Monitoring Wildlife in Australia’s Freshwater Ecosystems
eDNA methods show promise for tracking the health of freshwater habitats in Australia.
Brock Adam Hedges, Perry G Beasley-Hall, Tina E Berry, Kathryn L Dawkins, Andrew D Austin, Philip Weinstein, Michelle T Guzik
― 8 min read
Table of Contents
- Drought and Its Impact on Australia
- Concerns About Australia’s Unique Wildlife
- Invasive Species and Their Role
- The Challenges of Monitoring Wildlife
- The Study at Hiltaba Nature Reserve
- Study Site Description
- Conducting the eDNA Sampling
- Results of eDNA Analysis
- Community Variation in Species Detection
- The Importance of Dealing with Invasive Species
- The Value of eDNA as a Monitoring Tool
- Future Directions for Research
- Conclusion
- Original Source
Freshwater habitats, like rivers and lakes, are facing serious trouble across the world. These areas are becoming less and less healthy, especially in regions that are already dry. People are causing a lot of this damage through pollution, changing how land is used, and the effects of climate change. This is especially critical in places where fresh water is already hard to find, making these environments more sensitive to changes. Small bodies of water in these areas often dry up now and then because they depend on rainfall.
Even though some areas might recover or slow down losses, fixing these problems requires many people working together, from local communities to countries around the globe. It’s important to keep an eye on how plants and animals that depend on these habitats are doing so that we can make better decisions about how to help them.
Drought and Its Impact on Australia
In Australia, droughts are becoming more common and severe because of climate change. It’s expected to get worse, regardless of how much pollution we produce. Freshwater habitats are particularly affected because they depend on temperature and water levels. In Australia’s dry areas, programs to monitor wildlife are quite rare and often have little data about the animals that are disappearing.
Accessing these remote areas is tough, and there’s often not enough funding to support Monitoring efforts. That’s why we need new, cost-effective tools that can help us assess the health of freshwater ecosystems and gather data on wildlife that relies on these important resources.
Concerns About Australia’s Unique Wildlife
Australia is home to many unique animals, and their safety is becoming a serious concern. Since European colonization, the country has faced a crisis with native mammal extinctions, losing more than ten percent of its species in the last 200 years. One-third of all mammal extinctions since 1500 occurred here. The disappearance of smaller mammals has shrunk specific animal groups, especially those that are native to dry areas. Most of these loses come from medium-sized animals that weigh between 0.035 and 5.5 kg.
This decline in mammals has also affected important services provided by nature, such as soil turnover from burrowing animals and natural pest control from marsupials. Birds are not doing well either, with several extinctions recorded since colonization, and more are expected in the next 20 years. Reptiles are also at risk, but we don’t know as much about their situation due to a lack of data. There is increasing worry that extinction cases will rise in the next century.
Invasive Species and Their Role
Invasive predators, like feral cats and foxes, are often blamed for the decline of small mammals in Australia. Other issues, such as environmental changes and disease, are also causing problems. Additionally, changes in habitats and climate are impacting birds and reptiles. Global efforts to protect wildlife are not enough, but there have been some successful projects in Australia. For instance, fenced areas have helped boost the survival rates of endangered species in specific regions.
Researchers are trying to understand the changes in mammal populations, including both native and invasive species, to help manage these populations effectively, especially as climate change continues to impact them. Currently, monitoring efforts often focus on individual species rather than entire communities, leaving gaps in our understanding.
The Challenges of Monitoring Wildlife
Monitoring wildlife can be tricky. Methods used can be biased and inconsistent. There’s a need for standardized techniques that can be used across different habitats. One promising solution is environmental DNA (EDNA) metabarcoding. This method allows scientists to analyze a sample of water and detect multiple species of animals from it.
In simple terms, eDNA is like a fingerprint left behind by animals in the water. This technique can help identify the many different species living in an area and give a clear picture of the ecosystem's health. It works especially well in freshwater environments, helping find invasive species that could harm the ecosystem.
While many studies so far have focused on fish, amphibians, and small invertebrates, eDNA can also pick up signals from larger animals that visit the water. Some studies have shown that eDNA can detect more species than traditional wildlife surveys, which often rely on cameras or direct observations.
The Study at Hiltaba Nature Reserve
To see how effective eDNA is in monitoring wildlife, researchers focused on a special area in South Australia called Hiltaba Nature Reserve. This site is known for its unique granite rock-holes that collect fresh rainfall. These rock-holes are crucial for many animals, especially in a dry climate. The research aimed to see how well eDNA could detect vertebrate visitors compared to traditional methods like camera trapping, which involves using cameras to take pictures of animals visiting the area.
The researchers had four main goals:
- Test how well eDNA identifies native and invasive species visiting the rock-holes.
- Compare the effectiveness of eDNA with traditional camera traps.
- Investigate how the presence of different species varies over time and space.
- Provide advice for managing and conserving these important freshwater habitats.
Study Site Description
The Hiltaba Nature Reserve spans a large area and has been managed for conservation since 2012. It features granite hills with patches of woodland and grassland. The reserve is home to many plants and animals that have seen declines elsewhere, making it an important site for research.
The management team at Hiltaba has implemented several programs to improve Biodiversity, including reducing the number of non-native animals and protecting native species. With this in mind, the researchers selected Hiltaba as an ideal place for their study because of its ecological importance.
Conducting the eDNA Sampling
Researchers went to the rock-holes during several months in 2020 to collect water samples. They gathered water from various locations to ensure they got a good mix of different habitats. Special care was taken to prevent contamination while collecting samples.
Once the samples were collected, the team analyzed the water for eDNA using specific laboratory methods to extract and process the DNA. This involved several steps to ensure that they could identify the different species present in the samples.
Results of eDNA Analysis
The analysis of the eDNA samples revealed many unique vertebrate species, including mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians. The researchers found that eDNA was able to identify more than half of the species detected by camera trapping. They even discovered new species records that had not been previously identified through traditional methods.
Interestingly, they found that while many mammals were easily detected by both methods, birds and reptiles did not show the same level of agreement between eDNA and camera trapping. This means that some bird and reptile species might be better monitored using traditional methods or a combination of both approaches.
Community Variation in Species Detection
The researchers also examined how the animal communities changed over time. They noticed that the types of species visiting the rock-holes in different months varied. For instance, the communities in winter were more similar to each other than those in summer. The availability of fresh water influenced which animals showed up, with native species depending more heavily on these resources as time went on.
Different rock-holes attracted different groups of animals, likely due to factors like elevation and accessibility. Animals might avoid higher rock-holes because they are harder to reach. This variability highlights the importance of location and habitat features in monitoring efforts.
The Importance of Dealing with Invasive Species
The study also pointed out a concerning trend: invasive species were frequently found in the eDNA samples. This indicates that these animals are taking advantage of the fresh water found in the rock-holes. Their presence can negatively impact native species that rely on these resources.
To improve outcomes for native animals, it’s essential to manage the access of invasive species to the rock-holes. Limiting their use of these water sources can help restore balance and support native wildlife.
The Value of eDNA as a Monitoring Tool
Overall, the study confirmed that eDNA is a good tool for monitoring freshwater habitats and detecting vertebrate visitors. It performed well compared to traditional methods, offering a cost-effective and efficient way to assess wildlife. Gathering samples is straightforward, making it accessible for various stakeholders to participate in conservation efforts.
However, challenges remain, including ensuring high-quality reference libraries for better species identification. More research is needed to enhance the effectiveness of eDNA methods and improve understanding of how to monitor biodiversity in these crucial ecosystems.
Future Directions for Research
Looking ahead, researchers plan to continue exploring how eDNA can be used in different environments, especially in Australia’s dry areas. They aim to improve the quality of reference databases to better support their findings. Grouping eDNA results with traditional monitoring methods could lead to a better understanding of local wildlife populations.
As more is learned about the biology and behavior of different species, eDNA techniques can be refined to enhance their accuracy. Addressing these gaps will help protect Australia’s unique wildlife and support the health of its freshwater ecosystems.
Conclusion
In summary, freshwater ecosystems are in danger, but monitoring methods like eDNA offer hope for understanding and protecting these critical areas. By identifying both native and invasive species, researchers can help inform management strategies that will benefit the entire ecosystem. Working together, scientists and communities can champion for greater conservation efforts and improve the future of Australia's unique wildlife.
Title: Environmental DNA and wildlife camera traps uncover complimentary vertebrate visitation patterns at freshwater granite rock-holes
Abstract: Freshwater ecosystems are in decline globally. In Australia, threatening processes include invasive species, increasing drought frequency, climate change and changes to land use, all of which have been associated with declining vertebrate diversity, particularly in Australias arid interior. Efficient monitoring tools are required to effectively monitor and conserve freshwater ecosystems and their associated vertebrate communities. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is one tool that shows promise for monitoring these systems, but knowledge of how eDNA data compares to more established ecological assessment techniques is limited. To address this knowledge gap, we sampled vertebrate eDNA from seven freshwater water bodies of proposed conservation importance in the Australian arid-lands, at three timepoints to measure visitation and compare our findings to camera trapping data at the same locations. Using eDNA we detected 19 species of vertebrates, including native species (such as macropods, wombats and emus) and invasive species (such as feral goats, cats and foxes). In contrast, camera traps detected 32 species, and was much more successful at detecting bird visitation than eDNA. These communities varied both spatially between rock-holes, and temporally, with summer collection periods being distinct from winter-spring. Our results demonstrate the success of eDNA metabarcoding as a tool for monitoring vertebrate visitation to arid-lands freshwater ecosystems that is complementary to more traditional survey methods such as wildlife camera trapping. Finally, we provide conservation recommendations for these vertebrate communities and discuss the efficacy of eDNA for monitoring freshwater resources in arid-lands environments.
Authors: Brock Adam Hedges, Perry G Beasley-Hall, Tina E Berry, Kathryn L Dawkins, Andrew D Austin, Philip Weinstein, Michelle T Guzik
Last Update: 2024-11-03 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.31.621266
Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.31.621266.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.