The Enigma of Supernovae: A Closer Look
A deep dive into the mysteries surrounding supernovae and AT2018cow.
Anne Inkenhaag, Peter G. Jonker, Andrew J. Levan, Morgan Fraser, Joseph D. Lyman, Lluís Galbany, Hanindyo Kuncarayakti
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
- What's Happening in the Universe?
- The Mystery of AT2018cow
- Methods of Investigation
- Gathering Data
- Findings from the Observations
- The Effect of Circumstellar Material
- The Importance of UV Studies
- The Nature of Interacting Supernovae
- The Peculiar Case of AT2018cow
- Concluding Thoughts
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Supernovae are the explosive endings of stars. They are like the grand final of a fireworks show, signaling the end of a star's life. With so many telescopes now searching for these events, we keep finding more and more supernovae. In the coming years, this search will only get faster and more exciting.
There are different types of supernovae, mainly categorized by whether they contain hydrogen or not. Type I supernovae don’t have hydrogen, while Type II do. Within these types, there are sub-types, each with its own unique story.
What's Happening in the Universe?
As stars grow older, they can lose their outer layers. This loss creates a cloud of material around them, called Circumstellar Material (CSM). When a supernova happens, the explosion can interact with this CSM, leading to some interesting light shows. Observing these interactions can help scientists learn more about the stars that went boom.
Some supernovae exhibit strange behaviors. For example, luminous fast blue optical transients (LFBOTs) are a new breed of cosmic mystery. They decay quickly, and we don't have a clear understanding of their origins. With so many peculiarities in the cosmos, scientists are eager to learn more.
AT2018cow
The Mystery ofAmong these unusual events is AT2018cow, a bright and fast object that caught everyone's attention. Observations showed that it emitted UV light long after the explosion. This hints at a possible connection to supernovae, particularly Core-collapse Supernovae (CCSNe).
To figure out if AT2018cow is just another supernova or something entirely different, researchers are diving into the UV Emissions of supernovae. They're asking questions like: How common is late-time UV emission? Can it help us pin down the nature of AT2018cow?
Methods of Investigation
To tackle these questions, scientists examined a sample of nearby supernovae observed with the Hubble Space Telescope. They wanted to see how many of these supernovae exhibited UV emissions two to five years after they exploded.
If AT2018cow were like other supernovae, it could provide valuable clues. The idea is that by comparing the UV brightness of AT2018cow with these other events, researchers can figure out what makes it special-or not.
Gathering Data
In their study, scientists used a total of 51 nearby supernovae. They checked for UV emissions and gathered data about their brightness. They conducted experiments to ensure they didn't miss any faint light sources near the supernova positions. This careful work allows them to filter out noise and focus only on what might be meaningful.
Findings from the Observations
After all that careful sleuthing, they found two supernovae that emitted light consistent with being related to AT2018cow. However, when they compared the brightness of AT2018cow to these two events, it didn't seem like anything out of the ordinary.
But there’s a twist! When looking only at supernovae closer to AT2018cow, it was significantly brighter than most. This led scientists to think that AT2018cow's UV light might not be due to interactions with surrounding material. Instead, it could imply we're catching a glimpse of the explosion's inner workings.
There’s another fascinating possibility: long-lived accretion disks could be at play, shedding light on the mystery of AT2018cow in a way we didn't expect.
The Effect of Circumstellar Material
The surrounding material plays a big role in how light behaves after a supernova. When the supernova explodes, if it runs into this material, we see different effects in the light emissions. Researchers want to understand how this material behaves and how it affects the light curve of supernovae over time.
Comparing different supernovae helps establish patterns. It's kind of like figuring out what’s normal for one type of event to compare it to another.
The Importance of UV Studies
Studying UV emissions is crucial because many supernovae brighten in the UV spectrum due to interactions with the circumstellar material. It’s like putting on a special pair of glasses to see the hidden colors of a painting. Observing supernovae in different wavelengths gives us a fuller picture of what’s going on.
This research shines a light on how these emissions help in understanding supernova environments and their progenitors. If we want to know where these supernovae come from and what they’re made of, we need to keep collecting these UV observations.
The Nature of Interacting Supernovae
Interacting supernovae are exciting cases because they give hints about their surroundings. The signs of interaction show up as bursts of light in certain wavelengths, telling us about the material around the star before it exploded.
By understanding this, scientists can build a better picture of the life cycle of stars and the conditions leading to explosions. For example, interactions can lead to brightening in the UV, suggesting that an interested observer should focus on that wavelength to uncover the truth.
The Peculiar Case of AT2018cow
AT2018cow is particularly interesting because it was bright for a long time after the explosion. Observations showed UV light that didn’t fade quickly, unlike typical supernovae. When comparing similar supernovae, it looks like AT2018cow might not fit neatly into the existing models.
While the UV brightness of AT2018cow fits with the behaviors of known interacting supernovae, it stands out because of its sustained brightness. This raises questions: Is it different, or is it just a part of a more extensive and complex picture of supernova behavior?
Concluding Thoughts
By digging into the UV emissions of supernovae, researchers are opening doors to new understanding. They have laid some groundwork in observing the peculiar AT2018cow, proving there’s still much to learn about these cosmic events.
These findings suggest we need more research and observation to connect the dots in our knowledge of supernovae and their environments.
So, the next time you look up at the night sky and see a star twinkling, remember that some of those tiny points of light might just be former stars putting on a show-one that could help us understand the universe a little better.
And who knows? Maybe one day we’ll discover even more peculiar events than AT2018cow. Until then, keep your eyes to the skies!
Title: A study on late time UV-emission in core collapse supernovae and the implications for the peculiar transient AT2018cow
Abstract: Over time, core-collapse supernova (CCSN) spectra become redder due to dust formation and cooling of the SN ejecta. A UV detection of a CCSN at late times thus indicates an additional physical process such as interaction between the SN ejecta and the circumstellar material, or viewing down to the central engine of the explosion. Both these models have been proposed to explain the peculiar transient AT2018cow, a luminous fast blue optical transient that has been detected in the UV 2-4 years after the event with only marginal fading over this time period. To identify if the late-time UV detection of AT2018cow could indicate that it is a CCSN, we investigate if CCSNe are detected in the UV between 2-5 years after the explosion. We use a sample of 51 nearby (z
Authors: Anne Inkenhaag, Peter G. Jonker, Andrew J. Levan, Morgan Fraser, Joseph D. Lyman, Lluís Galbany, Hanindyo Kuncarayakti
Last Update: 2024-11-14 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09690
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.09690
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://outerspace.stsci.edu/display/HAdP/Improvements+in+HST+Astrometry
- https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dr2
- https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/
- https://archives.ia2.inaf.it/aao/
- https://www.stsci.edu/hst/instrumentation/wfc3/data-analysis/photometric-calibration/uvis-photometric-calibration
- https://hst-docs.stsci.edu/wfc3dhb/chapter-9-wfc3-data-analysis/9-1-photometry
- https://stev.oapd.inaf.it/cgi-bin/cmd
- https://www.astropy.org