Challenges in Treating Mycobacterial Infections
Research highlights the complexities of persister cells in mycobacterial infections.
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
- Understanding Persister Cells
- Study Focus: Mycobacterial Pathogens
- Current Research on Mycobacterium abscessus
- Starvation-Induced Persister Cells
- Identifying Key Pathways in M. abscessus
- Validating Findings with Gene Deletions
- Investigating ROS in Antibiotic Death
- Clinical Implications
- Conclusion
- Original Source
Antibiotics are medications used to kill bacteria or stop them from growing. The main goal of using antibiotics is to get rid of harmful bacteria that cause infections. Many common infections respond well to antibiotics, and patients often recover after one to two weeks of treatment. However, some infections are more difficult to treat, requiring much longer courses of antibiotics, sometimes lasting months or even years. Mycobacterial infections, such as those caused by tuberculosis, are a good example of this challenge. The treatment for these infections is lengthy to avoid relapse.
One reason mycobacteria are hard to kill with antibiotics is a phenomenon called "persistence." Some bacterial cells, known as persisters, manage to survive even when antibiotics are present. Research from the 1940s showed that while most bacteria die quickly when exposed to antibiotics like penicillin, a small group of Persister Cells can live for much longer. These persister cells are not resistant to antibiotics and do not multiply when the antibiotic is present; instead, they enter a special state that allows them to survive temporarily.
Most bacteria can form persister cells, and this mechanism often kicks in during stressful situations, like when nutrients are scarce or when the environment becomes more acidic. Interestingly, these stresses are also found in areas of the body where the immune system fights infections. This means that sometimes the immune system may make it harder for antibiotics to clear bacterial infections.
Understanding Persister Cells
Persister cells have been studied a lot in a common lab bacterium called Escherichia coli. Researchers have found various ways these cells are formed. Some important systems that help in forming persisters include specific proteins that manage how the bacteria grow and divide. However, there is still much we don’t know about how these processes work. For example, it’s unclear how stress triggers the formation of persister cells and how these cells stay alive when key processes are halted by antibiotics.
Even the way bacteria die after antibiotic exposure is not completely understood. Traditionally, it was believed that antibiotics kill bacteria by stopping their key functions. For example, certain antibiotics destroy the cell wall, causing the bacteria to burst. However, some studies suggest that other factors, like the buildup of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), might also play a role in killing bacteria. Yet, other research hasn’t found a connection between ROS and antibiotic-induced death, leading to uncertainty in this area.
Study Focus: Mycobacterial Pathogens
Studying persister cells in mycobacterial bacteria offers some advantages. Mycobacterial persister cells can survive a very long time when exposed to antibiotics. For example, the bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis requires long treatment periods, often lasting four months or more, while non-tuberculous mycobacteria can need treatment for a year and a half with high relapse rates. Some species, like Mycobacterium abscessus, present even more challenges due to inherent resistance to many antibiotics, resulting in the use of medications that are more harmful to patients and often requiring much longer treatment durations.
Previous studies have looked at how mycobacteria respond to antibiotics, some focusing on how bacteria can inherit resistance while others examine how persister cells form. Techniques like transposon mutagenesis and CRISPR have helped researchers discover important genes related to antibiotic responses. These studies highlighted the role of the bacterial cell membrane in controlling how well antibiotics can penetrate the bacteria.
However, studying persister cells has proven difficult due to the widespread cell death during experiments. This can mask the effects of certain mutations. One successful study focused on the antibiotic rifampin and identified many mutations related to persister cells. However, it’s unclear if these patterns apply to other antibiotics or bacteria.
Current Research on Mycobacterium abscessus
In this research, the process of forming persister cells in M. abscessus was studied to find genes required for both spontaneous and starvation-induced persister cell formation. Using a comprehensive genetic screen, several pathways linked to persister cell survival were identified. One of the key findings was that a specific enzyme called KatG helps bacteria survive when exposed to certain antibiotics, indicating that ROS are indeed factors in bacterial death.
Starvation-Induced Persister Cells
To better understand Antibiotic Resistance, the researchers first needed suitable conditions for studying mycobacteria. Genetic screens face challenges, such as high cell death rates that can obscure results and the possibility of spontaneous drug-resistant mutants emerging. To tackle these problems, they created high-density culture conditions that maintained antibiotic effectiveness.
They tested several antibiotics used for treating M. abscessus infections, including tigecycline and linezolid, as well as those used for tuberculosis treatment, like rifampin and isoniazid. The researchers discovered that in nutrient-poor conditions (starvation), the number of persister cells increased significantly compared to well-nourished cultures. This trend was observed across multiple mycobacterial species, indicating that starvation is a common trigger for persister formation.
Identifying Key Pathways in M. abscessus
Using these conditions, the researchers conducted a transposon mutagenesis screen to identify genes essential for persister cell formation in response to antibiotics. They worked with thousands of mutations to see which genes contributed to survival during antibiotic treatment. They found hundreds of genes linked to creating persister cells, some of which were already known to play roles in antibiotic response.
Interestingly, although the bacteria were treated with translation-inhibiting antibiotics, several genes related to combating oxidative stress were also necessary for survival. This included genes linked to managing ROS. The study suggested that when bacteria are exposed to antibiotics, they may accumulate ROS, leading to cell damage and death.
Validating Findings with Gene Deletions
To confirm the role of specific genes like KatG and others identified in the screen, researchers created mutant strains that lacked these genes. They tested these mutants to see how well they could survive antibiotic exposure. The mutants lacking KatG showed significant defects in persister cell formation, reinforcing the idea that this enzyme plays a vital role in survival.
Investigating ROS in Antibiotic Death
Since the studies indicated that KatG helps manage ROS, the researchers delved deeper to see if these toxic molecules contributed to bacterial cell death. They used specific dyes to detect ROS levels in the bacterial cells. The results showed that when bacteria were stressed with antibiotics, the levels of ROS increased dramatically.
To further investigate, the researchers tried growing the bacteria under low-oxygen (hypoxic) conditions to reduce ROS production. They found that under these conditions, the bacteria survived better, suggesting that ROS accumulation contributes to the lethality of certain antibiotics.
Clinical Implications
The findings from this research have important implications for treating infections caused by mycobacteria. Given the high relapse rates associated with treating M. abscessus, the study highlights potential new strategies that could target the unique features of persister cells. This approach might involve using drugs that do not directly kill bacteria but instead focus on reducing the survival of these persisters.
Conclusion
In summary, this research sheds light on the complex behaviors of mycobacterial infections and how they respond to antibiotics. It underscores the importance of factors like starvation and oxidative stress in influencing bacterial survival. By understanding the mechanisms of persister cell formation and the roles of specific genes and ROS, new therapeutic strategies can be developed to combat these challenging infections effectively.
Title: Reactive Oxygen Detoxification Contributes to Mycobacterium abscessus Antibiotic Survival
Abstract: When a population of bacteria encounter a bactericidal antibiotic most cells die rapidly. However, a sub-population, known as "persister cells", can survive for prolonged periods in a non-growing, but viable, state. Persister cell frequency is dramatically increased by stresses such as nutrient deprivation, but it is unclear what pathways are required to maintain viability, and how this process is regulated. To identify the genetic determinants of antibiotic persistence in mycobacteria, we carried out transposon mutagenesis high-throughput sequencing (Tn-Seq) screens in Mycobacterium abscessus (Mabs). This analysis identified genes essential in both spontaneous and stress-induced persister cells, allowing the first genetic comparison of these states in mycobacteria, and unexpectedly identified multiple genes involved in the detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS). We found that endogenous ROS were generated following antibiotic exposure, and that the KatG catalase-peroxidase contributed to survival in both spontaneous and starvation-induced persisters. We also found that that hypoxia significantly impaired bacterial killing, and notably, in the absence of oxygen, KatG became dispensable. Thus, the lethality of some antibiotics is amplified by toxic ROS accumulation, and persister cells depend on detoxification systems to remain viable.
Authors: Bennett H Penn, N. A. Bates, R. Rodriguez, R. Drwich, A. Ray, S. A. Stanley
Last Update: Oct 31, 2024
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.13.618103
Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.13.618103.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.