The New Approach to Brain Intelligence Research
Researchers shift focus to brain connectivity for understanding intelligence.
Jonas A. Thiele, Joshua Faskowitz, Olaf Sporns, Kirsten Hilger
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
- What is Intelligence?
- Where’s the Intelligence in the Brain?
- Machine Learning and Intelligence
- Predicting Intelligence with Brain Connections
- How We Measured Intelligence
- Getting to Know Brain Connectivity
- What Tasks Helped Predict Intelligence Best?
- Different Brain Networks
- Brain Connections and Intelligence Theories
- The Most Relevant Connections for Predicting Intelligence
- Validation of Our Findings
- Wrapping Up
- Original Source
- Reference Links
In recent times, researchers studying how our brains work have changed their approach. Instead of looking at one thing at a time, they are now using smart computer techniques to predict behavior by analyzing different brain signals all at once. This change is like moving from using a simple map to using a GPS that takes into account multiple routes to get where you want to be.
What is Intelligence?
Intelligence is a tricky word. It refers to how smart someone is and can help predict important things like how well someone does in school, how healthy they are, and even how long they might live. Many ideas exist about what intelligence is and how it works. One famous idea is that people who do well on one test usually do well on others, suggesting there’s something common helping them out – this is called general intelligence.
Researchers have tried to break down intelligence into different types. For example, there’s Fluid Intelligence, which is about problem-solving and reasoning without relying on what you already know. Then, there’s crystallized intelligence, which is about using the knowledge you’ve picked up over time. It’s like the difference between figuring out a new puzzle and knowing the answers to trivia questions!
Where’s the Intelligence in the Brain?
Scientists have looked inside our heads to find out how intelligence shows up in the brain. They’ve found that there isn’t just one magic spot for intelligence. Instead, various areas of the brain work together, like a well-rehearsed choir performing a beautiful song.
Many studies point to networks in our brain that connect different regions. It’s kind of like a city where different neighborhoods must communicate for the whole area to function properly. So, intelligence seems to come from how well these areas work together.
Machine Learning and Intelligence
Machine learning, a fancy way of saying that computers can learn from data, is starting to help in figuring out how our brains predict intelligence. This technology can look at a lot of brain information and spot patterns that we might miss. Picture a detective with a magnifying glass examining tons of clues to solve a case!
While researchers have made strides, they have mostly focused on one aspect of intelligence-fluid intelligence. It’s like studying only one flavor of ice cream and ignoring the rest.
Predicting Intelligence with Brain Connections
In this study, we wanted to take a step back and explore how brain connections can predict various types of intelligence-general, fluid, and crystallized. We looked at the brain activity of 806 healthy adults while they were resting and doing different tasks. It’s like watching how a team plays together during practice and then in a real game!
We used complex techniques to assess how these brain connections relate to intelligence. At the end of the day, we wanted to see which brain connections mattered most for predicting how smart someone is.
How We Measured Intelligence
To get a clear picture of intelligence, we used various cognitive tests. It’s like mixing different paints to get the perfect color. We wanted to ensure that the way we measured intelligence was solid and reliable.
We found that intelligence types were related. If someone scored well on one test, they likely scored well on others too. Think of it as someone who can juggle picking up bowling while also taking a fun spin at hula hooping!
Getting to Know Brain Connectivity
We mapped out Functional Connectivity in the brain, which simply refers to how different parts of the brain communicate while doing various tasks. We had eight maps in total that represented different brain states during rest and tasks. Just imagine linking a series of dots to see the big picture!
The patterns we saw indicated that when people worked on certain tasks, their brains communicated in ways that could predict intelligence. Thus, not every task was equally helpful in understanding intelligence. Some tasks were like brilliant fireworks on the Fourth of July, while others were more like that sparkler that never quite gets going.
What Tasks Helped Predict Intelligence Best?
We noticed that certain tasks were better at predicting intelligence than others. For example, tasks that were more challenging and required more thinking power helped get better results than simpler ones. So, working memory and language tasks shined bright, while tasks that involved emotions didn’t perform as well.
Brain Networks
DifferentWhen we looked at how well intelligence could be predicted from various brain networks, some networks stood out. The default mode network and attention networks were top-notch in predicting intelligence. It’s like they were the dream team of brain networks!
However, some networks, like the somatomotor and limbic networks, didn’t perform as well in our predictions. They were more like the players who cheer from the sidelines!
Brain Connections and Intelligence Theories
We also looked at how brain connections proposed in different theories of intelligence helped predict intelligence. Some theories, like the multiple demand theory, did a fair job, but not as well as the full set of brain connections. It was like trying to build a house with only half of the tools-you could manage, but the results wouldn’t be as sturdy!
The Most Relevant Connections for Predicting Intelligence
To figure out which specific brain connections mattered most for predicting intelligence, we employed a technique that helped reveal the importance of each connection. We discovered that around 1000 connections are crucial for achieving top prediction performance. These vital connections paint a picture of how intelligence emerges from a distributed network across the brain.
Validation of Our Findings
To ensure our findings were reliable, we used a three-step process. First, we trained our prediction models using a main group and tested them on a separate lockbox sample. This is like using a secret training camp to prepare a team for a big game!
Then, we replicated our findings in an external sample. Although the results weren’t as strong as the main group, the patterns were still present, validating the significance of our predictions.
Wrapping Up
In conclusion, we learned that understanding intelligence requires more than just looking at one piece of the puzzle. We need to think about brain connectivity as a whole and how different networks and tasks contribute to our understanding of human intelligence.
Thus, the next time you ponder why some people seem to breeze through puzzles while others struggle, just remember-it may be all in how their brains are wired to connect and communicate! Who knew intelligence could be such a team player?
Stay curious, and perhaps pick up a book or take a new puzzle challenge-you might just boost your brain’s communication network!
Title: Choosing explanation over performance: Insights from machine learning-based prediction of human intelligence from brain connectivity
Abstract: A growing body of research predicts individual cognitive ability levels from brain characteristics including functional brain connectivity. The majority of this research achieves good prediction performance but provides limited insight into neurobiological processes underlying the predicted concepts. The insufficient identification of predictive characteristics may present an important factor critically contributing to this constraint. Here, we encourage to design predictive modelling studies with an emphasis on interpretability to enhance our conceptual understanding of human cognition. As an example, we investigated in a preregistered study which functional brain connections successfully predict general, crystallized, and fluid intelligence in a sample of 806 healthy adults (replication: N = 322). The choice of the predicted intelligence component as well as the task during which connectivity was measured proved crucial for better understanding intelligence at the neural level. Further, intelligence could be predicted not solely from one specific set of brain connections, but from various combinations of connections with system-wide locations. Such partially redundant, system-wide functional characteristics complement intelligence-relevant connectivity of brain regions proposed by established intelligence theories. In sum, our study showcases how future predictive studies on human cognition can enhance explanatory value by prioritizing a systematic evaluation of predictive characteristics over maximizing prediction performance. Significance StatementIntelligence represents a hallmark of human behavior, and a surge number of studies predicted individual scores from functional brain connectivity. However, actual understanding about its neural basis remains limited. We demonstrate how predictive modelling can be applied strategically to improve tracing predictive functional brain connections to enhance our understanding of intelligence. Our study unveils crucial findings about intelligence: differences in the neural code of distinct intelligence facets not detectable on a behavioral level and a brain-wide distribution of functional brain characteristics relevant to intelligence that extends those proposed by major intelligence theories. In a broader context, it offers a framework for future prediction studies that prioritize meaningful insights into the neural basis of complex human traits over predictive performance.
Authors: Jonas A. Thiele, Joshua Faskowitz, Olaf Sporns, Kirsten Hilger
Last Update: 2024-11-13 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.12.04.569974
Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.12.04.569974.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.