Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Physics# Fluid Dynamics

The Behavior of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide in Heating Processes

This study highlights the effects of heating direction on carbon dioxide flow and heat transfer.

Marko Draskic, Jerry Westerweel, Rene Pecnik

― 5 min read


Supercritical CO2:Supercritical CO2:Heating Effectscarbon dioxide flow and heat transfer.Study reveals heating direction impacts
Table of Contents

Carbon dioxide behaves differently under high pressure and temperature conditions, specifically when it is in a supercritical state. This means that it does not exist as a liquid or gas but can act like both. This unique state makes studying how carbon dioxide flows and transfers heat very important for various applications, especially in energy systems aimed at reducing carbon emissions.

The Importance of Buoyancy

When carbon dioxide is heated, its density changes. In a supercritical state, these changes can happen rapidly, especially near a certain temperature and pressure known as the pseudo-critical point. In these scenarios, buoyancy plays a significant role. Buoyancy is the upward force that fluids exert, and in flows of heated carbon dioxide, it can affect how heat is transferred and how turbulence develops.

Experimental Investigation

To understand the behavior of carbon dioxide in these conditions, experiments were conducted in specially designed channels. Carbon dioxide flowed continuously under controlled conditions while being heated either from the top or bottom. By using optical methods, researchers were able to visualize the flow and measure temperatures, allowing them to see how heat transfer changes under different heating methods.

Different Heating Configurations

When heating from the bottom, the flow of carbon dioxide becomes less stable and more turbulent. As warm carbon dioxide rises, it mixes more with the colder fluid above, leading to better heat transfer. This is because the warm, lighter carbon dioxide rises, while the cooler, denser fluid sinks.

Conversely, when heating from the top, the situation changes dramatically. In this case, the warmer carbon dioxide does not mix as effectively. Instead, it tends to stay near the top, creating a stable layer. This stable layer acts like a barrier, limiting the upward movement of warmer fluid and resulting in reduced heat transfer.

The Role of Density Variations

Density variations in carbon dioxide near the pseudo-critical temperature can lead to significant changes in how the fluid moves. When the heating is moderate, the flow can still be managed effectively. However, if the temperature difference becomes too great, it can lead to unstable behavior. In such a case, turbulence can either enhance the flow or suppress it, depending on how the heating is applied.

Observing Flow Patterns

To visualize the flow patterns, a technique called shadowgraphy was used. This method captures how light interacts with the density variations in the flowing carbon dioxide, creating images that reveal the flow structure. By analyzing these images, researchers can see how the flow changes over time and how turbulence develops under different heating conditions.

Measuring Heat Transfer

Heat transfer was quantitatively measured by analyzing the temperature of the channel walls. When the lower wall was heated, the temperature increase was relatively small due to the mixing caused by buoyancy. In contrast, when heating from the top, the temperature increase was significantly larger. The heat transfer rate was reduced because the hot fluid accumulated near the top, leading to less effective cooling of the wall.

The Impact of Temperature Gradients

The temperature gradients created by heating affect the buoyancy and overall flow. In the bottom-heating case, the temperature difference enhanced mixing, which improved heat transfer. In the top-heating case, the temperature difference led to a stronger stable layer, diminishing the mixing effect and ultimately reducing heat transfer.

Observing Turbulence

Turbulence in flows is essential for efficient heat transfer. Turbulent flows can mix the fluid more effectively, spreading heat throughout the system. The experiments showed that with bottom heating, turbulence increased, resulting in enhanced heat transfer. However, with top heating, the flow became more stable, leading to less turbulence and poorer heat transfer.

Analyzing Results

The findings from these experiments have vital implications for designing systems that utilize carbon dioxide under supercritical pressure. The results show that heating direction significantly influences how carbon dioxide behaves and, therefore, how efficiently heat can be managed. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for the development of better energy systems that can function sustainably.

Practical Applications

The insights gained from these experiments can assist in designing more efficient heat exchangers, which are essential components in many energy systems, including those utilizing renewable sources. By optimizing how carbon dioxide flows and transfers heat, these systems can operate more effectively, contributing to lower carbon emissions.

Future Research Directions

While the current study provides valuable insights, there remains a need for further research to fully understand the complex behavior of carbon dioxide under supercritical conditions. Future studies should explore how different configurations affect flow dynamics and heat transfer and consider various heating methods.

Conclusion

The study of carbon dioxide flows at supercritical pressures reveals the critical role of buoyancy in influencing flow behavior and heat transfer efficiency. By understanding how different heating methods affect the flow, we can improve the design of energy systems that are not only effective but also environmentally friendly. Further research into these phenomena will enhance our ability to utilize carbon dioxide in sustainable energy applications.

Original Source

Title: The stability of stratified horizontal flows of carbon dioxide at supercritical pressures

Abstract: Fluids at supercritical pressures exhibit large variations in density near the pseudo critical line, such that buoyancy plays a crucial role in their fluid dynamics. Here, we experimentally investigate heat transfer and turbulence in horizontal hydrodynamically developed channel flows of carbon dioxide at 88.5 bar and 32.6{\deg}C, heated at either the top or bottom surface to induce a strong vertical density gradient. In order to visualise the flow and evaluate its heat transfer, shadowgraphy is used concurrently with surface temperature measurements. With moderate heating, the flow is found to strongly stratify for both heating configurations, with bulk Richardson numbers Ri reaching up to 100. When the carbon dioxide is heated from the bottom upwards, the resulting unstably stratified flow is found to be dominated by the increasingly prevalent secondary motion of thermal plumes, enhancing vertical mixing and progressively improving heat transfer compared to a neutrally buoyant setting. Conversely, stable stratification, induced by heating from the top, suppresses the vertical motion leading to deteriorated heat transfer that becomes invariant to the Reynolds number. The optical results provide novel insights into the complex dynamics of the directionally dependent heat transfer in the near-pseudo-critical region. These insights contribute to the reliable design of heat exchangers with highly property-variant fluids, which are critical for the decarbonisation of power and industrial heat. However, the results also highlight the need for further progress in the development of experimental techniques to generate reliable reference data for a broader range of non-ideal supercritical conditions.

Authors: Marko Draskic, Jerry Westerweel, Rene Pecnik

Last Update: 2024-09-13 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.08804

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.08804

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles