New Tool REPORTH Sheds Light on DNA Sequences
REPORTH provides new ways to analyze repetitive DNA sequences in bacteria.
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
- Types of Repetitive Sequences
- The Importance of Studying REPINs
- Insertion Sequences: A Different Approach
- Challenges in Gene Relationships
- Introducing REPORTH: A New Tool
- How REPORTH Works
- The Proof of Principle with Pseudomonas chlororaphis
- Understanding Flanking Sequences
- Rare Instances of Incorrect Clustering
- Future Directions for REPORTH
- Conclusion: The Value of REPORTH
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Repetitive sequences are parts of DNA that repeat themselves and are commonly found in the genetic makeup of many living things. In organisms with complex cells, such as plants and animals, a significant portion of their DNA is made up of these repetitive sequences. This is mainly due to the activity of elements that can move around within the genome. In simpler organisms like bacteria, repetitive sequences are less common but still present in various forms.
Types of Repetitive Sequences
There are two main categories of repetitive sequences. The first type is mutualistic, which means they benefit both the sequence and the organism. Examples include certain DNA repeats that are important for carrying out essential functions. The second type is selfish genetic elements, which act in their own interest, like Insertion Sequences that can insert themselves into new positions in the DNA.
REPINs, a type of short repetitive sequence found in bacteria, are known for their unique way of passing down genetic information through generations. Unlike other repetitive sequences, REPINs are inherited vertically, meaning they are passed from parent to offspring rather than moving between different organisms.
The Importance of Studying REPINs
Understanding REPINs can give insights into how bacteria evolve and how they adapt to their environments. By studying these sequences, scientists can estimate things like how often REPINs duplicate themselves and how quickly they can change over time. However, figuring out these rates has been tricky because they rely on the assumption that mutations in REPINs happen at steady rates. To improve accuracy, researchers are looking for alternative methods that do not depend solely on looking at the DNA itself.
Insertion Sequences: A Different Approach
Insertion sequences are another form of repetitive element found in Bacterial Genomes. Unlike REPINs, these can move around more freely between different bacteria. They have been studied much more thoroughly, allowing scientists to measure Duplication Rates in controlled laboratory conditions.
Studying how insertion sequences spread can help researchers learn more about their role in evolution. They can look at whether these sequences insert themselves into the same locations repeatedly or whether they pass down through generations in a consistent manner.
Challenges in Gene Relationships
Even when looking at genes that do not repeat, determining relationships between different genes can be complicated. Researchers use various methods to identify whether genes in different organisms come from a common ancestor or whether they have diverged from each other due to duplication events.
Recognizing the differences between these types of gene relationships is key. Genes that come from a common ancestor usually perform similar tasks, while those derived from duplication may have adapted to take on different functions.
Introducing REPORTH: A New Tool
To better study repetitive sequences, a new tool called REPORTH has been created. REPORTH helps find the locations of repetitive sequences across similar bacterial strains by analyzing the genes surrounding them. It does this by comparing the sequences around the repetitive elements to see if they are similar across different genomes.
For example, REPORTH has been tested using 42 strains of a specific bacterium. By identifying the repetitive sequences in these bacteria, researchers can understand how these sequences have changed over time and how they relate to each other.
How REPORTH Works
To use REPORTH, researchers need closely related bacterial genomes and the locations of the repetitive sequences they want to analyze. They can provide this information through different formats, including a specific output from another program designed to identify these sequences.
When REPORTH gets this information, it looks at the sequences surrounding each repetitive element to find connections between them. It then groups sequences that show high similarities based on their surroundings. This allows researchers to see which sequences are related even across different strains of bacteria.
The Proof of Principle with Pseudomonas chlororaphis
REPORTH was applied to analyze the repetitive sequences found in 42 strains of the bacterium Pseudomonas chlororaphis. In these genomes, a significant number of REPINs were identified, highlighting that many of these sequences occur in specific locations within the DNA. However, not every genome has the same repetitions, suggesting changes in the genetic makeup over time.
By applying REPORTH, researchers found that there are many clusters of REPINs, indicating their presence in similar locations across different strains. This allows for a better understanding of how these sequences can change and adapt with each generation.
Flanking Sequences
UnderstandingEach repetitive sequence is often surrounded by other genes, referred to as flanking sequences. By studying these flanking sequences, researchers can gain insights into how repetitive sequences are distributed and how they evolve over time.
In the analyzed genomes, it was found that flanking sequences are highly similar among orthologous groups. This high level of similarity supports the idea that REPINs exist in conserved locations, despite the variations between different strains. This helps reinforce the method used by REPORTH in grouping these repetitive sequences accurately.
Rare Instances of Incorrect Clustering
While REPORTH shows a high level of accuracy in grouping repetitive sequences, there is always a chance of misidentifying relationships between genes, especially when dealing with paralogous sequences. However, the evidence suggests that the tool remains reliable, as only a small fraction of clusters could potentially be affected by such errors.
Future Directions for REPORTH
The potential for REPORTH to provide valuable insights does not end with REPINs alone. Researchers are also planning to explore its use in studying other forms of repetitive sequences, like insertion sequences. By examining how these sequences behave across different genomes, scientists hope to uncover various evolutionary patterns.
While REPORTH currently works best with closely related bacteria, there is a need for similar tools that can analyze more distantly related genomes. Such tools could enhance our understanding of highly conserved sequences, such as those found in ribosomal RNA genes, leading to new discoveries in the field of genetics.
Conclusion: The Value of REPORTH
REPORTH represents a significant advancement in the study of repetitive sequences in bacterial genomes. By allowing researchers to identify and analyze these sequences across closely related strains, it opens up new avenues for understanding their evolution. The tool's ability to provide detailed information on the relationships between repetitive sequences has the potential to fill gaps in our understanding of bacterial genetics. As research continues, REPORTH promises to be a valuable resource for unlocking the secrets held within genomic sequences.
Title: REPORTH: Determining orthologous locations of repetitive sequences between genomes
Abstract: Repetitive sequences are a common feature of bacterial genomes. Some repetitive sequences such as REPINs are mobile within the genome but inherited only vertically from mother to daughter across bacterial genomes. Selfish elements in contrast are mobile within the genome but also travel horizontally from genome to genome. Yet, no matter the nature of the association between the repetitive elements and the host, it is difficult to study the evolutionary dynamics of repetitive sequences across genomes. If it is unclear whether two sequences in two different genomes are in orthologous positions, it is difficult to infer parameters like the replication rate, horizontal transfer rate and rate of loss. Here we present a tool to facilitate these analyses called REPORTH. REPORTH determines whether repetitive sequences in different but closely related bacterial genomes occur in orthologous genomic positions. Whether a position is orthologous or not depends on the orthology of flanking sequences. Flanking sequences are deemed orthologous if they are bidirectional best hits. All repetitive sequences that are found in orthologous positions across different genomes are grouped together. Analyses of these groups can be used to study the evolutionary dynamics of selfish repetitive elements such as insertion sequences, but also for mutualistic repetitive elements such as REPINs.
Authors: Frederic Bertels, P. V. Bharadwaj, B. van Dijk
Last Update: 2024-10-17 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.14.618302
Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.14.618302.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.