Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology# Neuroscience

Decoding the Brain's Busy Work

This article explores how our brains filter and respond to information.

Ulysse Klatzmann, Sean Froudist-Walsh, Daniel P. Bliss, Panagiota Theodoni, Jorge Mejías, Meiqi Niu, Lucija Rapan, Daniel S. Margulies, Nicola Palomero-Gallagher, Claire Sergent, Stanislas Dehaene, Xiao-Jing Wang

― 7 min read


Brain Activity UnraveledBrain Activity Unraveledstimuli.Exploring how we notice and respond to
Table of Contents

Every moment, our brains are bombarded with countless bits of information from our surroundings. Imagine walking down the street while trying to listen to music, see cars, and smell the food from nearby stalls. But even though our senses pick up a lot of data, only a small part of it actually makes it into our conscious thoughts. It’s like being at a huge buffet; you can see everything, but you only pick a few dishes to actually taste.

The Mystery of Consciousness

Scientists have long debated how our brains decide what to focus on consciously. There are many theories, but it’s a complex puzzle. Some researchers think that certain Connections between brain cells help us notice things. When an object is detected, a flurry of brain Activity starts, kind of like fireworks going off to signal, “Hey, look at this!”

But here’s the twist: even if you didn’t consciously notice something, the brain can still be active. Your senses may react to weak signals without you even realizing it. So, just because something is happening in the background of your brain doesn’t mean you’re paying attention to it.

What Happens When We Spot Something?

When you do notice something, like a flashing light, your brain goes through a series of changes. Initially, there’s a quick response in the area of your brain that processes what you see. Then, after about 200 milliseconds, there’s a more intense burst of activity in other parts of the brain, such as the prefrontal cortex. This is where decisions are made, and actions are planned.

During these moments, the brain communicates across different areas. It’s like a well-coordinated team effort where some players handle the initial signal, while others get ready to react, ensuring that you know what’s happening around you.

The Role of Different Brain Cells

At the heart of how we notice things are two types of brain connections: fast-acting connections and slower ones. Fast connections, like AMPA Receptors, help quickly transmit information, while slower connections, like NMDA Receptors, help keep activity going longer. When the brain receives strong signals, both types work together, kind of like a relay race where the baton is passed smoothly between runners.

Interestingly, certain connections in the brain are more dominant in specific areas. For instance, feedforward connections that bring information forward to higher brain areas tend to favor the fast-acting receptors. But connections that send information back rely more on the slower receptors. This division of labor helps the brain respond quickly while also maintaining a longer-lasting awareness of important information.

The Experiment

To study these ideas, scientists created a model of the monkey’s brain, simulating how it reacts to different Stimuli. They programmed different levels of activity depending on how strong or weak a stimulus was. This model tried to emulate how monkeys behave when they try to notice and respond to signals, like a light flashing on or off.

In this model, the researchers presented flashes of light and looked at how the brain reacted. They found that when monkeys successfully detected light, there was a widespread burst of activity throughout the brain, especially in regions responsible for planning and decision-making. But when they missed it, the response was much weaker.

The Pattern of Response

When looking at this response, it became clear that the amount of light presented played a big role in whether the monkey noticed it. As the brightness increased, the likelihood of detection grew steadily, creating a pattern similar to a rollercoaster ride-slowly climbing before a thrilling drop!

There were two distinct types of responses-early and late. Early responses showed a steady increase in activity, whether or not the light was noticed. However, after a while, the pattern changed. A strong light often resulted in a second wave of activity, indicating that the stimulus had been detected.

Two Types of Activity

Scientists coined these two activity types as "unimodal" and "bimodal." In simple terms, unimodal means a single type of response (like everyone in a room laughing at the same joke), while bimodal refers to two different types of responses (some people laughing, others staying quiet). The early response to the light was unimodal, while the later response could swing either way, depending on whether the signal was spotted.

This dynamic change in response demonstrated how the brain switches between different states as it processes information. It’s like a light switch that turns on when you notice something and flickers off when you miss it.

Following the Signals

Using their model, researchers explored how the brain classifies information over time. They trained a smart program to pick up patterns in brain activity to see if it could tell when the monkeys successfully detected the light. The program did well in identifying the different stages of activity, showing that even in the noise of brain activity, there are clear signals of detection.

During the early part of the trial, patterns were changing rapidly, but by the end, there were consistent signals indicating a decision was made regarding the stimulus. This shows how our brains update their understanding of incoming information as we interact with our environment.

What Makes Us Notice?

Researchers also tried to uncover the reasons behind the different kinds of responses. They hypothesized that variations in brain connections-especially those involving NMDA and AMPA receptors-played crucial roles. Strong connections that favor AMPA are good for sending quick signals, while those that rely on NMDA are better for keeping the information alive longer.

As they adjusted these connections in their model, they realized that having the right mix of fast and slow connections was essential for detecting stimuli. If there were too many NMDA receptors, it could lead to too much excitement, resulting in chaotic signals rather than organized responses.

The Hierarchy of the Brain

An interesting finding of this research was the observation of how NMDA and AMPA receptors are distributed differently throughout the brain, particularly in higher areas of processing. The model suggested that as you move up the hierarchy of brain regions (from sensory areas to decision-making areas), the NMDA fraction actually decreases.

This means that while higher areas need some NMDA for sustained activity, they also require a strong AMPA presence to keep things flowing smoothly. It’s like a well-tuned orchestra-each section has its role, and the right balance creates harmony.

Making Sense of It All

What does all this really mean? The findings provide insights into how our brains pick up on important signals and how various connections help facilitate conscious awareness. The blend of fast and slower connections appears to be crucial for ensuring we can respond quickly and effectively to stimuli in our environment.

This model helps tie together various threads in our understanding of consciousness-how signals reach the forefront of our awareness and how they might influence our decisions.

Implications for the Future

As researchers dive deeper into understanding how the brain processes information, this model opens the door to many exciting possibilities. Future studies can explore more complex tasks, such as how we respond to social cues or unexpected events.

The hope is that by gaining a better understanding of these dynamics, scientists can uncover the mechanisms behind various cognitive functions, ultimately leading to advancements in how we think about consciousness and awareness.

Conclusion

In summary, our brains are like busy offices with lots of workers trying to process information. Some signals are noticed, while others are ignored, depending on various factors like the strength of the signal and the connectivity of the brain cells.

By creating models and conducting simulations, researchers can peek into the inner workings of the brain, revealing how we become aware of the world around us. The more we learn, the better we can appreciate the remarkable complexity of our minds!

Original Source

Title: A MESOSCALE CONNECTOME-BASED MODEL OF CONSCIOUS ACCESS IN THE MACAQUE MONKEY

Abstract: A growing body of evidence suggests that conscious perception of a sensory stimulus coincides with all-or-none activity across multiple cortical areas, a phenomenon called ignition. In contrast, the same stimulus, when undetected, induces only transient activity. In this work, we report a large-scale model of the macaque cortex based on recently quantified structural mesoscopic connectome data. We use this model to simulate a detection task, and demonstrate how a dynamical bifurcation mechanism produces ignition-like events in the model network. The model predicts that feedforward excitatory transmission is primarily mediated by the fast AMPA receptors to ensure rapid signal propagation from sensory to associative areas. In contrast, a greater proportion of the inter-areal feedback projections and local recurrent excitation depend on the slow NMDA receptors, to ensure ignition of distributed frontoparietal activity. Our model predicts, counterintuitively, that fast-responding sensory areas contain a higher ratio of NMDA to AMPA receptors compared to association cortical areas that show slow, sustained activity. We validate this prediction using cortex-wide in-vitro receptor autoradiography data. Finally, we show how this model can account for various behavioral and physiological effects linked to consciousness. Together, these findings clarify the neurophysiological mechanisms of conscious access in the primate cortex and support the concept that gradients of receptor densities along the cortical hierarchy contribute to distributed cognitive functions.

Authors: Ulysse Klatzmann, Sean Froudist-Walsh, Daniel P. Bliss, Panagiota Theodoni, Jorge Mejías, Meiqi Niu, Lucija Rapan, Daniel S. Margulies, Nicola Palomero-Gallagher, Claire Sergent, Stanislas Dehaene, Xiao-Jing Wang

Last Update: 2024-10-31 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.20.481230

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.20.481230.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles