Understanding HCMV Infection and Latency in Immune Cells
Research reveals how HCMV interacts with immune cells during infection and latency.
Michal Schwartz, Y. Kitsberg, A. Nachshon, t. arazi, T. Fisher, A. Wainstein, Y. Finkel, N. Stern-Ginossar
― 7 min read
Table of Contents
- HCMV Latency and Reactivation
- Early Stages of HCMV Infection in Monocytes
- Measurements of Viral Gene Expression
- Changes in Cell Surface Proteins Upon Differentiation
- Entry Efficiency and HCMV Infection in Monocytes
- Importance of Cell Proliferation on HCMV Infection
- Transcriptome Analysis
- Effects of Oxidative Phosphorylation on HCMV Infection
- Genome-wide CRISPR Screen
- Conclusion
- Original Source
Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a virus that affects a large portion of the global population. It belongs to the herpesvirus family and has the ability to stay in the body for life by going into a dormant state known as latency. This virus often resides in certain blood cells, particularly those involved in the immune system. Among these, specific stem cells in the bone marrow and certain white blood cells, called Monocytes, play important roles in HCMV's behavior.
Monocytes usually do not support the active reproduction of HCMV. However, once these cells mature into Macrophages, they can facilitate a productive infection. This difference is crucial in understanding how HCMV operates within the body. Unfortunately, there is no perfect animal model to study HCMV latency, which means scientists rely on laboratory techniques involving human cells to gather information.
HCMV Latency and Reactivation
HCMV can stay hidden in immune cells, particularly in blood monocytes and stem cells, without causing active infection. Researchers have found that while monocytes are primarily short-lived, it is believed that the long-term storage of HCMV occurs in stem cells in the bone marrow. When monocytes change into macrophages, they become more susceptible to HCMV and allow the virus to replicate. Previous studies indicated that the levels of certain Viral genes expressed at the start of the infection are critical in determining whether the virus can produce offspring.
In this context, the cellular environment plays a vital role. Factors like the structure of the cell's genetic material (chromatin) are believed to influence whether HCMV can remain inactive or become active again. However, what exactly causes the differences in how HCMV behaves during these transitions is still not fully clear.
Early Stages of HCMV Infection in Monocytes
Recent studies have shown that when monocytes are first exposed to HCMV, the expression of early viral genes is almost nonexistent. In contrast, macrophages demonstrate a significant level of viral gene expression shortly after infection. This suggests that monocytes are unable to effectively allow the virus to replicate at the initial stages. A deeper investigation revealed that most of this variation results from significant differences in how the virus enters these different types of cells. In monocytes, the viral genomes rarely make it to the nucleus, which is where they need to be to take control of the cell's machinery for replication.
Interestingly, when researchers artificially introduced a receptor known as PDGFRα into monocytes, the cells were capable of supporting productive infection. This highlights that if the virus can enter the cell efficiently, monocytes have the potential to allow HCMV to reproduce.
Measurements of Viral Gene Expression
Using sophisticated techniques, scientists measured the levels of new viral RNA produced in monocytes and macrophages shortly after infection. They found that in monocytes, very little viral RNA was produced, while macrophages showed a robust transcription of viral genes. The lack of viral transcripts in monocytes indicates that these cells effectively repress viral activity at early stages of infection.
This early repression might be linked to the general immune response of the body. The study noted that monocytes possess high levels of certain immune genes, which decrease when they convert into macrophages. This change in gene expression suggests that the immune system is less effective against HCMV once monocytes mature.
Changes in Cell Surface Proteins Upon Differentiation
When monocytes differentiate into macrophages, they undergo a transformation in their gene expression, resulting in changes to cell surface proteins. These proteins are important for how the virus enters cells. The studies identified that the expression of certain proteins required for HCMV entry significantly increases during this differentiation phase.
While some proteins like NRP2 were studied, they did not appear to facilitate HCMV entry into macrophages. Instead, two other proteins, ITGB1 and ITGB3, which are integrins, were found to be vital for HCMV entry in macrophages. Interestingly, ITGB3 was not present in monocytes, which further clarifies why these cells do not support productive viral infection.
Entry Efficiency and HCMV Infection in Monocytes
The inability of HCMV to enter monocytes efficiently is a key factor in the overall lack of viral gene expression and subsequent productive infection in these cells. Experimental evidence showed that when monocytes were manipulated to express PDGFRα, they were able to become productively infected. The frequency of viral particles in the cytoplasm and nuclei of monocytes was significantly lower than in macrophages, underlining the importance of viral entry for HCMV replication.
To delve deeper, researchers used different methods to track the viral particles in the cells. They found that while macrophages harbored many viral genomes, monocytes had almost none in their nuclei, reinforcing the idea that HCMV fails to establish productive infections in monocytes primarily due to inefficient entry.
Proliferation on HCMV Infection
Importance of CellThe studies also revealed that the proliferation capacity of the cells influences the outcomes of HCMV infection. High proliferative rates in monocytic cell lines limited productive infection, suggesting that the stage of the cell cycle plays a role in determining susceptibility to HCMV. When monocytes differentiate into macrophages, their proliferation decreases, which might help them become more permissive to infection.
Transcriptome Analysis
To further understand the factors affecting HCMV infection, a transcriptome analysis was conducted. This analysis identified numerous genes that were upregulated during the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages. Many of these genes are related to immune signaling and cell maturation processes.
Interestingly, genes associated with oxidative phosphorylation, a process critical for energy production in cells, were also found to increase upon differentiation. This suggests that metabolic changes might confer an advantage for macrophages in supporting HCMV replication.
Effects of Oxidative Phosphorylation on HCMV Infection
Investigating the role of oxidative phosphorylation revealed that inhibiting this pathway resulted in a significant decrease in productive infection in both monocytes and macrophages. This suggests that the state of the cell's metabolism plays a significant role in the virus's ability to replicate.
By understanding how the energetic state of a cell is influenced by HCMV and its differentiation state, researchers can start to see why macrophages have an increased capacity for productive infection compared to monocytes.
Genome-wide CRISPR Screen
Using a CRISPR screen allowed researchers to identify additional barriers to productive infection in monocytes. By introducing mutations in various genes, they could assess which changes helped or hindered viral entry. Notably, several genes linked to the production and modification of certain cellular components, such as heparan sulfate proteoglycans, were identified as enhancing factors for productive infection.
This highlights the complexity of HCMV infection, as multiple cellular pathways must align for successful viral replication.
Conclusion
The findings from this research highlight the multifaceted nature of HCMV infection and latency. The differences in how monocytes and macrophages respond to HCMV can largely be explained by factors related to viral entry efficiency, cell surface protein expression, and the metabolic state of the cells.
Monocytes, while capable of harboring HCMV, are constrained by their inability to effectively allow viral entry and their high immune response. In contrast, macrophages, with their altered protein expression and reduced proliferation, create a more suitable environment for the virus to thrive.
In summary, the path from HCMV infection to latency involves a complex interplay of entry mechanisms, immune regulation, and cellular metabolism. Understanding these processes not only sheds light on HCMV's behavior but also informs potential treatment strategies for infections and related diseases.
Title: Virus Entry is a Major Determinant of HCMV Latency in Monocytes
Abstract: Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection can result in either productive or latent infection, the latter being the basis for the virus life-long persistence. Intriguingly, monocytes, which support latent infection, become permissive to productive infection upon differentiation to macrophages. However, the molecular factors explaining these differentiation-driven differences are not fully understood and have been so far attributed to chromatin-mediated repression of the viral genome. Here, by using metabolic labeling of newly synthesized RNA early in monocyte and macrophage infection, we discover a major early block in viral gene expression, and viral transcripts are barely detected in infected monocytes. By unbiasedly analyzing the changes between monocytes and their differentiated counterparts, we reveal that the levels of several cell surface proteins involved in HCMV entry are upregulated upon monocyte to macrophage differentiation, and correspondingly we uncover HCMV entry into monocytes compared to macrophages is extremely inefficient. Remarkably, ectopic expression of a canonical HCMV entry receptor in monocytes facilitates productive infection of these cells, demonstrating that given efficient viral entry, monocytes, like macrophages, have the capacity to support productive infection. Among the cell surface proteins that are upregulated upon monocyte differentiation are several integrins, which we show play an important role in HCMV entry into macrophages, partially explaining the differences in viral entry. Overall, our findings reveal that a previously unrecognized major barrier for productive infection in monocytes is entry, adding a critical layer to the paradigm of HCMV latency.
Authors: Michal Schwartz, Y. Kitsberg, A. Nachshon, t. arazi, T. Fisher, A. Wainstein, Y. Finkel, N. Stern-Ginossar
Last Update: 2024-10-27 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.26.619803
Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.26.619803.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.