Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Physics # Popular Physics # History and Philosophy of Physics

Newton's Third Law: Is It Always True?

Exploring the debates around the validity of Newton's third law of motion.

Taha Sochi

― 6 min read


Is Newton's Law Always Is Newton's Law Always Valid? law. Debating the limits of Newton's third
Table of Contents

Newton's Third Law of motion states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. This means that if you push on something, it pushes back just as hard. It sounds simple, right? You’d think so. However, when you dive a bit deeper into the world of physics, you find that this basic idea is not as clear-cut as it appears.

Newton's Third Law: A Quick Overview

Imagine you are playing on a seesaw. When you push down on one side, the other side rises. That’s Newton's third law in action. It’s the reason why rockets can lift off the ground: the engines push down on the exhaust gases, and those gases push the rocket up with equal force.

But here's the kicker: some scientists are saying that this law may not hold up all the time. This has sparked a lot of discussions (and a few arguments) in the physics community.

The Importance of Newton’s Third Law

Why do we care about this law anyway? Well, it’s a big deal in Classical Mechanics, which is the branch of physics that deals with ordinary things like cars, balls, and people moving around. If this law has exceptions, it might mean that there are gaps in our understanding of how things work in the physical world.

The Claims of Violations

Where’s the Violation?

Some scientists claim to see violations of Newton's third law in various situations. For example, in the world of electrodynamics, which is all about electric charges and magnetic fields, some say that the action and reaction forces don’t always match up. Imagine two charged particles: when one moves, it feels a force, yet the other might not feel an equal force right away. It’s like a cosmic game of tag that’s a little out of sync.

A Little Lag

This could be compared to two people playing catch and one of them is a bit slow on the uptake. You throw the ball; the other person doesn't react instantly, and suddenly, the rules seem to change. If the actions don't balance, then Newton’s third law may not apply in those situations. Cue the dramatic music!

Reflections on Classical Mechanics

Classical mechanics is like the backbone of physics, and Newton's laws are its essential parts. If it turns out that one of these parts is rusty or cracked, it could shake the whole structure. That’s why the claims of violations make scientists scratch their heads and wonder if the foundations of physics need some maintenance.

Is It Really a Violation?

The biggest question is whether these claimed violations are really violations. Some physicists counter that even if Newton's third law doesn’t apply in certain cases, the principle of conservation of Momentum still holds strong. Think of it as a superhero: even if one side of the equation is faltering, the other side comes to save the day.

A Closer Look at Momentum

Momentum is like the cheerleader of physics – it’s always there, rooting for the laws to succeed. It states that the total amount of momentum in a closed system remains constant. So, even if two charged particles aren’t playing fair with Newton's law, momentum might still be in the game, so to speak.

The Role of Experiments

Surprisingly, much of the debate around these claimed violations is based on theoretical arguments rather than solid experiments. It’s like arguing about the best pizza topping without ever actually trying a slice. Scientists really need to measure these forces directly in experiments to see if the reactions match the actions as they should.

The Importance of Frameworks

The way scientists interpret these claims often depends on the theoretical framework they choose to adopt. Some frameworks are like comfy old sweaters – familiar and warm – while others are brand new and might be a little scratchy. Scientists pick which framework to use based on their beliefs about how the universe operates.

The Concept of Action at a Distance

Sometimes, the issue boils down to the concept of action at a distance. This principle suggests that objects can influence each other without being in direct contact. It’s like two magnets that can pull each other together even when they're not touching. Some folks believe in it, while others say it’s a no-go. If action at a distance is real, then it complicates the picture of Newton’s law.

The Role of Non-Inertial Frames

Let’s throw another twist into the mix: non-inertial frames. This happens when you’re in a car that suddenly accelerates or turns. You feel pushed back into your seat, and it feels like a force is acting on you, but this force doesn’t fit neatly into Newton's third law. Some people argue that in these situations, the law might not apply.

Confusion Among Scholars

The discussion about these violations reveals a lack of consensus among scientists. Some firmly believe that Newton's third law can be violated in certain contexts, while others insist it’s still valid. It’s like a disagreement over whether pineapple belongs on pizza – strong opinions but no unanimous decision.

A Philosophical Angle

There’s also a philosophical debate about the nature of space and how it interacts with matter. Some argue that space itself can be involved in the action-reaction relationship between objects. If this is true, then it raises questions about the fundamental nature of forces in our universe.

The Biological Dimension

Interestingly, some claims have even popped up in biological systems, suggesting that Newton's third law might not apply to living organisms. However, this is a slippery slope; it combines physics with complex biological behavior, which adds another layer of complication.

The Need for Clarity

With all these various claims and counterclaims, it’s evident that the investigation of Newton’s third law is messy. There’s a need for clear, objective methodologies in science to tackle these questions. Otherwise, we end up with a tangled web of theories and opinions that could lead us further away from understanding the universe.

Conclusion

The discussions surrounding Newton's third law reveal how intricate and layered the world of physics can be. Violations may or may not exist, and the implications could ripple across the entire discipline. What’s clear is that much is still to be understood, and as scientists peel back layers of complexity, they uncover new mysteries that keep them on their toes. Physics may have its stars, but there are still many plot twists ahead!

Final Thoughts

As we continue to observe and experiment, the hope is to get a clearer picture of how forces, motion, and reactions really work in our universe. Whether or not Newton's third law faces some challenges, one thing is certain: the journey of understanding is never-ending.

Original Source

Title: The Epistemology of Contemporary Physics: Classical Mechanics II

Abstract: In this paper of "The Epistemology of Contemporary Physics" series we investigate Newton's third law and discuss and analyze its epistemological significance from some aspects with special attention to its relation to the principle of conservation of linear and angular momentum. The main issue in this investigation is the potential violations of this law according to the claims made in the literature of mainstream physics. This issue may cast a shadow on the validity of classical mechanics, and its Newtonian formulation in particular, formally and epistemologically and could have important implications and consequences on contemporary physics in general. However, what is more important about this issue from our perspective is the lack of clarity, comprehensibility and coherence in the investigation and analysis of this issue and its implications marked by the absence of appropriate conceptual and epistemological frameworks to deal with this issue properly and systematically. As a result, what we find in the literature is a collection of contradicting views which are mostly based on personal choices and preferences and selective or biased theoretical analysis with the lack of proper experimental verification and substantiation.

Authors: Taha Sochi

Last Update: 2024-11-15 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10022

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.10022

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles