Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology# Neuroscience

How Neural Network Structure Influences Information Processing

Examining the role of connection patterns in neural networks and their impact on information encoding.

Hannah Choi, Z. Mobille, U. B. Sikandar, S. Sponberg

― 6 min read


Neural Networks:Neural Networks:Structure and Functionaffect coding and information flow.Investigating how neural structures
Table of Contents

The neural systems in animals are made up of complex networks. These networks have a specific way of connecting, which is not random. Understanding how these connections impact how information is shared and processed is important. One key idea is to look at the patterns of connections, known as "motifs," that are more common in nature than what would happen by chance.

Two common types of connections in these networks are "Convergent" and "Divergent" pathways. A convergent pathway occurs when many neurons connect to a smaller group of neurons. In contrast, a divergent pathway happens when a small group of neurons connects to many other neurons. These kinds of structures are seen in various parts of the nervous system, including the visual system and the cerebellum.

While these structures are present, scientists are still figuring out how they function. Previous research has shown that convergent pathways can work well with certain types of activation functions, improving how information is coded. Other studies have looked at situations where a small group of neurons connects to a larger group, showing that this setup helps with information transfer and reduces noise.

Information Bottlenecks

There’s another concept known as the information bottleneck. This is a method for finding the most relevant information that one variable has about another by compressing the information. This method considers the trade-off between making predictions and compressing data. It has been used to understand learning in artificial neural networks and the architecture of these networks.

Recent studies have tried to apply this idea to biological neural networks to see how the structure affects information processing, especially regarding how neurons fire. However, there’s still much unknown about how the structure affects coding in real-life situations, especially with the timing of neuron firing.

With growing evidence that the timing of these spikes carries more information than just the number of spikes, understanding the role of Spike Timing becomes crucial. Timing at the sensory input level, and even at output levels, shows that variations in spike timing can encode a lot of important information.

Structural Convergence and Divergence in Neural Pathways

The relationship between structural convergence and divergence is especially interesting in the complex pathways that connect sensory inputs to motor outputs. This includes multiple stages where neuron populations interact. For example, in the visual system of vertebrates, there are various stages from early visual processing to the parts of the brain that coordinate movement.

One classic study suggested that certain brain areas use a spike count approach due to variability in how neurons fire. Other research indicates that counting spikes only explains a small part of the activity in specific brain areas. While single-neuron counting is useful, it is also slow and less informative. Larger groups of neurons may use counting to represent signals because the noise is reduced, while precise timing could offer more information from fewer neurons.

Some experiments have tested the impact of precise timing in various brain areas and have shown that neurons after a convergence point may benefit from encoding information over time. This means they can capture valuable information over shorter periods, leading to better processing.

Goals of the Study

The aim of this study is to systematically explore how the structure of neural networks influences their coding strategies, especially focusing on spikes in neurons. The primary hypothesis is that neurons following a convergence point will benefit more from precise spike timing compared to those in an expansion layer.

To test this, researchers will use models of spiking neural networks and analyze how various layers encode information. They will also evaluate how different structures affect how well these networks can decode information at different temporal resolutions.

The approach involves training simple feedforward spiking neural networks with varying layers and analyzing the resulting spike trains. The focus will be on understanding the relationship between structure and coding strategies.

Network Structure and Training

To investigate the role of convergence and divergence in neural networks, a three-layer feedforward network will be set up. The neurons will be modeled after real biological neurons, focusing on how they interact based on their connections. Researchers will vary the number of neurons in the middle layer while keeping the input and output layers the same size to create different levels of structural divergence and convergence.

Through specific training processes, the model will learn to predict stimuli, and researchers will examine how effectively it responds to different temporal resolutions of spike data.

The training of these networks involves optimizing parameters to achieve the best performance. After the networks have been trained, researchers will use the resulting data to decode the Stimulus using different spike counting methods.

Understanding Spike Timing and Count Coding

The key aspect of the analysis will be the relationship between the timing of neuron spikes and how this impacts information encoding. When researchers analyze how accurately the model represents different stimuli, they will consider how the structure of the network contributes to this representation.

By varying the way spikes are counted-whether by precise timing or simple counting-researchers can see how well the model performs in different network configurations. This will allow for clearer insights into how different structures influence encoding strategies.

Testing Different Stimuli

After establishing a base model and analyzing its performance with set stimuli, the next step will involve testing how well the network responds to different kinds of stimuli. Researchers will evaluate the network's response to both simple, predictable signals like continuous sine waves, and more complex, unpredictable signals.

This aspect of the study will help reveal whether certain structures perform better under specific types of stimuli. For instance, do convergent pathways excel in encoding fast-changing signals, while divergent pathways hold their ground in conveying less dynamic information?

Application to Biological Systems

Once the models have been tested in a controlled environment with different stimuli, the next phase is to apply these findings to real biological systems. This will involve looking at specific neural pathways in creatures like the hawkmoth, which serves as a useful example due to its well-defined neural structure.

The objective will be to see if the patterns observed in the models can be replicated in biological systems, providing deeper insights into how neural pathways optimize information processing. This step will also include comparisons with experimental data from studies of hawkmoth behaviors during complex tasks such as tracking moving flowers.

Conclusion

The study's goal is to better understand how the structure of neural networks, particularly through convergent and divergent pathways, impacts their function. By analyzing various spiking neuron models, researchers aim to shed light on the relationship between network structure and coding strategies.

This understanding can potentially lead to broader implications in neuroscience, robotics, and artificial intelligence, where information processing systems can benefit from insights gained about neural architectures in biology. As researchers work towards solidifying these relationships, the hope is to not only deepen scientific knowledge but also enhance technological applications that mimic natural systems.

Original Source

Title: Temporal resolution of spike coding in feedforward networks with signal convergence and divergence

Abstract: Convergent and divergent structures in the networks that make up biological brains are found across many species and brain regions at various spatial scales. Neurons in these networks fire action potentials, or "spikes", whose precise timing is becoming increasingly appreciated as large sources of information about both sensory input and motor output. While previous theories on coding in convergent and divergent networks have largely neglected the role of precise spike timing, our model and analyses place this aspect at the forefront. For a suite of stimuli with different timescales, we demonstrate that structural bottlenecks- small groups of neurons post-synaptic to network convergence - have a stronger preference for spike timing codes than expansion layers created by structural divergence. Additionally, we found that a simple network model based on convergence and divergence ratios of a hawkmoth (Manduca sexta) nervous system can reproduce the relative contribution of spike timing information in its motor output, providing testable predictions on optimal temporal resolutions of spike coding across the moth sensory-motor pathway at both the single-neuron and population levels. Our simulations and analyses suggest a relationship between the level of convergent/divergent structure present in a feedforward network and the loss of stimulus information encoded by its population spike trains as their temporal resolution decreases, which could be tested experimentally across diverse neural systems in future studies. We further show that this relationship can be generalized across different spike-generating models and measures of coding capacity, implying a potentially fundamental link between network structure and coding strategy using spikes. Author summaryWithin the complex anatomy of the brain, there are certain structures that appear more often than expected. One example of this is when large populations of neurons connect to much smaller populations, and vice versa. We refer to these structural patterns as network convergence and divergence; they are observed in systems like the cerebellum, insect olfactory networks, visuomotor pathways, and the early visual system of mammals. Despite the ubiquity of this connectivity pattern, we are only beginning to understand its functional implications from a computational point of view. Here, we construct and analyze mathematical models of spiking neural networks to understand how convergent and divergent structure shapes the way that information is represented in each part of the network, as a function of the temporal resolution of population spiking activity. We then developed a simple feedforward network model of the visuomotor pathway of a moth, with similar convergent/divergent network structure, and reproduce a similar proportion of spike timing to spike count information as observed experimentally. Our results form predictions about spike coding in populations previously unobserved in experiment.

Authors: Hannah Choi, Z. Mobille, U. B. Sikandar, S. Sponberg

Last Update: 2024-10-28 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.08.602598

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.08.602598.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles