Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Statistics# Methodology# Computation# Machine Learning

A New Approach to Network Clustering

Introducing a model for better connections and clustering in networks.

Iuliia Promskaia, Adrian O'Hagan, Michael Fop

― 6 min read


Improving NetworkImproving NetworkAnalysis Techniquesinsights in network data.A new model enhances clustering and
Table of Contents

In various fields, network data help to represent connections between entities, whether they are people, countries, or organizations. These connections can vary in strength, which means some relationships may be more important or influential than others. A common goal in analyzing these networks is to group similar nodes, meaning finding clusters of nodes that share similar patterns of connections.

Clustering helps us understand the structure of a network better. However, traditional clustering methods tend to overlook the differences in the abilities of nodes to connect with each other. This often causes clustering results to be influenced by these individual strengths, leading to misleading conclusions. One potential solution is to look at the strength of connections in relative terms instead of absolute values. By doing this, we can express each connection as a proportion of the total capacity of the respective node.

While this approach could enhance clustering results, current methods may not be equipped to handle the additional complexities that come with this shift. This paper introduces a new model that accounts for these nuances in composition-weighted networks.

The Challenge of Network Analysis

Networks, whether they are social networks, transportation systems, or other types, often reflect how entities interact with one another. The strength of these interactions can impact how we view clusters in the network. When clustering nodes, traditional methods rely on raw connection strengths. However, this can lead to problems if some nodes have a significantly higher capacity to connect than others.

For instance, in a network of student exchanges, larger countries may naturally have more students participating simply because they have larger populations. If we cluster based on student numbers alone, larger countries may dominate the clusters, masking real patterns of preference and connection.

To overcome this issue, one effective strategy is to look at connections in relative terms. By considering how each connection stands in relation to the sending or receiving capacity of each node, we can achieve a fairer representation of connections. This method may lead to more accurate clustering results.

Stochastic Block Models

Stochastic block models (SBMs) are a well-known framework for clustering in networks. They analyze the connectivity patterns between nodes, suggesting that connections are determined by the clusters to which the nodes belong. The basic idea is that nodes in the same cluster will connect with one another more often than nodes from different clusters.

While originally designed for binary data, SBMs have evolved to handle different types of connections, including weighted networks. However, many current extensions still focus on analyzing connection strengths in their original form, which ignores the complexities introduced by relative strength.

This paper presents a new model, the Dirichlet stochastic block model (DirSBM), which addresses these challenges by directly modeling the composition of edge weights using a Dirichlet distribution.

Proposed Model Overview

The DirSBM utilizes the idea of compositional data, which refers to data that represent parts of a whole, such as proportions. By modeling the strengths of connections in relation to the nodes' capabilities, the DirSBM provides a more nuanced understanding of the network.

We begin by defining a network as a directed graph, where nodes signify entities and edges represent connections with weights that indicate their strength. The model assumes that these edges are driven by the composition of sending and receiving nodes, leading to a more accurate clustering outcome.

Inference in the model is performed using a classification expectation-maximization algorithm. This algorithm helps to estimate parameters while dealing with the complexities of the model. The paper also discusses methods for selecting the optimal number of clusters in a network using an integrated completed likelihood criterion.

Key Features of the DirSBM

Interpretation of Parameters

The DirSBM allows for a more intuitive interpretation of its parameters. Rather than focusing solely on the Dirichlet distribution, we can calculate expected proportions of connections, making it easier to understand how nodes share connections. This new insight improves our ability to analyze the flow of interactions between different clusters.

Hybrid Likelihood Approach

The hybrid likelihood framework employed in DirSBM simplifies the inference process. By assuming a working independence among cluster assignments, we can calculate the likelihood more efficiently than traditional methods allow. The complete data hybrid log-likelihood enables better estimation of model parameters and cluster assignments.

Initializing the Model

Choosing the right starting point for any clustering algorithm is critical since many algorithms can converge to local maximums. The paper examines various initialization strategies such as random assignments, k-means clustering, and others. Each method has different benefits, and the results highlight that even a random strategy can perform well in certain situations.

Simulation Studies

To evaluate the performance of the DirSBM, extensive simulation studies were conducted. Various network sizes and parameter settings were tested to see how well the model could recover true clustering structures. The studies assessed Parameter Estimation quality and how well clusters could be identified.

Clustering Structure Recovery

The results from simulation studies indicate that DirSBM consistently performs well across different scenarios, particularly in terms of recovering clusters. Comparisons were made with existing models, showcasing that the new model tends to yield better performance with more consistent results.

Model Selection Performance

Selecting the correct number of clusters is crucial for accurate modeling. Using the integrated completed likelihood criterion, the DirSBM was able to correctly identify the optimal number of clusters in most scenarios, especially in larger networks.

Application to Real-World Data

Erasmus Program Data

The Erasmus exchange program presents a rich dataset for analyzing student mobility between countries. By applying DirSBM, we can reveal underlying patterns of student preferences that raw counts alone would conceal. The model highlights various clusters of countries based on their attractiveness as exchange destinations.

London Bike Sharing Data

Similarly, the London bike-sharing data allows us to explore connectivity patterns between stations. By fitting the DirSBM to this data, we can visualize clusters of bike stations and how they serve their local areas. The results demonstrate strong connections with geographical locations, reinforcing the model's ability to reveal meaningful patterns in network data.

Conclusion

The Dirichlet stochastic block model provides a new and effective framework for analyzing composition-weighted networks. By considering edge weights as proportions, this model overcomes the limitations of traditional methods, allowing for more accurate clustering and parameter estimation.

The paper outlines the model's features, its performance in simulations, and its ability to uncover real-world patterns in data from student exchanges and bike-sharing networks. Future work could further refine the model, exploring ways to introduce structural zeros and alternative distributions to enhance its flexibility and application to a broader range of network types.

Overall, the DirSBM represents a significant step forward in the analysis of complex networks, providing intuitive insights into how nodes relate to one another through their connections.

Original Source

Title: A Dirichlet stochastic block model for composition-weighted networks

Abstract: Network data are observed in various applications where the individual entities of the system interact with or are connected to each other, and often these interactions are defined by their associated strength or importance. Clustering is a common task in network analysis that involves finding groups of nodes displaying similarities in the way they interact with the rest of the network. However, most clustering methods use the strengths of connections between entities in their original form, ignoring the possible differences in the capacities of individual nodes to send or receive edges. This often leads to clustering solutions that are heavily influenced by the nodes' capacities. One way to overcome this is to analyse the strengths of connections in relative rather than absolute terms, expressing each edge weight as a proportion of the sending (or receiving) capacity of the respective node. This, however, induces additional modelling constraints that most existing clustering methods are not designed to handle. In this work we propose a stochastic block model for composition-weighted networks based on direct modelling of compositional weight vectors using a Dirichlet mixture, with the parameters determined by the cluster labels of the sender and the receiver nodes. Inference is implemented via an extension of the classification expectation-maximisation algorithm that uses a working independence assumption, expressing the complete data likelihood of each node of the network as a function of fixed cluster labels of the remaining nodes. A model selection criterion is derived to aid the choice of the number of clusters. The model is validated using simulation studies, and showcased on network data from the Erasmus exchange program and a bike sharing network for the city of London.

Authors: Iuliia Promskaia, Adrian O'Hagan, Michael Fop

Last Update: 2024-08-01 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00651

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.00651

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles