Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology# Cancer Biology

Advances in Melanoma Treatment: A Focus on Immune Therapy

A look into how immune checkpoint blockade is changing melanoma care.

Amy Y. Huang, Kelly P. Burke, Ryan Porter, Lynn Meiger, Peter Fatouros, Jiekun Yang, Emily Robitschek, Natalie Vokes, Cora Ricker, Valeria Rosado, Giuseppe Tarantino, Jiajia Chen, Tyler J. Aprati, Marc C. Glettig, Yiwen He, Cassia Wang, Doris Fu, Li-Lun Ho, Kyriakitsa Galani, Gordon J. Freeman, Elizabeth I. Buchbinder, F. Stephen Hodi, Manolis Kellis, Genevieve M. Boland, Arlene H. Sharpe, David Liu

― 4 min read


Melanoma TreatmentMelanoma TreatmentBreakthroughsimprove patient outcomes.New insights on immune therapies
Table of Contents

Melanoma, a type of skin cancer, has seen some important changes in how it is treated, especially for advanced cases. Doctors have started using a method called Immune Checkpoint Blockade (ICB), which helps the body’s immune system fight cancer. This approach has led to impressive results for some patients, making their cancer stay away for a long time.

What is Immune Checkpoint Blockade?

Immune checkpoint blockade is a way to stop certain signals that cancer cells use to trick the immune system. By blocking these signals, the immune system can recognize and attack cancer cells more effectively. There are several ICB treatments approved for melanoma, including:

  • Anti-CTLA-4: This treatment targets a specific protein that helps cancer evade the immune system.
  • Anti-PD-1: This one helps boost the immune response against cancer.
  • Combination Therapies: Mixing treatments like anti-CTLA-4 with anti-PD-1 for a stronger punch.

How Well Do These Treatments Work?

The effectiveness and side effects of these treatments can vary. For instance, when combining anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4, about 68.6% of patients saw their cancer respond favorably after five years. However, this combination also comes with a higher chance of side effects, affecting nearly 59% of patients. In contrast, the single treatments of anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4 had lower response rates and side effects.

Why Do Some Patients Respond Better Than Others?

Researchers are keen to understand why some patients benefit greatly from these treatments while others do not. This is crucial, as it can help doctors decide the best treatment for each patient and lead to better and more effective therapies.

Over the years, many factors have been identified that might influence how well patients respond to ICB. Some love the number of changes in the tumor's DNA (tumor mutational burden). Others look at the level of certain proteins that could help predict responses. Unfortunately, many of these studies mixed different types of patients and treatments, making it hard to pinpoint what really matters.

A New Study with a Deep Dive

In a new study, researchers decided to gather a large amount of data from several previous studies to find patterns. They collected detailed information from 693 patients with advanced melanoma, focusing on information related to their tumors and the treatments they received.

They noticed that the immune environment of the tumors varied quite a bit. Thus, they split the patients into two categories based on their immune environment: “immune-high” (more immune cells) and “immune-low” (fewer immune cells). The next step involved analyzing these groups to see what factors influenced treatment responses.

Key Findings from the Study

The researchers made several important observations:

  1. Immune-High vs. Immune-Low: Patients with immune-high tumors were more likely to respond positively, especially when treated with combination therapies. This was not the case for immune-low tumors.

  2. Role of Hypoxia: Researchers found that low oxygen levels (hypoxia) in the tumor environment were linked to a lack of response to anti-PD-1 treatments, particularly in patients with immune-high tumors.

  3. Targeting HIF-2α: They identified a specific target, HIF-2α, that was particularly expressed in certain cells within tumors. They theorized that blocking HIF-2α could enhance the effectiveness of anti-PD-1 treatments.

What’s Next in the Fight Against Melanoma?

This study offers hope as it sheds light on how different factors in a patient’s tumor can influence treatment outcomes. By focusing on immune responses and specific markers like HIF-2α, researchers are paving the way for new treatment strategies.

The Importance of Personalized Medicine

The key takeaway from this study is how important it is to tailor treatments to individual patients. Not every treatment works for everyone, and understanding these differences can lead to the development of better therapies. It’s about giving patients the best chance to kick cancer to the curb.

In Summary

The battle against melanoma has evolved, thanks to innovative methods like immune checkpoint blockade. As researchers continue to unravel the mysteries of this disease, they are finding new ways to help patients fight back. With each study, there’s hope for more effective, personalized treatments that can make a real difference.

So, if you ever feel like cancer is throwing a curveball, just know that scientists are in the lab, working tirelessly to hit it out of the park for patients everywhere!

Original Source

Title: Stratified analysis identifies HIF-2α as a therapeutic target for highly immune-infiltrated melanomas

Abstract: While immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized treatment of metastatic melanoma over the last decade, the identification of broadly applicable robust biomarkers has been challenging, driven in large part by the heterogeneity of ICB regimens and patient and tumor characteristics. To disentangle these features, we performed a standardized meta-analysis of eight cohorts of patients treated with anti-PD-1 (n=290), anti-CTLA-4 (n=175), and combination anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 (n=51) with RNA sequencing of pre-treatment tumor and clinical annotations. Stratifying by immune-high vs -low tumors, we found that surprisingly, high immune infiltrate was a biomarker for response to combination ICB, but not anti-PD-1 alone. Additionally, hypoxia-related signatures were associated with non-response to anti-PD-1, but only amongst immune infiltrate-high melanomas. In a cohort of scRNA-seq of patients with metastatic melanoma, hypoxia also correlated with immunosuppression and changes in tumor-stromal communication in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Clinically actionable targets of hypoxia signaling were also uniquely expressed across different cell types. We focused on one such target, HIF-2, which was specifically upregulated in endothelial cells and fibroblasts but not in immune cells or tumor cells. HIF-2 inhibition, in combination with anti-PD-1, enhanced tumor growth control in pre-clinical models, but only in a more immune-infiltrated melanoma model. Our work demonstrates how careful stratification by clinical and molecular characteristics can be leveraged to derive meaningful biological insights and lead to the rational discovery of novel clinical targets for combination therapy.

Authors: Amy Y. Huang, Kelly P. Burke, Ryan Porter, Lynn Meiger, Peter Fatouros, Jiekun Yang, Emily Robitschek, Natalie Vokes, Cora Ricker, Valeria Rosado, Giuseppe Tarantino, Jiajia Chen, Tyler J. Aprati, Marc C. Glettig, Yiwen He, Cassia Wang, Doris Fu, Li-Lun Ho, Kyriakitsa Galani, Gordon J. Freeman, Elizabeth I. Buchbinder, F. Stephen Hodi, Manolis Kellis, Genevieve M. Boland, Arlene H. Sharpe, David Liu

Last Update: 2024-10-30 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.29.620300

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.29.620300.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles