Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology # Neuroscience

The Social Game of Mice

Explore the dynamics of mouse social hierarchies and competition.

Mao-Ting Hsu, Yumiko Akamine, Kiyoto Kurima, Kazumasa Z. Tanaka, Jeffery R. Wickens

― 4 min read


Inside Mouse Social Inside Mouse Social Structures world. Discover how mice navigate their social
Table of Contents

Social hierarchy is a way to understand how different members of a group rank against each other. In simple terms, it's like a pecking order in a flock of birds or a chain of command in an office. You have the boss, the middle management, and the interns. This ranking is common in social animals, including mice, where some individuals are dominant, some are intermediate, and others are subordinate.

Why is Social Hierarchy Important?

Having a social hierarchy helps animals (including humans) by making it easier to share resources like food and mates. It keeps things organized, reducing conflicts over who gets what. For example, a dominant mouse will usually get first dibs on food and mates, while the subordinate one might have to wait its turn. This system helps maintain peace within the group and reduces constant fighting for resources.

The Winner-Loser Effect

One interesting aspect of social hierarchy is the winner-loser effect. This idea suggests that how you do in one contest influences how you act in future contests. If a mouse wins a fight, it may become more aggressive and ready to compete again. Conversely, if it loses, it may shy away from future confrontations. This can create a flexible social structure where ranks can shift based on recent experiences.

How Do Mice Establish Their Hierarchies?

Mice usually establish their ranks through Competitions, often in simple tasks like fitting into a tube. When they compete, the winners gain a higher rank. Researchers often observe these competitions over several days to see how stable the hierarchy becomes. If one mouse beats another repeatedly, it will secure a dominant position, while the other mice adjust their actions accordingly.

The Role of the Brain in Social Hierarchy

Interestingly enough, the brain plays a big part in determining how these hierarchies are formed and maintained. Research has shown that certain areas of the brain, particularly in the striatum, are involved in how mice experience wins and losses. The striatum helps process these experiences, influencing how mice respond in future social situations.

The Role of Cholinergic Interneurons

Among the neurons in the striatum, cholinergic interneurons (ChIs) are key players. While they represent only a small percentage of the total neurons in the striatum, they help regulate how flexible the brain is when it comes to adapting to new social situations. If these neurons are damaged, it can change how mice behave in social competitions, particularly in terms of their willingness to switch ranks after winning or losing.

Competition and Social Ranking

In experiments, researchers put mice through a series of competitions to see how their ranks changed based on winning or losing. The studies showed that when a dominant mouse lost to a competitor from another cage, its status could drop when returning home. Conversely, subordinate mice that succeeded against their counterparts in other cages often rose in rank afterward.

The Warm Spot Test

Researchers also employ a warm spot test as a measure of Dominance. In this test, mice compete for a warm area, much like how they compete for food or mates. The time spent in the warm area reflects their dominance level. A mouse that spends more time there is usually seen as more dominant within the group.

The Effects of Cage-Mates

The social ranking is not only affected by individual wins and losses but also by the performances of their cage-mates. If dominant mice from one cage lose to competitors, they may return home and lose to lower-ranked cage-mates. Likewise, if lower-ranked mice win against others, they may feel more confident when facing their former higher-ranked partners.

How Weight Plays a Role

You might think that bigger mice automatically become dominant due to their size. However, studies show that body weight does not correlate with social ranking in most cases. Instead, past performance and the ability to adapt to social situations play a more crucial role.

Cholinergic Interneurons and Behavioral Flexibility

The striatum’s cholinergic interneurons help facilitate behavioral flexibility. When they are functioning well, they allow mice to adapt their behavior based on new experiences. If these neurons are damaged, dominant mice face difficulty adjusting their strategies, sometimes resulting in rank instability in the social hierarchy.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Social Hierarchies in mice are dynamic and can change based on past competition results. These changes occur due to interactions with other mice and the roles that neurons play in the brain. Understanding these relationships gives insight into not just mouse behavior, but social dynamics in animals and perhaps even humans.

So, the next time you see a mouse scurrying around, remember: there's a whole social game happening behind those beady eyes! They might be plotting their next move in the never-ending quest for food, mates, and, of course, dominance.

Original Source

Title: Cholinergic interneurons of the dorsomedial striatum mediate winner-loser effects on social hierarchy dynamics in male mice.

Abstract: Cholinergic interneurons of the dorsomedial striatum may play a role in social hierarchy dynamics. A social hierarchy is an organization of individuals by rank that occurs in social animals. Establishing a new social hierarchy involves flexible behavior in deciding whether to be a winner or loser, experience of winning or losing, and stabilization of rank. The neural circuits underlying such flexible behavior have yet to be fully understood, but previous research indicates that cholinergic interneurons in the dorsomedial striatum play a role in behavioral flexibility. We used the dominance tube test to measure ranking within group housed mice, before and after between-cage competitions using the same test. We found that the experience of winning or losing against mice from different cages not only contributes to new social hierarchies among the competitors, but also causally influences the subsequent social hierarchy among their cage mates in the home cage - supporting the hypothesis of winner-loser effects on later social ranking. To test the hypothesis that cholinergic interneurons contribute to social hierarchy dynamics, we made a selective lesion of cholinergic interneurons in the dorsomedial striatum. The lesion did not prevent social hierarchy formation among pairs of similarly ranked individuals from different cages. However, it reduced the loser effect of external competition on the subsequent home-cage rankings in dominant mice. In light of these results we suggest that cholinergic interneurons in dorsomedial striatum increase the flexibility of social hierarchy dynamics. Significance statementThe effect of winning or losing a competition on subsequent ranking in mouse home cage social hierarchies was examined using the dominance tube test. We found that losing, when dominant mice were defeated by equally ranked mice from another cage, led to decreased social rank in their home cage. Conversely, winning by initially subordinate mice led to increased rank in the home cage social hierarchy. The loser effect on subsequent behavior in dominant mice was reduced after selective lesions of the cholinergic interneurons of the dorsomedial striatum. We suggest that losing might produce these effects by altering the activity of cholinergic interneurons, and thus modulating synaptic plasticity in neural circuits involved in flexible decision making and positive reinforcement.

Authors: Mao-Ting Hsu, Yumiko Akamine, Kiyoto Kurima, Kazumasa Z. Tanaka, Jeffery R. Wickens

Last Update: 2024-12-04 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.04.626719

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.04.626719.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles