Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology# Bioengineering

Residual Stresses in Arteries: Implications for Health

Research reveals how internal stresses in arteries affect health and risk assessments.

― 7 min read


Arterial Stress EffectsArterial Stress Effectsarterial mechanics.Study reveals critical insights into
Table of Contents

Research has shown that arteries, the blood vessels that carry blood from the heart, have hidden internal pressures known as Residual Stresses (RSs). These stresses are present whether the arteries are still inside the body or after they have been removed. When studies cut into the walls of these arteries, the changes seen in their shape can indicate the presence of these stresses. While the absolute values of RSs might be lower than the stresses arteries face during normal function, they play a crucial role in how stress is distributed throughout the artery wall.

Many computer models that simulate how arteries behave during different conditions, especially when they are in unhealthy states, have found that including these RSs can improve the accuracy of predicting problems like tissue rupture. For instance, certain models have done a better job at predicting risks of rupture in conditions like abdominal aortic aneurysms. This same approach could help assess the risks for blockages in arteries that could lead to serious issues, like heart attacks.

Despite the importance of RSs, many studies that look at how arteries respond to pressure ignore these stresses, especially in arteries affected by atherosclerosis, which is the thickening of artery walls due to plaque build-up. Some models have attempted to account for RSs, but there is still a lack of experimental data to support these models.

A major difficulty in studying arteries is their complex structure. Arteries are made up of several layers, and most research looks at the artery as a whole, rather than examining each layer separately. This can lead to an incomplete understanding of how each layer behaves under pressure. Some studies have started to look more closely at the layers of arteries and have found that when RSs are included in computer models, it leads to a more consistent distribution of stress across the wall.

Research has shown that in the inner layers of arteries, the RSs tend to produce different opening angles when sections are cut. For instance, studies have found that the inner layers tend to open more than outer layers when cut. Researchers have used different methods to measure these stresses and found significant changes in the structure of the arteries after they have been cut and allowed to relax.

The investigation into these stresses is essential for developing accurate simulations of arteries with blockages. Understanding how these stresses work can provide insights that help predict the risks associated with different conditions.

Materials and Methods

For this study, a total of 17 common carotid arteries were collected during autopsies at a medical university. The donors were a mix of males and females with an average age of around 81 years. After harvesting, the samples were frozen in a saline solution until they could be tested, as testing immediately post-extraction was not feasible.

The first step in studying these arteries involved carefully removing the outer tissue layer. Due to size limitations, only circumferential rings could be cut from the arteries for testing, which leads to different experimental procedures being used. Two different methods were then applied to investigate the RSs in the arteries.

In the first method, researchers cut the artery into small rings and allowed them to sit in a saline solution for a while before making a cut that would release the RSs. After a set period, observations were made to assess how the inner and outer layers responded.

In the second method, researchers first separated the inner and outer layers before cutting them into strips. This allowed for a clearer view of how each layer acted independently when subjected to the same conditions. Both methods aimed to gauge how RSs impacted each layer's behavior.

Sample Preparation

After careful removal of connective tissue, the artery segments were cut and fixed onto a plastic cylinder for testing. Because of the narrow size of the samples, only circumferential rings could be studied, which led to some variations in how the experiments were structured.

In the first experimental protocol, the samples were cut, equilibrated in saline, and then glued to a cylinder before being cut again to release RSs. Observations of the opened segments were made after specific time intervals to capture the changes occurring within the arteries.

In the second procedure, the layers were separated before cutting. This allowed for a direct analysis of how each layer behaved independently. Afterward, images were captured at several points to track the changes over time.

Image Processing

Images collected during testing were analyzed to measure geometric parameters like Thickness, Curvature, and opening angles of the layers. The aim was to quantify how these parameters changed throughout the experiments.

Local curvature was especially important in assessing residual stresses, as it offers a more detailed view of how each layer responds under different conditions. The shapes of the arteries were carefully traced and mathematical models were used to calculate their responses.

Statistical Analysis

To ensure that the results were statistically significant, various statistical tests were conducted to compare the different parameters of the artery layers from both experimental protocols. These analyses aimed to reveal trends and differences between the methods used, as well as how the thickness and curvature of the layers influenced each other.

Despite the challenges in achieving perfect layer separation, some trends were evident. For instance, deviations in thickness and curvature indicated that some layers still retained portions of adjacent tissues. This presented a challenge in understanding how accurately the RSs were measured and modeled.

Results

Throughout the testing, several key observations were made. The opening angles of different layers showed significant variations. The inner layers usually displayed positive angles, indicating an expansion, while the outer layers often showed negative angles, suggesting a closing or contraction.

Statistical analyses confirmed that, despite the differences in experimental protocols, there were no significant changes in the final measurements for the layers after release of the RSs. This suggests that the choice of experimental approach did not greatly affect the outcomes, thus providing credibility to the findings.

The findings also indicated that the adventitia layer behaves differently compared to the media layer, often showing a tendency to close rather than open. This called into question some existing models that assume a uniform behavior across all layers of the artery.

Discussion

The study suggests that understanding the behavior of arterial layers under different conditions can significantly impact how RSs are modeled. The unique responses of each layer highlight the importance of conducting separate analyses rather than treating the artery as a whole.

Findings showed that the mechanical behavior of arteries is influenced by the varying properties of their layers. The adventitia, being thinner and more compliant, reacts differently to the release of RSs compared to the media. This difference may have implications for how the stresses are distributed across the arterial wall, particularly in unhealthy arteries.

Overall, the research underlines the complexity of arterial mechanics and the necessity for further exploration in this area. Accurate modeling of RSs and their effects on artery behavior can lead to improved predictions of risks associated with arterial health, thereby enhancing patient care in the future.

Conclusion

Investigating RSs in arteries reveals critical insights into how these blood vessels behave under various conditions. By focusing on the individual layers of arteries rather than the whole structure, researchers can gain a better understanding of the underlying mechanics. This knowledge is vital for predicting risks associated with conditions like atherosclerosis and can help improve the efficacy of patient-specific treatments.

Continued research in this field is essential to deepen our understanding of arterial mechanics and improve clinical outcomes for patients facing cardiovascular challenges.

Original Source

Title: Stress-free state in human carotid arteries cannot be revealed without layer separation

Abstract: Residual stresses are considered as a significant factor influencing the stress-states in arteries. These stresses are typically observed through opening angle of a radially cut artery segment, often regarded as a primary descriptor of their stress-free state. However, the experimental evidence regarding the stress-free states of different artery layers is scarce. In this study, two experimental protocols, each employing different layer-separating sequences, were performed on 17 human common carotid arteries; the differences between both protocols were found statistically insignificant. While the media exhibited opening behaviour (reduced curvature), a contrasting trend was observed for the adventitia curvature, indicating its closing behaviour. In addition to the different bending effect, length changes of both layers after separation were observed, namely shortening of the adventitia and elongation of the media. The results point out that not all the residual stresses are released after a radial cut but a significant portion of them is released only after the layer separation. Considering the different mechanical properties of layers, this may significantly change the stress distribution in arterial wall and should be considered in its biomechanical models.

Authors: Anna Hrubanova, O. Lisicky, O. Sochor, Z. Bednarik, M. Joukal, J. Bursa

Last Update: 2024-10-17 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.15.618414

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.15.618414.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles