Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Health Sciences# Genetic and Genomic Medicine

Blood Biomarkers and Disease: New Insights

Study links blood molecules to health issues, revealing potential connections in bipolar disorder.

― 5 min read


Blood Tests RevealBlood Tests RevealDisease Connectionsbiomarkers and health conditions.New study uncovers links between blood
Table of Contents

Recent studies have found that changes in molecules in our blood can lead to complex diseases. These molecules can include proteins, fats, and other tiny substances that give clues about how our organs are working, how our immune system is responding, and how our body is processing energy. Although there is a lot of evidence showing that certain biomolecules are linked to various health problems, it is still unclear how these links work, especially for complex diseases that lack reliable markers to guide diagnosis and treatment.

For example, many studies have shown a higher rate of Glucose problems in people with Bipolar Disorder, but a direct link between the two has not been firmly established. Most of the time, studies show correlations without clarifying whether one actually causes the other. This gap in knowledge is important since understanding causal relationships could help us better identify the right interventions for preventing or treating diseases.

Mendelian Randomization as a Tool

Mendelian Randomization (MR) is a method that can help fill this gap. It uses genetic data as substitutes for biomarker levels, allowing researchers to look at causal effects while controlling for various confusing factors. This method is particularly useful for studying lipids, such as LDL Cholesterol and HDL cholesterol, which have been directly linked to heart and breast diseases respectively. Other studies have also suggested connections between substances like homocysteine and strokes, and between amino acids like tyrosine and Type 2 Diabetes.

Despite the insights gained from MR, many biomolecules still need further investigation, and earlier studies often focused on specific markers or diseases. The recent availability of large-scale genomic studies allows for more comprehensive analyses. One of these key resources is the UK Biobank, which has released data on various blood Biomarkers, enabling researchers to assess a wide range of biomolecules and their potential link to numerous diseases.

Overview of the Analysis

In our study, we carefully examined the relationships between 212 different blood biomarkers and 99 diseases using MR techniques. We employed five different analysis methods to ensure the reliability of our results: inverse variance weighted, MR Egger, simple mode, weighted median, and weighted mode. Our focus was on findings that were significant and consistent across multiple methods.

Through this comprehensive analysis, we discovered 21 significant associations between blood biomarkers and disease outcomes. We displayed these findings visually, highlighting the most noteworthy relationships. The size of the arrows in our diagrams indicated the strength of these relationships, with upward arrows representing positive connections (i.e., higher biomarker levels linked to greater disease risk) and downward arrows showing negative relationships.

To bolster our findings, we checked for alignment with previously established connections using multiple MR methods, confirming known relationships like those between lipoprotein A and heart disease and urate and gout. We found no contradictory evidence, providing further confidence in our results.

Key Findings

Among our findings, we established a concrete relationship between total cholesterol and coronary heart disease, a link already supported by past meta-analyses. We also found connections between total cholesterol and heart attacks, alongside links between apolipoprotein B levels and heart attacks. Additionally, we identified a relationship between serum creatinine levels and chronic kidney disease, with creatinine being a well-known marker used to assess kidney function.

Interestingly, we discovered a strong link between high glucose levels and bipolar disorder, as well as an inverse association between Cystatin C levels and bipolar disorder. High glucose is known to be problematic for people with bipolar disorder, as many of these individuals also experience insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes. While previous studies had indicated a connection between glucose issues and bipolar disorder, the specific link we found with cystatin C had not been reported before.

Implications of High Glucose and Cystatin C in Bipolar Disorder

The connection between glucose and bipolar disorder supports existing research showing that many individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder also struggle with blood sugar issues. Additionally, how lithium-a common treatment for bipolar disorder-affects kidney function could provide further insight into these relationships.

The association with cystatin C adds a new layer of understanding since elevated levels were not previously linked to bipolar disorder, according to available literature. Cystatin C levels are often used to evaluate kidney function, and the discovery of a relationship between this marker and bipolar disorder could indicate that kidney health may play a role in the disorder.

Observations across Other Results

While our primary focus was on those associations established in four or more methods, we identified other interesting links that were consistent across two to three methods. For instance, a connection between C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and Alzheimer’s disease was noted, echoing findings from other studies.

Limitations and Future Directions

A limitation of our research is the reliance on data from the UK Biobank. This large-scale data source mainly consists of individuals of European descent, which may limit the generalizability of our findings to more diverse populations. However, as more diverse biobanks grow, they will help address this issue.

Mendelian Randomization studies face their own challenges, such as potential confounding factors and the complexity of estimating relationships involving binary outcomes. Despite these challenges, our study successfully reaffirmed existing knowledge regarding several diseases while also unveiling new potential links between blood markers and bipolar disorder.

Conclusion

Our work highlights the important roles that blood biomarkers may play in helping us understand disease mechanisms. The findings provide a basis for further research that may ultimately lead to improved diagnostic tools and targeted treatments for complex diseases. Going forward, it would be beneficial to look into lifestyle changes or clinical interventions that could help regulate blood glucose levels and maintain kidney function, especially in individuals at risk for bipolar disorder.

Original Source

Title: Associations of Circulating Biomarkers with Disease Risks: a Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

Abstract: BackgroundCirculating biomarkers play a pivotal role in personalized medicine, offering potential for disease screening, prevention, and treatment. Despite established associations between numerous biomarkers and diseases, elucidating their causal relationships is challenging. Mendelian Randomization (MR) can address this issue by employing genetic instruments to discern causal links. Additionally, using multiple MR methods with overlapping results enhances the reliability of discovered relationships. MethodsHere we report an MR study using multiple methods, including inverse variance weighted, simple mode, weighted mode, weighted median, and MR Egger. We use the MR-base resource (v0.5.6)1 to evaluate causal relationships between 212 circulating biomarkers (curated from UK Biobank analyses by Neale lab and from Shin et al. 2014, Roederer et al. 2015, and Kettunen et al. 2016)2-4 and 99 complex diseases (curated from several consortia by MRC IEU and Biobank Japan). ResultsWe report novel causal relationships found by 4 or more MR methods between glucose and bipolar disorder (Mean Effect Size estimate across methods: 0.39) and between cystatin C and bipolar disorder (Mean Effect Size: -0.31). Based on agreement in 4 or more methods, we also identify previously known links between urate with gout and creatine with chronic kidney disease, as well as biomarkers that may be causal of cardiovascular conditions: apolipoprotein B, cholesterol, LDL, lipoprotein A, and triglycerides in coronary heart disease, as well as lipoprotein A, LDL, cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B in myocardial infarction. ConclusionsThis Mendelian Randomization study not only corroborates known causal relationships between circulating biomarkers and diseases but also uncovers two novel biomarkers associated with bipolar disorder that warrant further investigation. Our findings provide insight into understanding how biological processes reflecting circulating biomarkers and their associated effects may contribute to disease etiology, which can eventually help improve precision diagnostics and intervention.

Authors: Kuan-lin Huang, A. Elmas, K. Spehar, R. Do, J. Castellano

Last Update: 2024-07-01 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.06.30.24309729

Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.06.30.24309729.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles