Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology # Biochemistry

The Enigma of Life's Handedness

Exploring the dominance of left-handedness in life's building blocks.

Shannon Kim, Marco Todisco, Aleksandar Radakovic, Jack W. Szostak

― 7 min read


Life's Left-Handed Life's Left-Handed Mystery left-handed molecules in biology. Examining the preference for
Table of Contents

In the world of living creatures, there’s an unusual rule that governs the building blocks of life. You see, all our DNA is made up of D-nucleotides, and all proteins are made from L-amino Acids. It's like everyone decided to use only left shoes for a dance party, leaving the right ones behind! This strange consistency raises questions about how life started and why it picked one flavor over the other.

What’s the Deal with Left and Right?

In chemistry, things can come in two shapes: left-handed and right-handed forms called enantiomers. Imagine a pair of gloves, one for the left hand and the other for the right. They look similar but can’t fit onto either hand. In living organisms, D-nucleotides and L-amino acids are the enantiomers of nucleic acids and proteins, which are crucial for life.

The early days of life had to get it right from the start-mixing these two types would be like trying to fit a left glove on a right hand. Studies show that if you mix D and L versions, the essential reactions needed for life go all haywire. The copying of nucleic acids falls apart, and no one likes a party with broken dance moves.

The Chicken and the Egg of Life: Which Came First?

The question remains: did we get D-nucleotides before L-amino acids, or vice versa? Some scientists think that once RNA (the middleman between DNA and proteins) got its D-nucleotides sorted, it influenced the selection of L-amino acids for proteins. It’s like RNA was the trendsetter of life, deciding that L-amino acids were the way to go.

But here’s the twist: if RNA had a hand in picking L-amino acids, what about other biological molecules like lipids? Could they have established their handiness independently? It’s a bit like figuring out if the chicken or the egg created that delicious omelet!

The Spinning Wheel of Homochirality

Researchers have spent a lot of time trying to crack the mystery of why life is left-handed. Some interesting reactions that can create this left-handedness include the Soai reaction and Viedma ripening, which sound like the names of fancy cocktails. Although these reactions show promising results in creating homochiral substances, they haven’t yet produced essential compounds that could kickstart life.

A recent idea involves using a lucky magnet to help separate enantiomers. Scientists have shown that you can use magnetically polarized surfaces to get L- and D-amino acids apart, which sounds like magic but is very scientific. This method has had better luck with nucleotides than amino acids. If we can get D-nucleotides to organize well, they could lead directly to the formation of RNA and DNA, helping life along its merry way.

RNA's Role as the Trendsetter

Sticking to the tradition, researchers have observed that D-RNA seems to pair best with L-amino acids. Some clever experiments have shown that when D-RNA interacts with amino acids, the L versions get preferential treatment. If you consider aminoacylation (a fancy word for attaching amino acids to RNA), it turns out that the process favors L-amino acids. It’s like giving the best dance partners to only left shoes!

For example, scientists have devised some nifty ways to get RNA to grab onto amino acids. They used different types of RNA structures to see how well they pair with various amino acids. The results? L-amino acids strutted onto the dance floor much faster than D-amino acids.

The Dance of Ligation and Hydrolysis

Now, what’s all this about ligation and hydrolysis? Think of ligation as the joining of two dance partners, while hydrolysis is the messy breakup that can happen during the dance. In this case, RNA and amino acids are the partners. When researchers put aminoacylated RNA (that’s RNA with an amino acid partner) together with activated strands, they observed that the left-handed partners always seemed to grab the spotlight.

The team ran a series of tests showing that for four different amino acids (alanine, leucine, lysine, and proline), L-amino acids were much quicker to pair up with RNA than their right-handed siblings. When looking closely, the team noticed that while the breaking up (hydrolysis) didn’t show much bias, the joining (ligation) sure did.

