Analyzing Reflection Complexity in Sequences
A study of how reflection complexity reveals pattern behaviors in sequences.
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
In the study of patterns in sequences made of a set of symbols, researchers look at various ways to understand how complex these sequences are. One measure of complexity is called reflection complexity. This measures how many unique subsets of the sequence exist, with the added twist that two subsets are considered the same if one can be turned into the other by flipping it backward. This concept builds on other well-known ideas in sequence analysis, helping to provide a fuller picture of how sequences behave and change.
Basic Concepts
A sequence is just a list of symbols, and the symbols come from a finite set called an alphabet. For instance, in a binary sequence, the alphabet includes just two symbols: 0 and 1. In the study of sequences, we are often interested in smaller parts of the sequence, known as Factors. A factor is any continuous piece of the sequence. For example, in the sequence "01001", the factors include "0", "1", "01", "00", and so on.
Now, reflection complexity takes this a step further. It counts factors but considers two factors as the same if one can be obtained by reversing the other. For example, "01" and "10" would be counted as the same if we are only looking at their reflections.
Growth Properties
Researchers study how the reflection complexity behaves as the sequence gets longer. Two important ideas are growth and relationships with other types of complexities. Growth describes how the number of unique factors changes as the length of the sequence increases. For instance, a sequence might show a steady increase in reflection complexity, while another could grow rapidly or even stall at a certain point.
Special Types of Sequences
Several kinds of sequences have special properties that make them interesting to study with reflection complexity. Among these are Automatic Sequences, Sturmian Sequences, and others like episturmian and Rote Sequences.
Automatic Sequences: These are sequences that can be generated by an algorithm. They follow a set pattern, making them easier to analyze. The reflection complexity of these automatic sequences can often be computed easily using software tools.
Sturmian Sequences: These sequences are known for having minimal complexity among non-repeating sequences. They can be defined in a way that connects them closely with reflection complexity. Properties of these sequences allow us to understand their growth and complexity well, especially through reflection.
Episturmian Sequences: These are similar to Sturmian sequences but have unique properties that involve their use of special factors. They are characterized by their reversal closure, meaning reversing any part of the sequence still results in a valid factor of the sequence.
Rote Sequences: These sequences contain special symmetry, which can lead to unique reflection complexity characteristics. They allow for interesting comparisons with other sequence types.
Investigating Complexity
When examining reflection complexity, researchers apply different mathematical tools and software. These tools can compute the complexity for different sequences, giving a practical means to test ideas and find patterns in the data. This allows for a deeper inspection of how various sequences stack up against one another and where their properties diverge.
Patterns in Reflection Complexity
Patterns emerge when looking at the reflection complexities of various sequences. Some sequences grow more complicated quickly, while others grow slowly or plateau. These trends can reveal relationships between different sequences and their underlying structures. By studying these relationships, researchers can uncover deeper insights into the nature of sequences and inform further studies.
Characterizing Sequences
Characterization involves defining specific features that distinguish various sequence types based on their properties. Through this study, researchers can identify conditions that determine whether a sequence behaves like a Sturmian sequence, an automatic sequence, or others. These characterizations allow for more precise predictions about how different sequences will behave as they grow longer.
Growth Comparisons
Comparing how different types of sequences grow in their reflection complexities can yield fascinating insights. For instance, researchers can determine whether certain properties, like being automatic, correlate with a more substantial growth in reflection complexity. This aspect of research helps establish a clearer understanding of how sequence types relate to one another.
Open Questions
Despite the significant advances made in understanding reflection complexity, many questions remain unanswered. Researchers are eager to explore more about how sequences can be classified based on their growth properties, particularly in understanding those that do not fit neatly into existing categories. Open questions lead to new explorations and encourage further investigation into the nature of sequences and their complexities.
Applications
The concepts of reflection complexity and the analysis of sequences have broad applications in computer science, cryptography, and even biology. For example, the ways sequences can be generated and analyzed can play a critical role in creating secure communication methods or understanding patterns in genetic data. By studying these complexities, researchers and practitioners can harness this knowledge for practical solutions to real-world problems.
Conclusion
Reflection complexity offers a unique lens through which we can examine and understand sequences formed from finite alphabets. Through examining growth properties, studying special sequence types, and comparing their complexities, we gain valuable insights into the nature of sequences. While researchers continue to push the boundaries of this field, many questions remain, driving ongoing exploration into the complexities of sequences and how they shape our understanding of patterns in data.
Title: The reflection complexity of sequences over finite alphabets
Abstract: In combinatorics on words, the well-studied factor complexity function $\rho_{\bf x}$ of a sequence ${\bf x}$ over a finite alphabet counts, for any nonnegative integer $n$, the number of distinct length-$n$ factors of $\mathbf{x}$. In this paper, we introduce the reflection complexity function $r_{\bf x}$ to enumerate the factors occurring in a sequence ${\bf x}$, up to reversing the order of symbols in a word. We introduce and prove general results on $r_{\bf x}$ regarding its growth properties and relationship with other complexity functions. We prove a Morse-Hedlund-type result characterizing eventually periodic sequences in terms of their reflection complexity, and we deduce a characterization of Sturmian sequences. Furthermore, we investigate the reflection complexity of quasi-Sturmian, episturmian, $(s+1)$-dimensional billiard, and complementation-symmetric Rote, and rich sequences. Furthermore, we prove that if ${\bf x}$ is $k$-automatic, then $r_{\bf x}$ is computably $k$-regular, and we use the software $\mathtt{Walnut}$ to evaluate the reflection complexity of automatic sequences, such as the Thue-Morse sequence. We note that there are still many unanswered questions about this measure.
Authors: Jean-Paul Allouche, John M. Campbell, Shuo Li, Jeffrey Shallit, Manon Stipulanti
Last Update: 2024-07-19 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09302
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.09302
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.