Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Physics # Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

Using Neural Networks to Study Dark Energy Models

Neural networks help differentiate models of dark energy in the universe.

L. W. K. Goh, I. Ocampo, S. Nesseris, V. Pettorino

― 5 min read


Neural Networks and Dark Neural Networks and Dark Energy dark energy models of the universe. Neural networks reveal insights into
Table of Contents

In recent years, scientists have been like detectives, trying to figure out what makes our universe tick. One of the biggest puzzles they've encountered is Dark Energy, which is not easy to see, but we know it’s there because it seems to be pushing the universe to expand faster and faster. Think of it as an invisible force that keeps pushing everything apart, making it a challenging topic to study.

Now, imagine if we had a super-smart assistant to help us. That's where Neural Networks (NNs) come into play! They're like brainy sidekicks that can help analyze all kinds of data. In this case, we’re using them to try and tell the difference between two Models of our universe: a classic one with a cosmological constant (like a lazy couch potato) and a more dynamic model where dark energy interacts with Dark Matter (like a buddy-buddy system).

What’s the Plan?

We set out to see if these neural networks could help us identify which model fits the data better by analyzing how structures in the universe grow over time. So, give them the right dataset, and they’ll try to tell the difference between these two COSMIC recipes.

To cook up this dataset, we simulated the growth of galaxies and their structures based on both models. Think of it as creating two different flavors of ice cream and then seeing which one people prefer.

Training the Neural Network

Once we had our data all set, it was time to put the neural networks to work. Here’s where it gets fun! We created a neural network classifier that can distinguish between the two cosmic models.

First, we trained our network using some data that we generated to mimic real-life galaxy surveys. We gave it lots of examples so it could learn the differences. It’s like teaching a toddler the difference between apples and oranges-lots of examples help it figure things out!

Then, we let the network do its thing and measure how well it learned. We tweaked its settings to make sure it wasn't just memorizing but actually learning the underlying patterns. After all, we want it to be smart, not just a parrot!

The Results of Our Cosmic Experiment

After doing some fancy training, we tested our neural networks. We found that when it comes to only one type of coupling between dark matter and dark energy being active, the network could pretty much tell which model was which. It was like a cosmic game of "Guess Who?" and our network was nailing it!

In the case where dark energy was activated at lower redshifts, it could tell the difference with impressive accuracy. Even when we mixed things up a bit, switching on couplings at higher redshifts, it still did a decent job. Think of it as spotting a friend in a crowd, even if they changed their outfit!

Going Multi-Class: The Challenge

Now, we decided to throw a curveball-what if we mixed the models together? This makes things trickier, like trying to figure out if a smoothie contains strawberries, bananas, or both! The neural network had to not only recognize our classic model but also differentiate between the various types of dark energy models.

We stepped up our game by adding more layers to our neural network, allowing it to handle the increased complexity. With some more training and adjustments, the neural network began to see the patterns more clearly. However, it still struggled a bit when couplings were really close together-imagine trying to tell identical twins apart!

How Did We Measure Success?

To see how well our neural networks were doing, we used something called accuracy and loss curves. They’re like report cards showing how well the network is learning. High accuracy and low loss are what we want-like getting an A in school!

In our tests, the network was often scoring high marks for identifying the classic model but had a bit of a harder time with the more complicated dark energy models. It was clear that while our neural network was smart, there were still challenges ahead.

The Importance of More Data

In our cosmic adventure, we discovered something important: the more data, the better! As we fed the neural network more training samples, it became even more capable. However, there is a point where throwing more data at it doesn’t significantly improve its learning. Kind of like trying to teach a cat to fetch-it might just not be interested no matter how many treats you offer!

Learning from Mistakes

We also had to look out for randomness in our training. You see, neural networks can be sensitive to changes, so we made sure to test them multiple times under different conditions. It was like giving our neural network a pop quiz to see how well it really learned.

In the end, our network performed reliably, showing that it could handle different random seeds well. This means we can trust the network's findings!

Final Thoughts: What’s Next?

Our journey into the cosmos with neural networks has been quite a ride. We learned that these smart tools can help us differentiate between complex models of the universe and give us insights into dark energy.

As we look to the future, new and better data will likely lead us to a deeper understanding of the cosmic mysteries we’re working on. And who knows? Maybe one day, we’ll figure out what dark energy is really up to, all thanks to some clever neural networks and a bit of cosmic sleuthing.

So, buckle up-because the universe still has many secrets to reveal, and with a little tech magic, we’re getting closer to uncovering them!

Original Source

Title: Distinguishing Coupled Dark Energy Models with Neural Networks

Abstract: We investigate whether neural networks (NNs) can accurately differentiate between growth-rate data of the large-scale structure (LSS) of the Universe simulated via two models: a cosmological constant and $\Lambda$ cold dark matter (CDM) model and a tomographic coupled dark energy (CDE) model. We built an NN classifier and tested its accuracy in distinguishing between cosmological models. For our dataset, we generated $f\sigma_8(z)$ growth-rate observables that simulate a realistic Stage IV galaxy survey-like setup for both $\Lambda$CDM and a tomographic CDE model for various values of the model parameters. We then optimised and trained our NN with \texttt{Optuna}, aiming to avoid overfitting and to maximise the accuracy of the trained model. We conducted our analysis for both a binary classification, comparing between $\Lambda$CDM and a CDE model where only one tomographic coupling bin is activated, and a multi-class classification scenario where all the models are combined. For the case of binary classification, we find that our NN can confidently (with $>86\%$ accuracy) detect non-zero values of the tomographic coupling regardless of the redshift range at which coupling is activated and, at a $100\%$ confidence level, detect the $\Lambda$CDM model. For the multi-class classification task, we find that the NN performs adequately well at distinguishing $\Lambda$CDM, a CDE model with low-redshift coupling, and a model with high-redshift coupling, with 99\%, 79\%, and 84\% accuracy, respectively. By leveraging the power of machine learning, our pipeline can be a useful tool for analysing growth-rate data and maximising the potential of current surveys to probe for deviations from general relativity.

Authors: L. W. K. Goh, I. Ocampo, S. Nesseris, V. Pettorino

Last Update: Nov 17, 2024

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04058

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.04058

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles