Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Physics# Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

Observing Solar Flares: New Insights and Challenges

Recent advancements reveal the complexities of measuring solar flares accurately.

Harry J. Greatorex, Ryan O. Milligan, Ingolf E. Dammasch

― 6 min read


Solar Flares UnderSolar Flares UnderScrutinyflare measurements.New insights expose challenges in solar
Table of Contents

Solar flares, those sudden bursts of Energy on the Sun, release a lot of heat and light. One of the important types of light they emit is called Lyman-alpha. This light is crucial for understanding what’s happening in the solar atmosphere. Despite its significance, we haven’t always had a good handle on observing this type of emission during flares. Lately, that’s changed. Thanks to better equipment and more focused efforts, scientists can now observe these flares more clearly and regularly.

The Challenge of Different Instruments

Different instruments can sometimes give different readings. This can be a problem. If one tool says a flare is super bright and another says it’s just a flicker, we might end up with confusing results. This article looks at how three different solar flares, classified as M-class (which is a medium level of flare strength), were captured by various instruments.

We compared measurements taken by instruments from different missions, such as GOES and others, including PROBA2 and MAVEN. These comparisons looked at how much light was emitted, how bright it seemed in contrast to other light sources, the total energy produced, and how the timing of the emissions varied.

While some differences in measurement were small, significant variations were noted in the calculated brightness, excess light, and energy released. For instance, in some cases, the difference could be as much as five times. This is a big deal because it can change how we think about solar flares and their impact on the atmosphere around Earth.

What’s Lyman-alpha, Anyway?

Lyman-alpha is a specific wavelength of light emitted by hydrogen, which is the most common element in the universe. Think of it as a signature sound that hydrogen makes, like a loud "hello" from across the room. It’s 121.6 nanometers long, which is in the ultraviolet part of the spectrum, just beyond what our eyes can see.

In the past, observations of this light during flares were few and far between. Some early attempts included using instruments on space missions like the OSO-8 and Skylab. With the right technology, it became possible to track Lyman-alpha emissions more effectively over recent years.

A Closer Look at Solar Flares

When examining solar flares with instruments, it’s crucial to ensure they are all measuring the same thing. This study gathered information from different sources, focusing on how each instrument impacted the measurements.

For the study, data from three different M-class solar flares was collected. GOES satellites, PROBA2, and MAVEN were all used to capture this data. Each instrument has its own strengths and weaknesses, which can lead to different results in measurements.

Instruments Used

GOES Satellites

The Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES) are like the watchful birds in the sky, constantly keeping an eye on the Sun's activity. They are especially good at detecting X-rays and UV light. GOES-14, GOES-15, and GOES-16 have been central to observing solar activity, often doing so from a stable position above the Earth.

PROBA2/LYRA

The PROBA2 satellite carries the Large Yield Radiometer (LYRA), which captures light from solar flares. The LYRA is designed for measuring a variety of wavelengths, including those of Lyman-alpha. However, over time, some of its sensors have degraded, which can lead to inconsistent readings.

MAVEN

MAVEN, or the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution satellite, has instruments that monitor the Sun's light reaching Mars. MAVEN collects data that helps scientists understand not just the Sun, but also how solar activity affects Mars’ atmosphere.

SDO and ASO-S

The Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) and the Advanced Space-based Solar Observatory (ASO-S) are additional instruments used to monitor solar flares and their emissions. These instruments provide different data sets that can help clarify how solar flares behave.

Discrepancies and Their Effects

Despite the advancements, differences in readings between instruments persist. For example, the actual brightness of a flare can appear much higher or lower depending on whether the measurement comes from GOES or PROBA2. This can lead scientists to draw different conclusions about the energy produced and how these flares behave.

When scientists want to calculate the effects of solar flares on the Earth's atmosphere, these discrepancies can lead to significant misunderstandings. If one instrument says a flare emits a lot of energy and another says otherwise, it can skew the energy budgets for our solar system.

