Social Behavior Shapes Aggression in Fruit Flies
Study reveals how social settings influence fighting behaviors in male fruit flies.
Yufeng Pan, C. Gao, M. Ma, J. Chen, X. Ji, Q. Peng
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
- Aggression in Fruit Flies
- Social Influence on Fighting Behavior
- Establishing Tussling Behavior in Flies
- The Impact of Social Environment
- Role of Sensory Neurons
- Identifying Brain Neurons for Fighting
- The Winning Strategy: Tussling vs. Lunging
- Aging and Mating
- Summary of Findings
- Importance of the Study
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Animals compete for resources like food, territory, and mates. This competition is important for their survival and ability to reproduce. There are various ways animals can compete, and physical fighting is one common method. This fighting can be influenced by both genetics and the Social setting of the animal.
Aggression in Fruit Flies
In fruit flies, especially the species Drosophila melanogaster, male-to-male aggression can take two forms: low-intensity fights and high-intensity tussles. Low-intensity fights often involve a behavior called lunging, where one fly jumps at another. High-intensity tussles are more physical, with the flies rolling over one another. Most research has focused on the lunging behavior because it happens more often and is easier to watch.
Research has highlighted certain genes and brain circuits that control lunging behavior. For example, a specific type of pheromone influences lunging. When male fruit flies are exposed to this pheromone for a long time, their lunging decreases. In contrast, when they are alone, they tend to lunge more. This pattern of behavior has been observed in other animals, including mice and even humans.
Social Influence on Fighting Behavior
Social interaction can impact how aggressive an animal is. For instance, being with other flies can make them less likely to lunge but can increase high-intensity tussling. Moreover, male flies that are socially engaged tend to have better mating success because they become more sensitive to Pheromones, which are chemical signals shared between males and females. Interestingly, while social interaction can decrease lunging, it appears to boost tussling behavior.
Establishing Tussling Behavior in Flies
To study tussling, researchers created a new method that involved placing a fixed virgin female fruit fly in the center of a food area. This setup encouraged more tussling among the male flies. In this setup, it was observed that male flies kept in groups tussled more than those kept alone. Older males, specifically those around 14 days old, showed more tussling behavior than younger males.
Additionally, the type of food also played a role. When older males had food rich in yeast, they were more likely to tussle, with more than 70% of males engaging in this behavior.
The Impact of Social Environment
Previous studies suggested that social engagement reduces low-intensity fighting, like lunging. When comparing both behaviors in flies that were kept alone versus those in groups, it was found that the group-housed males lunged less but tussled more. This points to the fact that being socially active can inhibit some behaviors while enhancing others.
Neurons
Role of SensoryTo understand how social experiences affect tussling, researchers looked at specific neurons in the flies' brains. Certain neurons related to pheromones were found to be responsible for tussling behavior, while other neurons controlled lunging. The olfactory receptor Or47b was particularly important for promoting tussling. This receptor responds to pheromones and becomes more active in social settings.
When the activity of Or47b was blocked, tussling behavior decreased. Conversely, blocking the neurons that facilitate lunging did not affect tussling. This distinction is crucial for comprehending how social experience shapes aggressive behavior in flies.
Identifying Brain Neurons for Fighting
Next, researchers aimed to find the central brain neurons responsible for tussling. They discovered that silencing certain regions, like the known aggression-promoting neurons, did not alter tussling behavior, suggesting a unique circuit for this type of fighting. Among these neurons, the pC1SS2 neurons, which are less known, were found to specifically promote tussling in males.
The Winning Strategy: Tussling vs. Lunging
To see which behavior was more effective in fighting for territory and mates, scientists set up experiments where male flies could compete for resources. Early findings showed that male flies kept in social groups had a slight advantage over those kept alone, especially as they aged. The older males that experienced social enrichment showed more success in claiming territory and mating opportunities compared to isolated males.
When young males were tested, there was no significant advantage for those kept in groups versus those alone. However, in older males, social experiences significantly improved their chances in competition.
Aging and Mating
As males aged, they generally became less competitive in mating. Nevertheless, older males who had social experiences were found to be more competitive than isolated ones. This suggests that social experience can help offset some disadvantages that come with aging.
Summary of Findings
Overall, social experiences shape how male fruit flies approach fighting and mating. Group-housed males tend to engage in less frequent but more intense tussling behaviors, which can lead to better success in competing for territory and mates. This research shows that the two types of fighting have different underlying sensory processes and brain circuits.
Importance of the Study
Understanding how social experiences affect aggression can clarify how animals interact. Although social isolation often increases aggression, it can simultaneously lessen mating success. This study of tussling versus lunging behaviors helps resolve the tension between aggression and reproduction, showing that these behaviors are regulated differently and have distinct roles in survival and mating strategies.
Conclusion
This study adds to the understanding of how social environments can influence fighting strategies in animals. By recognizing the different sensory pathways and brain neurons that govern lunging and tussling, researchers can better understand aggression and reproductive success in social contexts. The findings suggest that, for older males, social experiences might be key to enhancing competitiveness despite the effects of aging, which could have broader implications across species.
Title: Social Experience Shapes Fighting Strategies for Reproductive Success
Abstract: Social isolation generally increases aggression but decreases mating competition, resulting in an intricate and ambiguous relationship between social experience, aggression, and reproductive success. In male Drosophila, aggression is often characterized by lunging, a frequent and comparatively gentle combat behavior. Here, we establish a behavioral paradigm for studying a less frequent but more vigorous fighting form known as tussling. We discover that while social enrichment decreases lunging, aligning with past observations, it heightens the more forceful tussling behavior. These two forms of aggression rely on different olfactory receptor neurons, specifically Or67d for lunging and Or47b for tussling. We further identify three pairs of central pC1 neurons that specifically promote tussling. Moreover, shifting from lunging to tussling in socially enriched males facilitates better territory control and mating success, mitigating the disadvantages associated with aging. These findings reveal how social experience shapes fighting strategies to optimize reproductive success.
Authors: Yufeng Pan, C. Gao, M. Ma, J. Chen, X. Ji, Q. Peng
Last Update: 2024-10-26 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.25.620166
Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.25.620166.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.