Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology# Bioengineering

Advancements in Adoptive Cell Therapy for Cancer

New methods enhance T cell modifications for cancer treatment.

Melita Irving, E. Dzafo, M. Hafezi, G. M. P. Giordano Attianese, P. Reichenbach, S. Grillet, K. Scholten, G. Coukos, B. Gentner

― 5 min read


New Hope in Cancer CellNew Hope in Cancer CellTherapytreatment prospects.Improved T cell editing enhances cancer
Table of Contents

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) is a treatment method that uses a patient’s own immune cells to fight cancer. This approach is especially promising for patients with advanced cancer. One method within ACT involves taking tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) from a patient’s tumor sample, expanding them in the lab, and then reintroducing them into the patient. This method has been successful in some cases, particularly for metastatic melanoma. However, there are challenges. Not all tumors show signs of inflammation, which makes it harder to find the right immune cells, and sometimes these specific cells can be hard to grow in sufficient numbers.

Another way to improve ACT involves using T cells from the patient’s blood, which can be modified in the lab. These T cells can be genetically changed to target cancer cells more effectively. This is done using a tool called a T Cell Receptor (TCR) or a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), which helps the immune system recognize and attack the cancer.

The Use of Genetic Engineering

Most T cells that are modified for treatment are done so using viral vectors, which are like viruses that can insert new genes into cells. While these methods have been fairly safe, they come with risks, such as possible changes to DNA that could lead to other issues. Additionally, the strong signals used to activate the modified T cells may cause them to wear out too quickly.

A newer method uses CRISPR/Cas9, a precise tool for editing genes. This method allows scientists to place TCRs into specific parts of the T cell’s DNA, which helps create a more stable and consistent way of expressing these receptors. Early studies have shown that this technique is promising for producing effective T cells that can target specific cancer markers.

Improving Gene Editing Efficiency

When CRISPR/Cas9 creates breaks in DNA, the cell can repair these breaks using two main methods. The first is called non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), which is quick but can lead to errors. The second, called homology-directed repair (HDR), is more accurate but less common. Researchers are looking into ways to encourage cells to use HDR for better results in gene editing. One promising way to do this is by using certain drugs that inhibit the NHEJ pathway, allowing more cells to use HDR.

In studies, certain Inhibitors have shown to help increase the efficiency of gene editing in T cells. These results can lead to better methods for creating modified T cells that can effectively target cancer.

Experimental Design

To see how different drugs that inhibit NHEJ affect gene editing in T cells, researchers conducted experiments. They compared several inhibitors, including M3814, PI-103, and samotolisib. The results indicated that these drugs could significantly improve gene editing efficiency in T cells. The researchers developed a lab process that aligns with good manufacturing practices (GMP), ensuring that the T cells could be produced safely and effectively for clinical use.

In one part of the study, researchers focused on introducing a marker gene into T cells, which would allow them to track how well gene editing was working. They used an electroporation method to introduce the CRISPR system and the gene into the T cells. This method involved applying an electric field to help the DNA enter the cells.

After electroporation and treatment with the inhibitors, the modified T cells were assessed for their ability to express the new gene. Results showed that the use of these inhibitors led to a notable increase in gene expression compared to controls.

GMP-Compatible Process

To make this process suitable for clinical settings, the researchers refined their methods further. They developed a way to introduce a TCR for a specific cancer marker (NY-ESO-1) into T cells while ensuring that the process met GMP standards.

In this optimized process, T cells were again modified using CRISPR/Cas9 to express both a specific TCR and a marker for tracking. This time, the cells were treated with the inhibitors right after gene editing and then cultured in a GMP-compatible environment for several days.

Results from this step of the research indicated a significant increase in the efficiency of gene editing compared to previous attempts. T cells that were treated with the inhibitors showed higher levels of both the TCR marker and the tracking marker.

Assessing Impact on T Cell Survival and Expansion

A crucial part of developing modified T cells is ensuring they remain healthy and can grow well. In the study, researchers evaluated how well the treated T cells survived and expanded (increased in number) after gene editing. They found that while there was a slight decrease in overall cell viability in treated groups compared to controls, the modified cells still maintained a good survival rate.

Most importantly, the T cells maintained a certain type of phenotype, or characteristic, which is desirable for long-term effectiveness against tumors. Researchers noted that a good portion of T cells remained in a naïve-like state, which is beneficial for endurance and effectiveness in fighting off cancer.

Conclusion

This research indicates that using CRISPR/Cas9 along with specific inhibitors can greatly improve the process of modifying T cells for cancer treatments. The work demonstrates a potential pathway for creating effective engineered T cells that meet safety standards for clinical application. While the current findings are promising, further studies are needed to determine long-term effects and safety in patients.

As scientists continue to refine these methods, there is hope that personalized T cell therapies can play a significant role in treating various types of cancer in the future. With ongoing research, we can look forward to more effective treatments that can help improve the lives of cancer patients.

Original Source

Title: DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Inhibitors PI-103 and Samotolisib Augment CRISPR/Cas9 Knockin Efficiency in Human T Cells

Abstract: 1.The adoptive cell transfer of ex vivo expanded tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (i.e., TIL therapy) is a promising clinical strategy and recently FDA approved for melanoma but has major limitations including that not all tumors are inflamed. Moreover, tumor-specific clones can be rare and in an exhausted state due to the suppressive tumor microenvironment. These obstacles can be overcome by engineering autologous peripheral blood T cells with pre-selected T cell receptors (TCRs) by viral vector-mediated gene insertion. While viral transduction is highly efficient, the insertional site is not specific and persistence of the T cells is oftentimes limited. In contrast, site-specific integration of the TCR into the TCR chain (TRAC) locus by CRISPR/Cas9 has been shown to enable more consistent and physiological levels of exogenous TCR expression coupled with superior persistence and tumor control in preclinical studies. Here, we sought to improve the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 mediated TCR knockin (KI) into the TRAC locus of primary human T cells. In addition to the previously reported DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor M3814, we demonstrate that PI-103 and samotolisib markedly increase KI efficiency in a process that is GMP-compatible, while CC-115 had a variable effect. Importantly, PI-103 and samotolisib do not negatively impact cell viability, fold-expansion nor T cell phenotype and we conclude that they are suitable for the generation of gene-modified T cells for clinical use.

Authors: Melita Irving, E. Dzafo, M. Hafezi, G. M. P. Giordano Attianese, P. Reichenbach, S. Grillet, K. Scholten, G. Coukos, B. Gentner

Last Update: 2024-10-22 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.18.618985

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.18.618985.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles