is observed for Hydra galaxies. Our self-supervised pipeline, applied in visually challenging cases, offers two main advantages: it reduces human visual biases and scales effectively for large datasets. This versatile framework promises substantial enhancements in morphology studies for future galaxy image surveys.
Authors: Yash Gondhalekar, Ana L. Chies-Santos, Rafael S. de Souza, Carolina Queiroz, Amanda R. Lopes, Fabricio Ferrari, Gabriel M. Azevedo, Hellen Monteiro-Pereira, Roderik Overzier, Analía V. Smith Castelli, Yara L. Jaffé, Rodrigo F. Haack, P. T. Rahna, Shiyin Shen, Zihao Mu, Ciria Lima-Dias, Carlos E. Barbosa, Gustavo B. Oliveira Schwarz, Rogério Riffel, Yolanda Jimenez-Teja, Marco Grossi, Claudia L. Mendes de Oliveira, William Schoenell, Thiago Ribeiro, Antonio Kanaan
Last Update: 2024-06-06 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04213
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.04213
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://splus.cloud
- https://www.zooniverse.org/
- https://github.com/amanda-lopes/Halpha-SPLUS-Jelly
- https://splus.cloud/
- https://github.com/Yash-10/jellyfish_self_supervised
- https://uvadlc-notebooks.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorial_notebooks/tutorial17/SimCLR.html
- https://jacobgil.github.io/pytorch-gradcam-book/Pixel