Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance with New Tech
New methods improve our fight against drug-resistant bacteria.
Julian A. Paganini, Jesse J. Kerkvliet, Gijs Teunis, Oscar Jordan, Nienke L. Plantinga, Rodrigo Meneses, Rob J.L. Willems, Sergio Arredondo-Alonso, Anita C. Schürch
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a big problem for health around the world. In simple terms, it means that the germs that cause infections are becoming tough enough to fight off the medicines we use to kill them. A staggering number of people, about 1.27 million, lost their lives due to infections caused by bacteria that had become resistant to treatment in just one year-2019. This number sadly keeps growing as more germs learn how to resist drugs.
In the last few years, even though scientists have been busy, only a few new medicines to tackle these resistant germs have been approved. These new antibiotics are only suggested for specific situations, making it hard to treat everyone who needs help. Researchers are trying out alternative ways to deal with these infections, but these methods haven't been widely used in hospitals yet. It looks like it will be a while until new treatments might become the norm. The best way to prevent a larger AMR crisis is to stop the resistant bacteria from spreading.
Plasmids and Their Role in AMR?
What AreThe spread of AMR is not simple. It involves many factors, but one important player is something called plasmids. Think of plasmids as little bits of DNA that can easily move between bacteria. These plasmids often carry the genes that make bacteria resistant to antibiotics, and they can be shared between different types of bacteria in various ways.
Plasmids are like the party crashers of the bacterial world-mixing and mingling among different species, sometimes causing outbreaks in hospitals. Because of their significant role in spreading resistance, being able to identify and track plasmids has become crucial. We need to understand how diverse plasmids are and how they evolve, which has become a matter of urgency.
Sequencing
The Role of Next-GenerationTo study these bacteria and their plasmids better, scientists use next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. This is a fancy way of saying that researchers can read the DNA of bacteria on a large scale. However, most scientists still rely on a method called Illumina short-read sequencing, even though newer technologies allow for complete bacterial genomes to be sequenced.
As of the end of 2023, a big database called the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) had over 2.3 million bacterial DNA sequences, and around 97.8% of these were created using the Illumina short-read technology. However, there’s a catch! Plasmids often have repeated elements that make it tricky to piece them together accurately using just short-read data. So, researchers need special tools to help them reconstruct these plasmids.
Introducing a New Method: gplasCC
Recently, a new method called gplasCC was developed to put the pieces of these plasmids together. This tool helps identify which parts come from plasmids and which parts come from chromosomes, the main DNA structure in bacteria. It uses something known as plasmidEC, which is a classifier that sorts the nodes in an assembly graph. After the initial sorting, gplasCC bins these nodes into individual plasmid groups based on how they connect to each other and their sequence coverage.
This method has already proven to be better than a popular existing tool called MOB-suite, especially when it comes to reconstructing plasmids that have antibiotic-resistance genes. The goal of this new study is to improve how we classify and reconstruct plasmids in many different types of bacteria using short-read data.
Creating the PlasmidCC Model
To make the plasmid classification better, a new tool called plasmidCC was created. This tool uses a type of database called Centrifuge, specially built for classifying plasmid sequences. The researchers made specific databases for seven common bacteria that are often seen in human infections.
Additionally, they created a general database that includes lesser-known species. This was a smart move, as it allows for the identification of plasmids across a wider range of bacteria.
Improving Reconstruction with gplasCC
Not only did they build a classifier, but they also improved the plasmid assembly process with gplasCC. This streamlined the classification and reconstruction steps into one smooth operation. In this updated version, repeated sequences are now assigned to their correct plasmid bins. This means that the tool can handle situations better where segments of DNA repeat themselves, which is often problematic for many existing tools.
By applying gplasCC to the results from plasmidCC, the researchers could piece together individual plasmids from various bacteria. They wanted to see how gplasCC compared to other well-known tools like MOB-suite and plasmidSPAdes.
Checking the Tools
To ensure that gplasCC and plasmidCC worked well, the researchers set up a benchmarking study using a large dataset of bacterium samples. They gathered different genomes and their short reads from existing databases to see how well their tools performed compared to others.
They examined how well the tools could classify and reconstruct plasmids, using a wide variety of strains, which added complexity to the testing. By doing this, they could measure the accuracy of each tool and how effectively they handled the data.
Understanding the Results
When evaluating the performance, gplasCC stood out in many areas compared to its competitors. It achieved high scores in accuracy, completeness, and the ability to correctly categorize plasmids.
Interestingly, it was found that gplasCC could detect small plasmids even better than other tools. This was no small feat, as small plasmids can be pretty sneaky!
As with any scientific endeavor, there were challenges. Some bacteria have really complex plasmid systems that can make reconstruction tricky. But by improving technology and ideas around plasmid research, gplasCC is paving the way for better tools to tackle these issues.
The Bigger Picture
AMR is a serious threat, and understanding how it spreads is crucial not just for our health but for the future of medicine. As bacteria evolve and adapt, the tools scientists use to study them must evolve too.
By developing and refining methods like gplasCC and plasmidCC, researchers are taking significant steps toward managing AMR more effectively. They’re not just piecing together plasmids; they’re also piecing together a better future for healthcare.
A Call to Action
With AMR on the rise, preventing the spread of resistant bacteria is everyone's responsibility. Whether you’re in healthcare, a researcher, or just someone who cares about health, staying informed and supporting research is vital.
The study of plasmids and their role in AMR is a journey-one that will require global collaboration, funding, and public support. Together, we can tackle these challenges and work towards a world where infections don’t outsmart our medicines. It's time to roll up our sleeves and get to work!
Title: gplasCC: classification and reconstruction of plasmids from short-read sequencing data for any bacterial species
Abstract: Plasmids play a pivotal role in the spread of antibiotic resistance genes. Accurately reconstructing plasmids often requires long-read sequencing, but bacterial genomic data in publicly accessible repositories has historically been derived from short-read sequencing technology. We recently presented an approach for reconstructing Escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance plasmids using Illumina short reads. This method consisted of combining a robust binary classification tool named plasmidEC with gplas2, which is a tool that makes use of features of the assembly graph to bin predicted plasmid contigs into individual plasmids. Here, we developed gplasCC, a plasmidEC-simplification, capable of classifying plasmid contigs using Centrifuge databases. We have developed seven plasmidCC databases in addition to the database for E. coli: six species-specific models (Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella enterica) and one species-independent model for less frequently studied bacterial species. We combined these models with gplas2 (now, gplasCC) to reconstruct plasmids from more than 100 bacterial species. This approach allows comprehensive analysis of the wealth of bacterial short-read sequencing data available in public repositories and advance our understanding of microbial plasmids.
Authors: Julian A. Paganini, Jesse J. Kerkvliet, Gijs Teunis, Oscar Jordan, Nienke L. Plantinga, Rodrigo Meneses, Rob J.L. Willems, Sergio Arredondo-Alonso, Anita C. Schürch
Last Update: 2024-12-03 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.28.625923
Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.28.625923.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://github.com/kblin/ncbi-genome-download
- https://github.com/ncbi/sra-tools
- https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore
- https://github.com/tseemann/abricate
- https://gitlab.com/mmb-umcu/gplascc
- https://gitlab.com/mmb-umcu/plasmidCC
- https://gitlab.com/jpaganini/gplascc_benchmark
- https://zenodo.org/record/7194565/files/K_pneumoniae_plasmid_db.tar.gz
- https://zenodo.org/record/7133407/files/S_enterica_plasmid_db.tar.gz
- https://zenodo.org/record/7133406/files/S_aureus_plasmid_db.tar.gz
- https://zenodo.org/record/7326823/files/A_baumannii_plasmid_db.tar.gz
- https://zenodo.org/records/10471306/files/E_faecalis_centrifuge_db.tar.gz
- https://zenodo.org/records/10472051/files/E_faecium_centrifuge_db.tar.gz
- https://zenodo.org/record/7431957/files/general_plasmid_db.tar.gz