For a little comic relief, imagine a dance-off where all the left-handed dancers show up in tuxedos, while the righties come in their pajamas. Of course, the tuxedos trump pajamas!

Are Other Factors at Play?

While the results were exciting, researchers remained cautious. It’s important not to assume everything is due to chirality alone. They found that different RNA structures influenced outcomes, sort of like how the type of dance floor can change how well the dancers perform. Some RNA structures made it easier for the L-amino acids to shine.

The team also wanted to rule out other variables that might mess with their results. They made sure to track hydrolysis rates separately to see if they could explain the differences. Turns out, the effect of the amino acid on RNA structure plays a role, but breaking them apart wasn’t the main reason for the lopsided results.

The Game of Musical Chairs

As the researchers explored these reactions further, they noticed a recurring theme: when RNA gets its makeup done with L-amino acids, it really gets down to business. The same goes for when L-RNA is used; it appears to favor the D-amino acids! Imagine a game of musical chairs where the rules flip depending on who shows up to dance!

This dance party is the perfect metaphor for how the initial pairing of D-RNA and L-amino acids might lead back to a foundation where proteins are made up of only left-handed amino acids. Imagine a world where all proteins are just left shoes dancing together, leaving the right ones out in the cold!

The Quest for the Missing Link

Even with all these discoveries, questions remain. As scientists tease apart the relationship between D-RNA and L-amino acids, they’re looking for the missing pieces of this puzzle. While it’s clear that some reactions lead to a preference for L-amino acids, how did this come to be? Could some ancient reactions have set the stage for the left-handed party we see today?

Despite the ongoing research, the process of making the original selection of L-amino acids is still a bit of a head-scratcher. One thing seems clear: D-RNA’s charm left quite a mark.

Conclusion: Putting the Pieces Together

As researchers continue to study the dance of nucleotides and amino acids, the puzzle of life’s handedness remains captivating. With RNA in the limelight, the relationship between D-RNA and L-amino acids may have set the stage for the rich diversity of life we see today.

In a world where left-handedness rules, it’s fascinating to consider how this bias came to be and what it means for our understanding of life’s origins. Just remember, the left-handed dancers might have some secrets to share-if we can only crack the code!

In the end, whether you prefer left shoes or right, everyone can appreciate the rhythm of life and the mystery of how it all began. Keep dancing to the beat of science, and who knows what new discoveries await us!

Original Source

Title: Stereoselectivity of Aminoacyl-RNA Loop-closing Ligation

Abstract: The origin of amino acid homochirality remains an unresolved question in the origin of life. The requirement of enantiopure nucleotides for nonenzymatic RNA copying strongly suggests that homochirality of nucleotides and RNA arose early. However, this leaves open the question of whether and how homochiral RNA subsequently imposed biological homochirality on other metabolites including amino acids. Previous studies have reported moderate stereoselectivity for various aminoacyl-RNA transfer reactions. Here we examine aminoacyl-RNA loop-closing ligation, a reaction that captures aminoacylated RNA in a stable phosphoramidate product, such that the amino acid bridges two nucleotides in the RNA backbone. We find that the rate of this reaction is much higher for RNA aminoacylated with L-amino acids than D-amino acids. We present an RNA sequence that near-exclusively captures L-amino acids in loop-closing ligation. Finally, we demonstrate that ligation of aminoacyl-L-RNA results in inverse stereoselectivity for D-amino acids. The observed stereochemical link between D-RNA and L-amino acids in the synthesis of RNA stem-loops containing bridging amino acids constitutes a stereoselective structure building process. We suggest that this process led to a selection for the evolution of aminoacyl-RNA synthetase ribozymes that were selective for L-amino acids, thereby setting the stage for the subsequent evolution of homochiral peptide and ultimately protein synthesis.

Authors: Shannon Kim, Marco Todisco, Aleksandar Radakovic, Jack W. Szostak

Last Update: 2024-11-28 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.26.625528

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.26.625528.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles