The Role of Brevican in Memory and Learning
This article discusses how brevican impacts memory and learning in the brain.
― 7 min read
Table of Contents
- The Role of Dendritic Spines in Learning
- Understanding the Extracellular Matrix
- Proteolytic Cleavage of Brevican
- Brevican and Neuronal Activity
- Role of Astrocytes
- Impact of Glutamate Receptors
- Link Between Brevican Cleavage and Learning
- Structural Plasticity and Learning
- Brevican and Memory Formation
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Memory is a key function of the brain, involving the creation of new memories while keeping older ones intact. This is a complex process that requires changes in the networks of neurons (nerve cells) in the brain. Neurons communicate through small connections called synapses, where structures known as Dendritic Spines play an important role. Dendritic spines are where most of the brain's signaling happens, and they can change in size and shape based on activity. This ability to change is called plasticity and is crucial for learning and memory.
The Role of Dendritic Spines in Learning
Dendritic spines can rapidly change when neurons are active. These changes can involve the formation of new spines shortly after learning has taken place. For instance, in young animals, spines often change shape and size more readily than in adult animals. In adults, neurons are surrounded by a protective structure called the Extracellular Matrix (ECM) that helps keep synapses stable. However, this matrix can also limit how much change can happen in adult brains, making it harder for them to adapt compared to younger brains.
Some experiments have shown that breaking down components of the ECM can help restore some of the brain's ability to change. For example, when enzymes that break down ECM are injected into specific brain areas, signs of youthful plasticity can return. This suggests that the ECM has a significant impact on how well the brain can adapt and learn in adulthood.
Understanding the Extracellular Matrix
The ECM has different forms. One form is dense and surrounds certain inhibitory neurons, while the other is more spread out and surrounds almost all neurons. Although they look different, both forms are made of similar components that include glycoproteins and proteoglycans. Key components of the matrix include proteins like brevican and aggrecan, which play a significant role in limiting how much the brain can adapt.
Brevican is particularly abundant in the adult brain and is crucial for the structure of the ECM. It consists of several parts, including a region that binds to hyaluronic acid, a sugar that is also part of the matrix. This structure allows brevican to connect with other molecules in the matrix or on the surface of cells.
Proteolytic Cleavage of Brevican
Brevican can be broken down by specific proteins called metalloproteases. This process happens at specific sites on the protein, separating parts of it and changing how the ECM operates. We think this might be a natural way for the brain to allow more flexibility in its structure, especially when learning new information.
To test this idea, researchers induced a type of lasting change in brain slices taken from young adult rats. They used chemical methods to stimulate brain activity and then measured how much brevican was broken down. Results showed a significant increase in brevican breakdown after the stimulation. Importantly, using specific inhibitors that block the action of metalloproteases prevented this breakdown, indicating that these enzymes are necessary for brevican processing.
Brevican and Neuronal Activity
When neurons are active, there are changes not just in the neurons themselves but also in the ECM they are surrounded by. The study of brevican showed that its cleavage happened in parts of the brain rich in synapses, which are the connections between neurons. By using antibodies to visualize the parts of brevican, researchers found that the cleaved fragments were present in these active areas.
The activation of brevican breakdown is influenced by other proteins that help activate the metalloproteases. These proteins must be active for the cleavage to occur. When researchers used special inhibitors for these activating proteins, they observed that the breakdown of brevican was blocked.
Astrocytes
Role ofAstrocytes, a type of brain cell, play a crucial role in supporting neurons and their functions. They release D-serine, a molecule that enhances the activity of NMDA receptors on neurons. NMDA receptors are important for synaptic plasticity and learning. In experiments where astrocyte function was disrupted, the breakdown of brevican was significantly reduced, showing that astrocytes are necessary for its cleavage. The addition of D-serine restored the cleavage process, emphasizing the astrocytes' supportive role.
Glutamate Receptors
Impact ofDifferent receptors on neurons also influence how brevican is processed. Researchers used blockers for specific receptors while inducing chemical changes. The results showed that blocking certain receptors prevented the breakdown of brevican, indicating that postsynaptic activation of these receptors is vital for this process.
In summary, the activity of proteins involved in signaling, such as NMDA receptors and other glutamate receptors, is necessary for brevican processing. This activation leads to changes in the ECM, allowing for structural adaptations in the brain.
Link Between Brevican Cleavage and Learning
A key question is whether the cleavage of brevican is necessary for learning to happen. Researchers looked at the phosphorylation of certain signaling molecules associated with learning after inducing chemical changes. They found that even when brevican breakdown was inhibited, important signaling processes remained unaffected, suggesting that brevican cleavage is not essential for the immediate initiation of learning.
However, when it came to structural changes in the brain, the absence of brevican cleavage hindered the formation of new dendritic protrusions. This indicates that while the biochemical signals for learning can occur without brevican processing, the structural changes necessary for long-term adaptations depend on it.
Structural Plasticity and Learning
Learning processes involve not only the changes in signaling but also structural changes in the neurons. These structural changes, like the formation of new dendritic spines, are essential for the brain to store new information. When researchers induced chemical changes in brain slices, they observed an increase in new dendritic protrusions. However, if metalloprotease activity was blocked, the formation of these dendritic structures did not occur, indicating that brevican processing is critical for physical adaptations in the neural networks.
Brevican and Memory Formation
The presence of the ECM around neurons serves as a foundation for their activity. While memory formation primarily relies on the ability of neurons to change and adapt, the role of the ECM is often overlooked. The ECM can restrict or facilitate neural plasticity. Studies show that the breakdown of components like brevican can lead to better adaptability of the brain, as seen in experiments where the degradation of ECM restored youthful neural plasticity.
Recent findings also highlight the dynamic nature of the ECM, suggesting that not only is its breakdown necessary for gaining new forms of plasticity, but its restoration is also essential for stabilizing new memories.
Conclusion
Memory formation, learning, and adaptations in the brain involve complex interactions between neurons and the ECM that surrounds them. Brevican, an important component of the ECM, undergoes structural changes in response to neuronal activity. The cleavage of brevican, facilitated by specific enzymes, is crucial for enabling the formation of new connections in the brain that underlie learning.
Astrocytes, glutamate receptors, and signaling cascades all contribute to the processes that regulate brevican cleavage, emphasizing the collaborative roles of different cell types and signals in the brain. While brevican processing appears not to be necessary for the immediate initiation of learning, it is essential for the structural changes that support long-term memory formation.
In the adult brain, understanding these processes may lead to insights into how we can improve learning and memory, as well as how we might address cognitive decline associated with aging or injury. The continued exploration of the ECM and its components, like brevican, will provide further clarity on the intricate workings of the brain's memory systems.
Title: Activity-dependent extracellular proteolytic cascade remodels ECM to promote structural plasticity
Abstract: The brains perineuronal extracellular matrix (ECM) is a crucial factor in maintaining the stability of mature brain circuitry. However, how is activity-induced synaptic plasticity achieved in the adult brain with a dense ECM? We hypothesized that neuronal activity induces cleavage of ECM components, creating space for synaptic rearrangements. To test this hypothesis, we investigated neuronal activity-dependent proteolytic cleavage of brevican, a prototypical perineuronal ECM proteoglycan, and its importance of this process for functional and structural synaptic plasticity in the rat hippocampus ex vivo. Our findings revealed that chemical long-term potentiation (cLTP) triggers a rapid brevican cleavage through the activation of an extracellular proteolytic cascade involving proprotein convertases and ADAMTS-4 and ADAMTS-5. This process is dependent on NMDA receptors and requires astrocytes. Interestingly, the extracellular full-length brevican increases upon cLTP, indicating a simultaneous secretion of ECM components. Interfering with cLTP-induced brevican cleavage did not impact the early LTP but prevented formation of new dendritic protrusions. Collectively, these results reveal a mechanism of activity-dependent ECM remodeling and suggest that ECM degradation is essential for structural synaptic plasticity.
Authors: Renato Frischknecht, J. B. Singh, B. Perello Amoros, J. Schneeberg, C. I. Seidenbecher, A. Fejtova, A. Dityatev
Last Update: Oct 29, 2024
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.28.620597
Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.28.620597.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.