The Search for X17: A Particle Quest
Scientists embark on a journey to find the elusive X17 particle.
The MEG II collaboration, K. Afanaciev, A. M. Baldini, S. Ban, H. Benmansour, G. Boca, P. W. Cattaneo, G. Cavoto, F. Cei, M. Chiappini, A. Corvaglia, G. Dal Maso, A. De Bari, M. De Gerone, L. Ferrari Barusso, M. Francesconi, L. Galli, G. Gallucci, F. Gatti, L. Gerritzen, F. Grancagnolo, E. G. Grandoni, M. Grassi, D. N. Grigoriev, M. Hildebrandt, F. Ignatov, F. Ikeda, T. Iwamoto, S. Karpov, P. -R. Kettle, N. Khomutov, A. Kolesnikov, N. Kravchuk, V. Krylov, N. Kuchinskiy, F. Leonetti, W. Li, V. Malyshev, A. Matsushita, M. Meucci, S. Mihara, W. Molzon, T. Mori, D. Nicolò, H. Nishiguchi, A. Ochi, W. Ootani, A. Oya, D. Palo, M. Panareo, A. Papa, V. Pettinacci, A. Popov, F. Renga, S. Ritt, M. Rossella, A. Rozhdestvensky. S. Scarpellini, P. Schwendimann, G. Signorelli, M. Takahashi, Y. Uchiyama, A. Venturini, B. Vitali, C. Voena, K. Yamamoto, R. Yokota, T. Yonemoto
― 8 min read
Table of Contents
Once upon a time in the world of tiny particles, scientists stumbled upon whispers of a mysterious entity called X17. This particle was rumored to exist in the shadows of nuclear reactions, especially when Protons and rare isotopes like Lithium played together. Scientists have been curious, poking and prodding to find out if X17 is real or just a figment of imagination.
The MEG II Experiment
In the land of particle physics, a heroic group of researchers teamed up to build a fancy piece of equipment called the MEG II detector. Think of it as a high-tech camera that snaps pictures of really fast things that no human can see. This gadget was designed to catch sights of strange happenings in the world of particles, especially looking for signs of X17. Their home base was at a place called PSI, which is like Disneyland for physicists.
The Hunt Begins
The scientists set off on their quest armed with a particle accelerator that could hurl protons like a cosmic slingshot. With energy rocketing up to 1.1 MeV (that’s mega-electron volts, but let’s just call it “speedy stuff”), they aimed these protons at Lithium nuclei. This was no ordinary game of darts. The goal? To see if hitting the Lithium would yield an X17 sighting.
During a month-long adventure of data collection, using beams of protons, they focused on two particular energy levels that are known to excite Lithium nuclei. The excitement of these nuclei might produce the X17 particle. However, like looking for a needle in a haystack, scientists didn’t find much luck.
What Were They Looking For?
When scientists watched the fireworks of particle collisions, they were particularly interested in Electrons and Positrons flying out of the mixture. They thought that if the elusive X17 was lurking around, it might show up in the angles and patterns of these particles.
To look for X17, they measured the angles of these electron-positron pairs. The idea was simple: if the X17 was real, it might cause a noticeable change in how these particles danced around. However, the scientists expected a neat pattern, but they found more of a chaotic party instead.
The Strangest Normality
As they sifted through the data collected during their experiment, something felt off. When analyzing the angles of the particles, they noticed a deviation from what they expected. They were hoping to see the angles drop steadily, but they saw something that looked like the party was just getting started.
These unexpected results hinted at the possibility of something new, perhaps even a new type of particle. But without further evidence, it could simply be a glitch or noise in their measurements. The scientists were left scratching their heads.
The Background Noise
In any great search, there are always distractions. The scientists had to account for background events that were like pesky flies buzzing around during the picnic. They had to carefully separate the true signals from these background noises. Just because you hear someone shout “Eureka!” doesn’t mean they found gold; it could just be someone excited about finding a penny.
To manage this, they created complex models to represent the expected noise. They used simulations to understand how many of these background events to expect. This was akin to preparing for a concert where you have to account for loud neighbors or malfunctioning speakers.
The Results Are In!
After all their hard work, the moment of truth arrived. The scientists gathered around to see if they had any signs of the fabled X17. Sadly, even with all the excitement and data, they found no significant evidence of its existence. The results were like a balloon that popped before you even got to enjoy it.
However, they didn’t leave empty-handed. They established limits on how often X17 could be produced if it were real. Think of it as putting up a “no parking” sign in a space where you suspect a ghost car might be parked.
The Next Steps
Not ones to be discouraged, the scientists decided this was just the beginning of their journey. They proposed that more data might yield better results. After all, the universe is a big place, and who knows what other secrets lie waiting to be uncovered? They even thought of a few tricks they could use to try and coax out the X17 if it really did exist.
Imagine trying to lure a shy cat out from under the couch. You might try dangling a toy or offering treats. It’s the same in the particle world, where scientists must come up with creative ways to get particles to reveal themselves.
Reflections on the Hunt
At the end of this scientific saga, one thing was clear: chasing after particles is not for the faint-hearted. It requires patience, creativity, and a lot of data crunching. The researchers learned valuable lessons along the way, like figuring out how to separate the signal from the noise and how to build better models for future experiments.
While they didn’t land X17 in their quest, they knew the search itself was a key part of the adventure. Every experiment not only probes the unknown but also sharpens the tools needed for tomorrow's discoveries.
Conclusion
As they packed up their equipment and prepared for the next venture, the scientists held onto hope. The story of X17 isn’t over yet; it’s merely in a pause before the next chapter. After all, in the world of particle physics, every dead end can lead to exciting new adventures. So, stay tuned, because who knows when X17 might finally decide to show up for a party?
Additional Thoughts on Particle Physics
Particle Party Crashers
In the realm of particles, everyone wants to join the party. There are known characters like protons and neutrons, which are like the popular kids at school, while X17 is more of an elusive figure that many talk about but few have seen. Scientists continue to throw grand parties in the hope that X17 will RSVP one day.
The Uninvited Guests
While searching for X17, scientists had to deal with a host of uninvited guests. These were the background events that cluttered the dance floor and made it hard to see what's really happening. By carefully sorting through the noise, they could focus better on what they believed could be signals pointing to X17’s existence.
Keep the Light On
For scientists, having the right tools is crucial. It’s like trying to find your keys in the dark; a flashlight makes all the difference. In this case, advanced detectors and analysis techniques served as that light, illuminating paths that might lead to new discoveries.
The Community Spirit
Collaboration is vital in science. Just like a soccer team, every player has a role. Physicists from various backgrounds come together to share their knowledge and skills. They work as a united force in the quest for understanding the universe, tackling challenges together, and celebrating even the smallest victories.
Laughing at Fate
Despite the challenges, one thing unites all scientists: their love for discovery. And every now and then, they take a moment to laugh at the absurdity of their work. After all, pursuing something as tiny as a particle may seem ridiculous, but it brings meaning to the vastness of the universe and our existence.
The Next Chapter
As the dust settles from the MEG II experiment, the scientific community is already brainstorming for the next expedition. The search for new particles like X17 may take time, but each attempt adds to the collective understanding of the universe. It’s a long game, filled with twists, turns, and surprises.
In the end, whether X17 turns out to be a superstar or just a rumor, the pursuit of knowledge is an adventure worth taking. Who knows what other mysteries await behind the curtains of the particle theater? With every experiment, scientists inch closer to unraveling the grand story of the cosmos, one elusive particle at a time.
A Final Laugh
So if you ever find yourself in a conversation about particle physics, remember this: we may not have found X17 yet, but we’re certainly having a blast looking for it. And let’s be honest, the journey of chasing after invisible particles is a lot more thrilling than waiting for the next big blockbuster movie to come out! Keep those particle accelerators humming, folks!
Title: Search for the X17 particle in $^{7}\mathrm{Li}(\mathrm{p},\mathrm{e}^+ \mathrm{e}^{-}) ^{8}\mathrm{Be}$ processes with the MEG II detector
Abstract: The observation of a resonance structure in the opening angle of the electron-positron pairs in the $^{7}$Li(p,\ee) $^{8}$Be reaction was claimed and interpreted as the production and subsequent decay of a hypothetical particle (X17). Similar excesses, consistent with this particle, were later observed in processes involving $^{4}$He and $^{12}$C nuclei with the same experimental technique. The MEG II apparatus at PSI, designed to search for the $\mu^+ \rightarrow \mathrm{e}^+ \gamma$ decay, can be exploited to investigate the existence of this particle and study its nature. Protons from a Cockroft-Walton accelerator, with an energy up to 1.1 MeV, were delivered on a dedicated Li-based target. The $\gamma$ and the e$^{+}$e$^{-}$ pair emerging from the $^8\mathrm{Be}^*$ transitions were studied with calorimeters and a spectrometer, featuring a broader angular acceptance than previous experiments. We present in this paper the analysis of a four-week data-taking in 2023 with a beam energy of 1080 keV, resulting in the excitation of two different resonances with Q-value \SI{17.6}{\mega\electronvolt} and \SI{18.1}{\mega\electronvolt}. No significant signal was found, and limits at \SI{90}{\percent} C.L. on the branching ratios (relative to the $\gamma$ emission) of the two resonances to X17 were set, $R_{17.6} < 1.8 \times 10^{-6} $ and $R_{18.1} < 1.2 \times 10^{-5} $.
Authors: The MEG II collaboration, K. Afanaciev, A. M. Baldini, S. Ban, H. Benmansour, G. Boca, P. W. Cattaneo, G. Cavoto, F. Cei, M. Chiappini, A. Corvaglia, G. Dal Maso, A. De Bari, M. De Gerone, L. Ferrari Barusso, M. Francesconi, L. Galli, G. Gallucci, F. Gatti, L. Gerritzen, F. Grancagnolo, E. G. Grandoni, M. Grassi, D. N. Grigoriev, M. Hildebrandt, F. Ignatov, F. Ikeda, T. Iwamoto, S. Karpov, P. -R. Kettle, N. Khomutov, A. Kolesnikov, N. Kravchuk, V. Krylov, N. Kuchinskiy, F. Leonetti, W. Li, V. Malyshev, A. Matsushita, M. Meucci, S. Mihara, W. Molzon, T. Mori, D. Nicolò, H. Nishiguchi, A. Ochi, W. Ootani, A. Oya, D. Palo, M. Panareo, A. Papa, V. Pettinacci, A. Popov, F. Renga, S. Ritt, M. Rossella, A. Rozhdestvensky. S. Scarpellini, P. Schwendimann, G. Signorelli, M. Takahashi, Y. Uchiyama, A. Venturini, B. Vitali, C. Voena, K. Yamamoto, R. Yokota, T. Yonemoto
Last Update: 2024-11-12 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07994
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.07994
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.