Protein Import in Mitochondria: Key Mechanisms
This study reveals how TOMM20 and TOMM70 sort proteins for mitochondrial functions.
Ralf-Peter Jansen, S. Akram, K. I. Zittlau, B. Macek
― 7 min read
Table of Contents
- Mitochondrial Import Process
- Role of RNA-Binding Proteins
- Study of TOM Complex Interactions
- Functional Validation of Fusion Proteins
- Biotinylation Activity of Fusion Proteins
- Analysis of Protein Interactions
- Differential Interactions Under Translation Stress
- Conclusion
- Methodology Overview
- Cell Culture
- Plasmid Construction
- Generation of Stable Cell Lines
- Immunofluorescence and Cell Fractionation
- Proximity Labeling
- Mass Spectrometry Analysis
- Original Source
In eukaryotic cells, proteins need to be sorted and sent to their correct locations inside the cell to work properly. Most proteins are made in the nucleus but perform their tasks in specific areas. For example, mitochondria, which are the powerhouses of the cell, need to import a large number of different proteins to function correctly. These proteins have special signals that help them reach their right destination.
Mitochondrial Import Process
One important entry point for proteins into the mitochondria is a complex called the translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane, or TOM for short. This complex is made up of several parts. The main component is called TOM40, which forms a pore that lets proteins through. There are also other parts, like TOM22, which help recognize and bind proteins that need to be imported.
Two additional parts, TOM20 and TOM70, are important because they recognize different signals on the proteins. TOM20 mainly works with proteins meant for the inner mitochondrial membrane or the matrix. On the other hand, TOM70 prefers proteins that have a particular structure known as alpha-helical, which are typically intended for the outer or inner mitochondrial membrane.
TOM70 does not stay tightly connected to the core complex compared to TOM20. It usually appears as a homodimer, meaning it exists as two identical units. When TOM20 is broken apart, it still shows a strong presence in the complex, but it moves differently in tests that help visualize protein structures.
To help get proteins to these entry points, other helpers, called chaperones, are needed. These chaperones make sure that proteins do not stick together and can find their way to the TOM Complex.
While scientists generally believe that most proteins are imported into mitochondria after they are made, some evidence suggests that proteins might also be made right next to the mitochondria. This idea comes from noticing ribosomes, which are the sites of protein synthesis, around the mitochondria. Some experiments have even shown that certain messenger RNAs (MRNAs) are found near the mitochondria, hinting that proteins could be made on-site.
Role of RNA-Binding Proteins
RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are important players in this process. They can control where mRNAs go, how stable they are, and if they get translated into proteins. For instance, in yeast, one RBP called Puf3p helps guide mRNAs to the mitochondria. In mammals, two well-studied RBPs, CLUH and SYNJ2BP, help manage mRNAs that encode mitochondrial proteins.
When CLUH is removed, the amount of proteins made from its target mRNAs drops, leading to problems with the shape of mitochondria. Meanwhile, SYNJ2BP ensures that its target mRNAs stay in the right place, especially when translation is under stress. SYNJ2BP also plays a role in local translation, which helps keep mitochondrial function intact.
Study of TOM Complex Interactions
In an effort to better understand how TOMM20 and TOMM70 interact with other proteins, scientists used a method called APEX2 proximity labeling. This method helps identify what proteins are nearby and interacting with each other. By attaching a small tag to TOMM20 or TOMM70, they were able to pinpoint which proteins were specifically associated with each receptor.
They created two types of fusion proteins, TOMM20-APEX2 and TOMM70-APEX2, and introduced them into HeLa cells, which are commonly used in laboratory studies. They ensured that these proteins were correctly located in the mitochondria, confirming that their method was working as intended.
Functional Validation of Fusion Proteins
To make sure the fusion proteins were functioning correctly, the scientists used various methods. They looked for the presence of their tagged proteins in the mitochondria and assessed whether they caused any negative effects on mitochondrial function.
They found that both fusion proteins interacted with the key components of the TOM complex. Further tests showed that TOMM20-APEX2 was significantly present when pulled from the TOM complex, confirming that the fusion proteins were properly integrated.
Biotinylation Activity of Fusion Proteins
Next, the researchers tested whether these fusion proteins could perform biotinylation, a process where a small molecule called biotin is attached to proteins, marking them for identification. When both fusion proteins were expressed with specific conditions, they could label additional proteins, indicating that the fusion proteins were active.
Interestingly, the biotin labeling was not limited to just mitochondrial proteins; it also appeared to affect proteins in the surrounding cytoplasm. This result indicates that the fusion proteins may have some influence beyond their immediate area.
Analysis of Protein Interactions
With the fusion proteins confirmed to work, the scientists sought to analyze the interactions of TOMM20-APEX2 and TOMM70-APEX2 with other proteins. They compared the sets of proteins identified from different conditions, including controls where the fusion proteins were not expressed.
In total, they identified over 2,000 different proteins, with many of them associated with mitochondrial functions. The analysis revealed that there were substantial interactions with proteins from the cytoplasm and even some from the nucleus.
Interestingly, while TOMM20 was linked to many RBPs and proteins related to translation, TOMM70 primarily associated with membrane-bound organelles. This difference indicates that TOMM20 may play a more significant role in local translation processes compared to TOMM70.
Differential Interactions Under Translation Stress
To understand how the interactomes changed under conditions of translation stress, the scientists treated the cells with a translation inhibitor called puromycin. They found that despite the stress, many interactions remained, although some proteins were more abundant than others under these conditions.
When examining which proteins were more prevalent after translation inhibition, they identified several translation-related proteins. This suggests that TOMM20 may have a role in managing the stability of mRNAs during stressful times.
Conclusion
The work carried out provides insights into how TOMM20 and TOMM70 receptors manage different sets of proteins in the mitochondria. The study confirms that these receptors interact with unique but sometimes overlapping sets of mitochondrial preproteins, drawing parallels to their counterparts in yeast.
The findings also support the idea that TOMM20 is involved in local translation processes at the mitochondrial outer membrane. Understanding these interactions not only deepens knowledge about mitochondrial function but also may have implications for understanding how cells react to stress and maintain their health.
The research emphasizes the complexity of protein sorting and the vital role of mitochondria in cellular function, providing a foundation for future investigations into mitochondrial biology and its relevance to various diseases.
Methodology Overview
Cell Culture
The researchers maintained HeLa 11ht cells in a specific growth medium, following careful protocols to ensure healthy growth and accurate results during experiments.
Plasmid Construction
Using advanced techniques, they created plasmids that would allow for the integration of the fusion proteins into the HeLa cells. This step was crucial for ensuring the correct expression of TOMM20 and TOMM70.
Generation of Stable Cell Lines
To produce cell lines that consistently expressed the APEX2 fusion proteins, the scientists employed a method that ensures the integration of genes into the cell's DNA.
Immunofluorescence and Cell Fractionation
The team performed various laboratory techniques, including immunofluorescence microscopy, to visualize and confirm the localization of the fusion proteins. They also fractionated the cells to separate mitochondrial and cytoplasmic components for further analysis.
Proximity Labeling
By inducing biotinylation under controlled conditions, they were able to capture and analyze proteins that interacted close to the TOM complex. This methodology is essential for understanding the local environment around mitochondrial receptors.
Mass Spectrometry Analysis
Finally, the proteins captured through proximity labeling underwent sophisticated mass spectrometry analysis to determine their identities. This allowed for significant insights into which proteins were interacting with TOMM20 and TOMM70 in various cellular contexts.
This combination of techniques gives a comprehensive view of the intricate interactions at play in the mitochondrial import pathways, paving the way for further understanding of mitochondrial dynamics.
Title: Proximity labeling reveals differential interaction partners of the human mitochondrial import receptor proteins TOMM20 and TOMM70
Abstract: Import of most mitochondrial proteins requires that their precursor proteins are bound by the (peripheral) receptor proteins TOM20, TOM22, and TOM70. For budding yeast TOM20 and TOM70, there is evidence of specific yet overlapping substrate recognition, but no such data is available for metazoan cells. Using APEX2-based proximity labeling, we thus created association profiles for human TOMM20 and TOMM70 in HeLa cells. We particularly focused on their interaction with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) since there is evidence for RNA association with the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) and local translation at the mitochondrial surface, but these processes are poorly understood. Our results show a preferred association of several RBPs and translation factors with TOMM20 over TOMM70. These include SYNJBP2, a previously identified membrane-bound RBP that binds and protects mRNAs encoding mitochondrial proteins. Translational inhibition by puromycin resulted in an even increased association of these RBPs with TOMM20 compared to TOMM70, suggesting that TOMM20 but not TOMM70 might play a role in preserving cellular hemostasis during translation stress by retaining protective RBPs and translation-related proteins at the MOM.
Authors: Ralf-Peter Jansen, S. Akram, K. I. Zittlau, B. Macek
Last Update: 2024-10-31 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.25.620316
Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.25.620316.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.