Timing is Everything

Timing is also crucial. Flares can emit energy in waves, and if instruments don’t sync up perfectly, they may record the same flare differently in terms of time. That lag can alter how scientists interpret the sequence of events during a flare.

For instance, one instrument might detect the peak energy of a flare a few seconds earlier or later than another. While that might not seem like much, in the fast-paced world of solar physics, it can matter.

Key Findings

After comparing data from different instruments, several key points emerged:

  1. Relative Flux: The overall brightness of a flare is generally consistent across different instruments. This means that scientists can have more confidence in those measurements.

  2. Contrast and Excess Flux: The differences in measurements of how bright a flare appears against the background light can vary wildly. This can have serious implications for how scientists understand solar activity and its impact.

  3. Energy Calculations: The energy emitted by flares can be estimated differently based on which instrument is used. This can lead to vastly different estimates about how much energy is contributed to the solar environment.

  4. Timing of Emissions: Data from different instruments showed reasonable consistency in the timing of flare emissions. This suggests that timing differences are not as problematic as brightness differences.

The Bigger Picture

So why does all this matter? Understanding solar flares is important for predicting how they might affect Earth. Solar flares can disrupt satellite communications, impact power grids, and even affect astronauts in space. The more accurately we can measure and predict these flares, the better we can prepare for their effects.

In summary, while advances in technology have helped us observe solar flares more effectively, there are still challenges to overcome. The differences between various instruments illustrate the importance of careful data interpretation.

Looking Ahead

As we move forward with new missions and technologies, it will be crucial to standardize how we collect and analyze flare data. This could lead to improved methods for understanding solar activity, ultimately benefiting our ability to predict its effects on our planet.

With upcoming missions designed to monitor the Sun more closely, we may finally get a clearer picture of solar flares and their mysterious ways. After all, just like trying to get a read on your friend’s mood, getting a handle on solar flares can be tricky but certainly rewarding!

Conclusion

In the realm of solar physics, understanding discrepancies in flare observations is a work in progress. As we learn more about these celestial phenomena, we’ll continue to refine our techniques, improve our observations, and deepen our understanding of the Sun and its impact on our solar system. The journey, like observing a solar flare itself, may be bright and dynamic, and certainly full of surprises!

Original Source

Title: On the Instrumental Discrepancies in Lyman-alpha Observations of Solar Flares

Abstract: Despite the energetic significance of Lyman-alpha (Ly{\alpha}; 1216\AA) emission from solar flares, regular observations of flare related Ly{\alpha} have been relatively scarce until recently. Advances in instrumental capabilities and a shift in focus over previous Solar Cycles mean it is now routinely possible to take regular co-observations of Ly{\alpha} emission in solar flares. Thus, it is valuable to examine how the instruments selected for flare observations may influence the conclusions drawn from the analysis of their unique measurements. Here, we examine three M-class flares each observed in Ly{\alpha} by GOES-14/EUVS-E, GOES-15/EUVS-E, or GOES-16/EXIS-EUVS-B, and at least one other instrument from PROBA2/LYRA, MAVEN/EUVM, ASO-S/LST-SDI, and SDO/EVE-MEGS-P. For each flare, the relative and excess flux, contrast, total energy, and timings of the Ly{\alpha} emission were compared between instruments. It was found that while the discrepancies in measurements of the relative flux between instruments may be considered minimal, the calculated contrasts, excess fluxes, and energetics may differ significantly - in some cases up to a factor of five. This may have a notable impact on multi instrument investigations of the variable Ly{\alpha} emission in solar flares and estimates of the contribution of Ly{\alpha} to the radiated energy budget of the chromosphere. The findings presented in this study will act as a guide for the interpretation of observations of flare-related Ly{\alpha} from upcoming instruments during future Solar Cycles and inform conclusions drawn from multi-instrument studies.

Authors: Harry J. Greatorex, Ryan O. Milligan, Ingolf E. Dammasch

Last Update: 2024-11-01 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00736

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.00736

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles